Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2026 » September » 25
DOES AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT AMOUNT TO A "STEP IN THE ACTION" SO THAT AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS DISPLACED? AN IMPORTANT QUESTION CONSIDERED ON APPEAL

DOES AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT AMOUNT TO A “STEP IN THE ACTION” SO THAT AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS DISPLACED? AN IMPORTANT QUESTION CONSIDERED ON APPEAL

September 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

If the parties have agreed to an arbitration clause and one of them issues proceedings then the right to seek a stay of that action can be lost if the defendant takes a “step in the action”.  This case considers…

WHEN POSSIBLE FRAUDULENT CONDUCT EMERGES - CAN A SOLICITOR SIMPLY CARRY ON AS BEFORE? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED

WHEN POSSIBLE FRAUDULENT CONDUCT EMERGES – CAN A SOLICITOR SIMPLY CARRY ON AS BEFORE? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED

September 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

Here we look at difficult conduct issue. This is in the context of applications for judicial review.  However some of the problems are universal. What does the lawyer do if there are “red flags” that indicate that the solicitor is…

CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 2026: HOUSING LAWYERS BE AWARE...

CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 2026: HOUSING LAWYERS BE AWARE…

September 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes

Some, apparently, minor updates to Practice Directions have a major significance for housing law practitioners in particular.  Here we look at the major change, which relates to housing disrepair claims and the minor corrections.   KEY PRACTICE POINTS The addition…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 95: THE DEFENDANT'S ARGUMENT THAT THE JUDGE HAD AWARDED THE CLAIMANTS MORE THAN THEIR PLEADED CASE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 95: THE DEFENDANT’S ARGUMENT THAT THE JUDGE HAD AWARDED THE CLAIMANTS MORE THAN THEIR PLEADED CASE

September 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Statements of Case

This is another case relating to pleading damages. Here the objection was that the judge had awarded the claimants more than they had pleaded.  In some circumstances this may have made a difference. On the facts of this case it…

EXPERT WATCH 72: THE DEFENDANT HAD LEFT IT TOO LATE TO OBJECT TO THE CLAIMANTS' EXPERT EVIDENCE: THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE AT TRIAL NOT AT THE APPEAL STAGE

EXPERT WATCH 72: THE DEFENDANT HAD LEFT IT TOO LATE TO OBJECT TO THE CLAIMANTS’ EXPERT EVIDENCE: THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE AT TRIAL NOT AT THE APPEAL STAGE

September 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

If a party is going to object to their opponents relying on expert evidence this is best done promptly.  Leaving it to the appeal stage is dangers – as this case shows.  The defendant received a report, commented on the…

THROWBACK FRIDAY: FOR WANT OF A PAGE IN A BUNDLE THE DAMAGES WERE LOWER... (SEPTEMBER 2015)

THROWBACK FRIDAY: FOR WANT OF A PAGE IN A BUNDLE THE DAMAGES WERE LOWER… (SEPTEMBER 2015)

September 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Here we look at a post from 2015 about a missing page in a trial bundle.   The claimant argued that the missing page meant that damages had been too low.  The judge held that  that an application  the day after…

THE PAYING PARTY'S MANUAL:  HOW TO REDUCE YOUR OWN CLIENT'S LIABILITY TO PAY THEIR OPPONENT'S COSTS: THE WEBINAR, THE BOOK AND THE TOOLKIT

THE PAYING PARTY’S MANUAL: HOW TO REDUCE YOUR OWN CLIENT’S LIABILITY TO PAY THEIR OPPONENT’S COSTS: THE WEBINAR, THE BOOK AND THE TOOLKIT

September 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Webinar

There is surprisingly little practical guidance for litigators on how to reduce their own client’s liability to pay their opponent’s costs.  This webinar, book and toolkit aims to help fill that gap.  Starting from the premise that potential liability for…

WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT - GUIDANCE FOR A PAYING PARTY: A 10 POINT CHECKLIST, USEFUL LINKS AND THE DISCOUNT CODE FOR THE WEBINAR AND BOOK THE PAYING PARTY'S MANUAL

WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT – GUIDANCE FOR A PAYING PARTY: A 10 POINT CHECKLIST, USEFUL LINKS AND THE DISCOUNT CODE FOR THE WEBINAR AND BOOK THE PAYING PARTY’S MANUAL

September 25, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Useful links, Webinar

Here we look at those points and posts of particular interest to those representing a paying party.  It is the forerunner to the webinar on the 12th November and the accompanying book “The Paying Party’s Handbook”.  At the foot of…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COST BITES 465 : WITHOUT PREJUDICE COSTS BREAKDOWNS REMAINED PRIVILEGED: A LOWER BILL DID NOT ESTABLISH “UNAMBIGUOUS IMPROPRIETY”
  • A SUCCESSFUL JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION TO APPEAL: GRANTING JUDGMENT AFTER AN EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION: A “WHOLLY EXCEPTIONAL COLLAPSE OF FAIR PROCEDURE”
  • PROVING THINGS 300: COMPANY FAILS TO PROVE ITS OWN FINANCIAL SITUATION: APPLICATION FOR A STAY REFUSED
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “STAYING SANE AS A LITIGATOR: THINGS WILL GO WRONG: “YOU GOTTA HAVE A PLAN”: DON’T CRASH…” (OCTOBER 2019)
  • COST BITES 464 : THE IMPORTANCE OF MAKING A PROPER APPLICATION TO VARY A COSTS CAP: TICKING A BOX IS NOT ENOUGH: THE COURT APPLIES THE £5,000 AARHUS LIMIT: SOMETHING TO CHEW THE CUD OVER

Top Posts

COST BITES 461: "LOSING PARTY" SHOULD PAY COSTS AT THE END OF HEARING, DESPITE HAVING BEEN GRANTED PERMISSION TO APPEAL
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 99: ONCE AGAIN - A BARE DENIAL WILL NOT DO: DEFENCE STRUCK OUT: "THIS RULE IS NOT A MATTER OF FORMALITY"
HOUSING CASES AND ALLOCATION TO THE FAST TRACK: THE FACT THAT THE CLAIM WAS BASED ON AN EARLIER COMPROMISE DID NOT MEAN THAT THIS WAS A SMALL CLAIMS TRACK MATTER
PARTIES SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED: JUDGE HIGHLY CRITICAL OF DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT OF LITIGATION
WHAT HAS CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF DONE ABOUT .... PREVENTING PROBLEMS WITH THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LITIGATION? 10 KEY POINTS

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.