Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2026 » September » 08
TUPE DOES NOT PASS ON LIABILITIES TO THIRD PARTIES: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

TUPE DOES NOT PASS ON LIABILITIES TO THIRD PARTIES: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

September 8, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Personal Injury

The Court of Appeal today found that TUPE does not transfer an employer’s pre-transfer vicarious liability to third-party claimants.  This has important practical implications for many practitioners, particularly in the fields of personal injury and clinical negligence. “…  just standing…

COST BITES 448: THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY HAS TO PAY THE FULL COSTS OF LOSING AN ACTION: ARGUMENTS ABOUT "CHILLING EFFECT" WERE NOT ESTABLISHED AND NOT EVIDENCED IN ANY EVENT

COST BITES 448: THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY HAS TO PAY THE FULL COSTS OF LOSING AN ACTION: ARGUMENTS ABOUT “CHILLING EFFECT” WERE NOT ESTABLISHED AND NOT EVIDENCED IN ANY EVENT

September 8, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

Here we look at some unusual arguments from an unsuccessful defendant as to why it should not be liable to pay the claimants’ costs in full.  In the end the defendant succeeded in reducing the costs of a single claimant…

COST BITES 447 : SHOULD A DEFENDANT'S DERAILMENT OF AN EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION LEAD TO INDEMNITY COSTS ORDERS BEING MADE AGAINST IT?

COST BITES 447 : SHOULD A DEFENDANT’S DERAILMENT OF AN EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION LEAD TO INDEMNITY COSTS ORDERS BEING MADE AGAINST IT?

September 8, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we have an interesting judgment on the interaction between costs, pleadings and the court’s encouragement of an ADR Process.  The claimant argued that a defendant’s conduct lead to the adjournment, and eventual abandonment of an Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”)….

LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE  AVOIDING THE PITFALLS (2): HOW TO SPOT "FALSE" AUTHORITIES AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT (PLUS SOME USEFUL LINKS)

LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AVOIDING THE PITFALLS (2): HOW TO SPOT “FALSE” AUTHORITIES AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT (PLUS SOME USEFUL LINKS)

September 8, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Many practising lawyers will now have seen cases where AI has been used to put forward legal propositions. Sometimes this involves “hallucinated” cases, statutes or rules.  More problematically a real case or statute is cited, however the citation is wrong…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COST BITES 465 : WITHOUT PREJUDICE COSTS BREAKDOWNS REMAINED PRIVILEGED: A LOWER BILL DID NOT ESTABLISH “UNAMBIGUOUS IMPROPRIETY”
  • A SUCCESSFUL JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION TO APPEAL: GRANTING JUDGMENT AFTER AN EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION: A “WHOLLY EXCEPTIONAL COLLAPSE OF FAIR PROCEDURE”
  • PROVING THINGS 300: COMPANY FAILS TO PROVE ITS OWN FINANCIAL SITUATION: APPLICATION FOR A STAY REFUSED
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR: THINGS WILL GO WRONG: “YOU GOTTA HAVE A PLAN”: DON’T CRASH…” (OCTOBER 2019)
  • COST BITES 464 : THE IMPORTANCE OF MAKING A PROPER APPLICATION TO VARY A COSTS CAP: TICKING A BOX IS NOT ENOUGH: THE COURT APPLIES THE £5,000 AARHUS LIMIT: SOMETHING TO CHEW THE CUD OVER

Top Posts

COST BITES 461: "LOSING PARTY" SHOULD PAY COSTS AT THE END OF HEARING, DESPITE HAVING BEEN GRANTED PERMISSION TO APPEAL
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 99: ONCE AGAIN - A BARE DENIAL WILL NOT DO: DEFENCE STRUCK OUT: "THIS RULE IS NOT A MATTER OF FORMALITY"
HOUSING CASES AND ALLOCATION TO THE FAST TRACK: THE FACT THAT THE CLAIM WAS BASED ON AN EARLIER COMPROMISE DID NOT MEAN THAT THIS WAS A SMALL CLAIMS TRACK MATTER
PARTIES SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED: JUDGE HIGHLY CRITICAL OF DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT OF LITIGATION
A SUCCESSFUL JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION TO APPEAL: GRANTING JUDGMENT AFTER AN EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION: A "WHOLLY EXCEPTIONAL COLLAPSE OF FAIR PROCEDURE"

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.