EXPERT WATCH 11: EXPERT ASSERTS THAT THE CLAIMANT WAS MALINGERING BUT WOULDN’T TELL THE COURT ABOUT THE DETAILS OF THE TESTS THAT LED TO THAT CONCLUSION

We have seen some unusual conduct of experts on this site.  However the case we look at today has elements that we have not looked at before.  An expert carried out tests on the claimant and, as a result of those tests, concluded that the claimant was "malingering".  However the expert would not (in...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below