RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND COSTS BUDGETING: THE JUDGMENT IN MITCHELL -v- NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS IN FULL
The full transcript of the decision of Master McCloud in Andrew Mitchell MP –v- Express Group Newspapers [2013] EWHC 2355 (QB) is now available. The case was discussed, in outline in an earlier post, http://civillitigationbrief.wordpress.com/2013/08/11/litigatorswant-to-work-for-nothing-then-don… Enjoying this post? Become a…
SANCTIONS AND DEFAULT: THE NEW APPROACH IN PRACTICE. THE FULL TRANSCRIPT OF BAKER -v- HALLAM ESTATES
The post yesterday looked at the duties owed by an applicant making a without notice application. The full transcript of the case is now available and contains some salutary observations. Baker –v- Hallam Estates Baker -v- Hallam Estates [2013]…
DOES THE CIVIL LITIGANT HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS? CPR 3.9, ARTICLE 6 AND THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL
This post looks at the case law relating to Article 6 and the right to a fair trial in civil proceedings. It looks at whether decisions under the new CPR 3.9 need to consider the issue of “proportional response”. …
LITIGATION AFTER JACKSON: A 10 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE
There has been a tremendous change in policy in relation to case management after 1st April 2013. This has already led to major difficulties for some litigators. This post is the first (of what may be many) survival guides for…
SERVICE OF A COPY CLAIM FORM IS NOT GOOD SERVICE: HOW COULD THIS BENEFIT A CLAIMANT?
This post looks at the unusual case of Hills Construction –v- Struth [2013] EWHC 1693 (TCC) which considered issues relating to service of the claim form and extensions of time for service of the Particulars of Claim. The facts…
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CPR: CAN BITE DEFENDANTS TOO!
This post looks at the decision in Dass –v- Dass where the defendant was refused permission to rely upon medical experts because they had not been served in accordance with court directions. Many of the recent cases in relation to…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: THE KEY DATE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW CPR 3.9
This post deals with misunderstandings that appear to be in place as to which cases the new CPR 3.9 provisions on relief from sanctions apply to. In particular whether the key date is the date of issue of proceedings or…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: A CASE WHERE RELIEF WAS REFUSED
This post discusses a recent case where the Court refused relief from sanctions. In Thavattheva Theveraraja and Southern Territory Ltd –v- Riordan, Burke and Prestige Property Developer UK Ltd (Ch D 09/08/2013) Hildyard J refused relief from sanctions when…
LITIGATORS:WANT TO WORK FOR NOTHING? THEN DON'T FILE YOUR COSTS BUDGET ON TIME
This post deals with the extremely draconian penalty imposed on a litigant who fails to file a costs budget on time. THE RULES CPR 3.13 and 14 deals with the duty to exchange costs budgeting. Filing and exchanging…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: A CASE IN WHICH RELIEF WAS GRANTED. WYCHE -v- CAREFORCE GROUP LTD
Every case in relation to relief from sanctions is being examined carefully after 1st April. The case of IAN ALAN WYCHE v CAREFORCE GROUP PLC (2013)QBD (Comm) 25/07/2013 is going to be of interest. The case is not yet fully reported…
