EXPERT WATCH 44: THE JUDGE PREFERS THE EVIDENCE OF ONE EXPERT OVER ANOTHER: IT IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT…

Here we have a case where success for the claimant rested almost wholly on their  expert evidence being accepted.  This is not altogether unusual for a clinical negligence case.  What is notable about this case is that the treating doctor did not give evidence at trial, the judge essentially had to ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below