DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST SOME, BUT NOT ALL, DEFENDANTS: WHEN SHOULD THE COURT ENTER JUDGMENT FOR A SPECIFIED SUM?
In Justice Investments Ltd v Visalia Enegia SL (t/a Nace) [2024] EWHC 815 (KB) Master Dagnall considered the question of whether judgment in default should be entered for a specified sum. The Master held that the fact that the claimant…
VIDEO EVIDENCE NOT ALLOWED AT TRIAL: APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL DISMISSED: A “STORM IN A TEACUP”
In Wilcox v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 2555 (QB) Mrs Justice Lambert dismissed an appeal against a refusal by a defendant to allow video evidence to be adduced at trial. The evidence was not relevant and…
AN ORDER UNDER THE ARBITRATION ACT IS NOT AN ORDER UNDER CPR 3.1(7)
The judgment of Popplewell J in H -v- L [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) relates to an application to remove an arbitrator. Most of the judgment considers the principles relating to the independence of arbitrators. The judge also considered points…
ALLEGATIONS OF JUDICIAL BIAS AND THE INFORMED OBSERVER TEST: THE LAW AND PRACTICE
In Kimyani -v- Sandhu [2017] EWHC 151 (Ch) Master Matthews dealt with the difficult issue of a litigant alleging judicial bias. This judgment emphasises the fact that the test is one of the fair minded and informed observer and not…
You must be logged in to post a comment.