COST BITES 355: VARYING A BUDGET (3): PROPOSED VARIATIONS DISALLOWED BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT MADE “PROMPTLY”

This is the final part of today's trilogy considering applications to vary costs budget.  We have already seen that the judge determined that many issues in the case were "significant developments" which could, in theory, lead to a variation of the budget.   However the next part of the test is the ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below