Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2026 » June » 17
BOTH SIDES WANTED A STRIKE OUT FOR NON-COMPLIANCE - BUT GOT NOWHERE (A FAIRLY EXPENSIVE - AND FRUITLESS DAY OUT...): "LOCKED HORNS" AND "SPIRITED CORRESPONDENCE"

BOTH SIDES WANTED A STRIKE OUT FOR NON-COMPLIANCE – BUT GOT NOWHERE (A FAIRLY EXPENSIVE – AND FRUITLESS DAY OUT…): “LOCKED HORNS” AND “SPIRITED CORRESPONDENCE”

June 17, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

Here we have applications to strike out by both sides for alleged non-compliance with a court order.  The judge described the  defendants’ application as “aggressive” and the claimant’s application as a “tit for tat” application. Ultimately, however, we are looking…

THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION: WHAT LITIGATION FIRMS NEED TO DO NOW - AND THE CONSEQUENCES IF THEY DON'T: WEBINAR JUNE 25th 2026 (A BARGAIN AT £99)

THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION: WHAT LITIGATION FIRMS NEED TO DO NOW – AND THE CONSEQUENCES IF THEY DON’T: WEBINAR JUNE 25th 2026 (A BARGAIN AT £99)

June 17, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Webinar

We have been looking at the new SRA Guidance on Effective Supervision over the past week.  This webinar will look at the key points of the guidance for litigators, in particular and provide a series of checklists and templates for…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 81: IF YOU ARE RELYING ON A STATUTE THAT WASN'T ACTUALLY IN FORCE ON THE DATE IN QUESTION IT MAY HAVE BEEN BETTER FOR YOU TO HAVE PLEADED THIS...

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 81: IF YOU ARE RELYING ON A STATUTE THAT WASN’T ACTUALLY IN FORCE ON THE DATE IN QUESTION IT MAY HAVE BEEN BETTER FOR YOU TO HAVE PLEADED THIS…

June 17, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

Here we have an unusual case where the trial judge’s findings in favour of the defendant were overturned on appeal. One particular feature of this case is the fact that the claimant relied on a statute that was actually in…

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: CLAIMANT'S WITNESS STATEMENT WAS SUFFICIENT TO SHOW THAT IT COULD PAY AN ADVERSE COSTS AWARD: APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS REFUSED

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: CLAIMANT’S WITNESS STATEMENT WAS SUFFICIENT TO SHOW THAT IT COULD PAY AN ADVERSE COSTS AWARD: APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS REFUSED

June 17, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

An assessment of the degree to which a judge can disbelieve  witness evidence in writing plays a  major part in the judgement we are looking at here.  The claimant’s witness gave evidence that it was solvent and would be able…

THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION 3: THE KEY THEMES  - THE GUIDANCE AND TEN USEFUL CHECKLISTS

THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION 3: THE KEY THEMES – THE GUIDANCE AND TEN USEFUL CHECKLISTS

June 17, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

We are continuing our examination of the SRA Guidance on Effective Supervision by looking at what are identified as the “Key themes”.  Here we look at the central points, the relevant guidance itself and then 10 checklists which help ensure…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COST BITES 449 : YOUR CASE AGAINST ME WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE YOU HAD NO PROPER CAUSE OF ACTION: SHOULD I GET 100% OF MY COSTS ON THE INDEMNITY BASIS? (LIFE IS MORE NUANCED THAN THIS…)
  • THE IMPORTANCE OF MAKING AN APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME BEFORE THE DATE OF COMPLIANCE: THE COURT DOES NOT CONSIDER DENTON PRINCIPLES EVEN IF THE APPLICANT FAILS TO MEET THEIR OWN PROPOSED TIMETABLE
  • EXPERT WATCH 71: “I DO NOT ATTACH WEIGHT TO THIS REPORT AS EXPERT EVIDENCE”: THE EXPERT WAS “ADVOCATING” AND “HE TRESPASSES INTO THE ROLE RESERVED TO THE TRIBUNAL”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: ADVISING CLIENTS AS TO THE RISKS OF LITIGATION: “CLIENTS WANT TWO INCONSISTENT THINGS”: CASES AND GUIDANCE (SEPTEMBER 2018)
  • MORE ABOUT THE CASE AGAINST A SOLICITOR BEING STRUCK OUT: THE ABSENCE OF AN ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY MEANT THERE WAS NO CASE: A CLAIMANT CANNOT HOPE THAT “SOMETHING WILL TURN UP” ON DISCLOSURE…

Top Posts

TUPE DOES NOT PASS ON LIABILITIES TO THIRD PARTIES: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY
EXPERT WATCH 70: EXPERTS' FAILURES TO REPORT ON THE RANGE OF OPINIONS LEADS TO THEIR VIEWS BEING REJECTED: ESSENTIAL READING FOR EVERY PERSONAL INJURY AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYER, ANYONE WHO INSTRUCTS AN EXPERT (AND ANY EXPERT...)
THE IMPORTANT DISTINCTION BETWEEN AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT AND ONE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: DECISION TO STRIKE OUT ALLOWED ON APPEAL BECAUSE THE JUDGE HAD WRONGLY CONSIDERED THE MERITS
LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AVOIDING THE PITFALLS (2): HOW TO SPOT "FALSE" AUTHORITIES AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT (PLUS SOME USEFUL LINKS)
LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AVOIDING THE PITFALLS (3): AI AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: VERY DANGEROUS BEDFELLOWS: TWENTY KEY POINTS

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.