COURT EXTENDS TIME TO BRING HUMAN RIGHTS ACT CLAIM: MINOR CLAIMANTS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR

In CJ & Ors Wiltshire Police [2022] EWHC 1661 (QB) Mr Justice Martin Spencer extended the limitation period in a claim under the Human Rights Act.  Although the claimants were ultimately unsuccessful there are important observations in relation to the…

COST BITES 2: A (PROSPECTIVE) RESPONDENT DOES NOT GET THE COSTS OF ATTENDING PERMISSION TO APPEAL HEARING

In Novartis AG & Anor v Teva UK Ltd & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 775 Lord Justice Birss refused to order costs when a respondent to an appeal attended at a permission to appeal hearing. THE CASE The judge heard…

COST BITES 1: USE OF A PARTNER IN A BOUTIQUE FIRM CAN LEAD TO LOWER COSTS

There are many cases in which judges make observations about costs which merit wider circulation.   This series looks at those kinds of matters.  It starts by looking at the observations of Mr Justice Foxton in Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd…

NINE YEARS ON V: 2017: THE  CLAIMANT THAT TURNED DOWN A PART 36 OFFER OF £1.5 MILLION AND GOT £2  INSTEAD: A LESSON FOR LITIGANTS WITH MOUTHS TOO WIDE

Choosing one case from each year is not an easy task.  We have reached 2017 and I have selected two posts which relate to the same case.  A claimant sought damages of £15 million but failed to prove it had…

WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST SOLICITORS WHO DID NOT ENSURE THAT THEY HAD APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY TO ACT ON BEHALF OF A COMPANY

In Rushbrooke UK Ltd v 4 Designs Concept Ltd [2022] EWHC 1687 (Ch)  HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a High Court Judge) made a wasted costs order against a firm of solicitors who had acted for a limited company without…

NINE YEARS ON IV: 2016: BEING LEGALLY STREETWISE: WHAT THEY DON'T TEACH YOU IN LAW SCHOOL

Continuing with the selection of  post from each year of the blog I have reproduced below a post from February 2016. This post was unusual in that I saw a post from a firm of solicitors, Darlingtons, and asked permission…

SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT BILLS AND CONDUCT: CPR 44.11 DOES NOT APPLY: REDUCTION OF 75% OVERTURNED ON APPEAL

In John Poyser & Co Ltd -v- Spencer [2022] EWHC 1678 (QB) Mr Justice Morris (sitting with Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker as an assessor) overturned a finding that CPR 44.11 applies to solicitor and own client assessments. The practical result…

NOTICE OF APPEAL LODGED AFTER 4.30 LODGED IN TIME: THE COMMERCIAL COURT GUIDE CANNOT OVERRIDE THE PRACTICE DIRECTION

I am grateful to Aidan Robertson QC  for sending me a copy of the decision of Civil Appeals Officer Master Bancroft-Rimmer in the case of Microsoft Corporation -v- JJH Enterprises.  It relates to the interplay of the Commercial Court Guide…

NINE YEARS ON III: 2015: WITNESS STATEMENTS - WHO SAYS YOU'LL WIN NOTHING WITH KIDS

My, highly personal, selection of posts from each year moves on to 2015.  Here we look at a blog post from February 2015 about the decision in Woodland and Maxwell. This is a case that was subject to much interlocutory…

DIRE ISSUES ARISE WHEN AN EXPERT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THEIR OBLIGATIONS IN RELATION TO THE JOINT MEETING: FULL TRANSCRIPT NOW AVAILABLE

I have written before about the decision of Senior Master Fontaine in Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Ltd [2022] EWHC 479 (QB) where the claimants permission to rely on an expert witness was withdrawn because of conduct in relation to…

PERMISSION TO APPEAL REFUSED IN EDWARDS COSTS CASE: THE TEST FOR A SECOND APPEAL WERE NOT SATISFIED

In May I reported on the decision in Edwards (& others) -v- Slater and Gordon UK Limited [2022] EWHC 1091. There was an application for permission to appeal that judgment. Permission was refused. Full details can be found here   THE CASE…

THE CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO FILE A BUDGET DISCUSSION REPORT: A CASE TO CONSIDER

I am grateful to Jodie Davis from Irwin Mitchell for sending me a note of a judgment given in a case relating to non-service of the Budget discussion report.  The note is reproduced in full below.   There is an interesting…

NINE YEARS ON 2: "DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS : THE QUESTIONS YOU ASK WILL DETERMINE THE ANSWERS YOU GET: EIGHT CRUCIAL POINTS ON EVIDENCE"

I am “reprinting” a post from every year that this blog has been going.  Today we have reached 2014.  A post on drafting witness statements and the asking of leading questions.  This is an ongoing issue. The drastic measures introduced…

People were very kind about the 9th anniversary of the blog. I have decided to extend the celebrations slightly by taking a post from each of the nine years.  This was the second ever post on the 25th June 2013. …

QOCS APPLIES TO LEGALLY AIDED CASES: HIGH COURT DECISION

In Macaulay v Karim & Anor [2022] EWHC 1270 (SCCO) Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker found that a legally aided claimant had the protection of QOCS.  A defendant who had a costs order in its favour could not enforce that order…