Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 16.8K other subscribers
Recent Posts
- “HALLUCINATIONS” IS NOT A GOOD WORD FOR FALSE CASES GENERATED BY AI: THIS JEOPARDISES THE RULE OF LAW: LESSONS FROM THE COURTS OF OREGON
- COST BITES 318: PART 36 ISSUES: DOES AN AGREEMENT ON DAMAGES AFTER TRIAL MEAN THAT THE NORMAL PART 36 CONSEQUENCES DO NOT APPLY?
- SUSPECTED HALLUCINATED QUOTATIONS IN A HIGH PROFILE JUDGMENT: IF THIS IS CORRECT THEN A LINE HAS BEEN CROSSED…
- COST BITES 317: ANOTHER ROUND IN THE MEDICAL AGENCY FEES/BREAKDOWN BATTLE: THE AGENCY MUST PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN
- REVIEW OF THE YEAR (3): CLAIM FORM ISSUES: SERVICE AT THE “LAST KNOWN ADDRESS” AND THE CLAIMANT’S DUTIES
Top Posts
- REVIEW OF THE YEAR (3): CLAIM FORM ISSUES: SERVICE AT THE "LAST KNOWN ADDRESS" AND THE CLAIMANT'S DUTIES
- SUSPECTED HALLUCINATED QUOTATIONS IN A HIGH PROFILE JUDGMENT: IF THIS IS CORRECT THEN A LINE HAS BEEN CROSSED...
- COST BITES 317: ANOTHER ROUND IN THE MEDICAL AGENCY FEES/BREAKDOWN BATTLE: THE AGENCY MUST PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN
- "HALLUCINATIONS" IS NOT A GOOD WORD FOR FALSE CASES GENERATED BY AI: THIS JEOPARDISES THE RULE OF LAW: LESSONS FROM THE COURTS OF OREGON
- COST BITES 318: PART 36 ISSUES: DOES AN AGREEMENT ON DAMAGES AFTER TRIAL MEAN THAT THE NORMAL PART 36 CONSEQUENCES DO NOT APPLY?
Archives
Blogroll
Books
Useful Links
Copyright
© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025.
Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
You must be logged in to post a comment.