The claimant served their costs budget 45 minutes late. Both the District Judge and Circuit Judge refused relief from sanctions. The Court of Appeal overturned this decision. THE FACTS The claimant’s cost budget was served at 4.45 and not 4.00….

The previous posts looked at the general principles the Court of Appeal considered.  Here we look at the practical results in the three cases. DENTON: Denton was a case about an allegedly defective milking parlour.  The trial was set to…

The Court of Appeal went on to state that a major misunderstanding had occurred in relation to sanctions applications.  There was a third stage which the Court explained at length. THE THIRD STAGE “31. The important misunderstanding that has occurred…

I have posted details of all the hearings on sanctions over the Monday and Tuesday this week. Here are the links in one place. Submissions in Denton -v- White Submissions in Decadent Vapours Submissions in Utilise -v- Davis The Bar…

Draft judgments are often sent to parties in advance. These are sent on confidential terms in O’Connell -v- Rollings [2014]  EWCA Civ 806 the Court of Appeal made it clear that wider disclosure of drafts should not be made. THE JUDGMENT…

There are important developments this week.  You should be able to follow those on this blog or the associated twitter account @CivilLitTweet. COURT OF APPEAL HEARING ON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS I hope that the arguments employed in the Court of…

The case of Warners Retail Ltd -v- National Westminster Bank (Rose J 09/06/2014) is briefly reported on Lawtel this morning. It concerns the applicability of the Mitchell principles and the overriding objective to a very late application to adduce expert…