MITCHELL -v- NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS: OUTLINE OF CLAIMANT'S SUBMISSIONS
There appeal in the Mitchell case was heard in the Court of Appeal case earlier today. Judgment was reserved. I have a note of the arguments on behalf of the Claimant/Appellant. The Defendant’s arguments will be posted later. I…
THE IMPORTANCE OF DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS THAT COMPLY WITH THE RULES
The Civil Procedure Rules set out rigorous requirements for the structure and layout of witness statements. The editors of the White Book note (at 32.4.5 of the latest supplement that) “Unfortunately, rules, practice directions and guidance as to the contents…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND CPR 3.9: TWO CASES WHERE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WAS GRANTED
The issues caused by the new CPR 3.9 have featured many times on this blog. Here we look at two High Court decisions where relief from sanctions was granted. Kesabo –v- African Barrick Gold Plc and (because the full transcript…
EXTENSIONS OF TIME WHEN THERE IS A MINOR BREACH: FULL TRANSCRIPT IN RAYYAN AL IRAQ CO LTD NOW AVAILABLE
The case of Raayan Al Iraq Co. Ltd –v- Trans Victory Machine Inc [2013] EWHC 2696 (Comm) was mentioned in an earlier post. The full transcript is now available and provides useful reading for those applying for retrospective extensions of…
THEVARAJAH –V- RIORDAN NOW FULLY REPORTED: SECOND BITE OF CHERRY IN RELATION TO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS
The case of Thevarajah –v- Riordan has been discussed before. Initially relief from sanctions was refused, however it was then granted at a second application. Here we look at the decision in more detail, in particular the CPR 3.9…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED SECOND TIME AROUND: QUITE A TWIST TO THIS TALE?
The case of Thevarajah –v-Riordan has been reported before at http://civillitigationbrief.wordpress.com/2013/08/13/relief-from-sanctions-a-case-where-relief-was-refused/ when the court refused to grant relief from sanctions where the defendant had failed to comply with disclosure obligations. H… Enjoying this post? Become a Civil Litigation Brief member…
ANOTHER FAILED APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: MORE LESSONS TO LEARN
The decision in Michael –v- Middleton [2013] EWHC 2881 (Ch) provides another example of the difficulties that arise in making an application for relief from sanctions. However close examination of the judgment also provides some interesting lessons in conducting litigation and…
HAVE YOU COMPLIED WITH AN "UNLESS ORDER"? GUIDANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF E-DISCLOSURE
A hearing on the question of whether a party has complied with an unless order is always a fraught one. The stakes are high, particularly for the party alleged to be in breach. Here we look at compliance in relation…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND COSTS BUDGETING: THE JUDGMENT IN MITCHELL -v- NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS IN FULL
The full transcript of the decision of Master McCloud in Andrew Mitchell MP –v- Express Group Newspapers [2013] EWHC 2355 (QB) is now available. The case was discussed, in outline in an earlier post, http://civillitigationbrief.wordpress.com/2013/08/11/litigatorswant-to-work-for-nothing-then-don… Enjoying this post? Become a…
SANCTIONS AND DEFAULT: THE NEW APPROACH IN PRACTICE. THE FULL TRANSCRIPT OF BAKER -v- HALLAM ESTATES
The post yesterday looked at the duties owed by an applicant making a without notice application. The full transcript of the case is now available and contains some salutary observations. Baker –v- Hallam Estates Baker -v- Hallam Estates [2013]…
DOES THE CIVIL LITIGANT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS? CPR 3.9, ARTICLE 6 AND THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL
This post looks at the case law relating to Article 6 and the right to a fair trial in civil proceedings. It looks at whether decisions under the new CPR 3.9 need to consider the issue of “proportional response”. …
LITIGATION AFTER JACKSON: A 10 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE
There has been a tremendous change in policy in relation to case management after 1st April 2013. This has already led to major difficulties for some litigators. This post is the first (of what may be many) survival guides for…
SERVICE OF A COPY CLAIM FORM IS NOT GOOD SERVICE: HOW COULD THIS BENEFIT A CLAIMANT?
This post looks at the unusual case of Hills Construction –v- Struth [2013] EWHC 1693 (TCC) which considered issues relating to service of the claim form and extensions of time for service of the Particulars of Claim. The facts…
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CPR: CAN BITE DEFENDANTS TOO!
This post looks at the decision in Dass –v- Dass where the defendant was refused permission to rely upon medical experts because they had not been served in accordance with court directions. Many of the recent cases in relation to…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: THE KEY DATE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW CPR 3.9
This post deals with misunderstandings that appear to be in place as to which cases the new CPR 3.9 provisions on relief from sanctions apply to. In particular whether the key date is the date of issue of proceedings or…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: A CASE WHERE RELIEF WAS REFUSED
This post discusses a recent case where the Court refused relief from sanctions. In Thavattheva Theveraraja and Southern Territory Ltd –v- Riordan, Burke and Prestige Property Developer UK Ltd (Ch D 09/08/2013) Hildyard J refused relief from sanctions when…
LITIGATORS:WANT TO WORK FOR NOTHING? THEN DON'T FILE YOUR COSTS BUDGET ON TIME
This post deals with the extremely draconian penalty imposed on a litigant who fails to file a costs budget on time. THE RULES CPR 3.13 and 14 deals with the duty to exchange costs budgeting. Filing and exchanging…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: A CASE IN WHICH RELIEF WAS GRANTED. WYCHE -v- CAREFORCE GROUP LTD
Every case in relation to relief from sanctions is being examined carefully after 1st April. The case of IAN ALAN WYCHE v CAREFORCE GROUP PLC (2013)QBD (Comm) 25/07/2013 is going to be of interest. The case is not yet fully reported…
