EXPERT WATCH 13: WHEN THE CLAIMANT ATTEMPTED TO INTRODUCE A NEW CASE DURING CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE DEFENDANTS’ EXPERT (HOW DO WE THINK THIS WENT?)

We are looking at a case where the claimant's expert, belatedly, accepted that the reports he was relying on were unreliable.  The claimant then attempted to introduce new matters and evidence to bolster an alternative case.   The judge rejected that attempt.

(There is nothing wrong with an expert ...