Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.
Browse: Home » Discontinuance
WHAT TIME IS SERVICE BY EMAIL DEEMED TO ARRIVE ON "THE SAME WORKING DAY"? AN ISSUE THAT HAD IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES IN THIS CASE

WHAT TIME IS SERVICE BY EMAIL DEEMED TO ARRIVE ON “THE SAME WORKING DAY”? AN ISSUE THAT HAD IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES IN THIS CASE

August 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Serving documents

We are returning to look again at the case considered in the previous post.  This time honing in on the error that was made initially in relation to the time for service of a notice of discontinuance.  The District Judge…

A FASCINATING AND IMPORTANT JUDGMENT:  WHEN CAN A NOTICE BE SERVED BY EMAIL? AT WHAT TIME CAN IT BE SERVED? ALSO - SOMETHING ABOUT NOTICES OF DISCONTINUANCE AND QOCS

A FASCINATING AND IMPORTANT JUDGMENT: WHEN CAN A NOTICE BE SERVED BY EMAIL? AT WHAT TIME CAN IT BE SERVED? ALSO – SOMETHING ABOUT NOTICES OF DISCONTINUANCE AND QOCS

August 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, QOCS, Serving documents, Uncategorized

I have been sent a case that is important and interesting on many levels.  Firstly in relation to when it is permissible to serve documents by email; secondly in relation to the latest time in the working day that documents…

I'VE DISCONTINUED AGAINST A DEFENDANT BUT I DON'T WANT TO PAY THEIR COSTS: HOW DO WE THINK THIS GOES?

I’VE DISCONTINUED AGAINST A DEFENDANT BUT I DON’T WANT TO PAY THEIR COSTS: HOW DO WE THINK THIS GOES?

July 16, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

There have been a number of cases recently where discontinuing parties have sought to escape the costs consequences that normally apply. We have such a case here.  The judge considers the relevant rules and case law in detail.  It is…

IF YOU DISCONTINUE AN ACTION THEN YOU'RE (NORMALLY) BE GOING TO PAYING THE COSTS: THE HIGH BURDEN IMPOSED IN AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION AS TO COSTS

IF YOU DISCONTINUE AN ACTION THEN YOU’RE (NORMALLY) BE GOING TO PAYING THE COSTS: THE HIGH BURDEN IMPOSED IN AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION AS TO COSTS

June 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Conduct, Costs

Anyone attempting to appeal against an order for costs faces an uphill battle. This may be doubly so if the costs order is made presumptively because they have discontinued an action. Here we consider a case where the difficulties of…

COST BITES 185: VARYING THE AMOUNT PAYABLE AFTER A CLAIMANT DISCONTINUES:  THE COURT CAN TAKE INTO ACCOUNT PRE-DISCONTINUANCE CONDUCT

COST BITES 185: VARYING THE AMOUNT PAYABLE AFTER A CLAIMANT DISCONTINUES: THE COURT CAN TAKE INTO ACCOUNT PRE-DISCONTINUANCE CONDUCT

October 14, 2024 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

In her very last judgment in the case of Elphicke v Times Media Ltd [2024] EWHC 2595 (KB) Master McCloud considered the question of whether it is possible for a court to take into account pre-discontinuance conduct when considering whether…

COST BITES 56: IF YOU DISCONTINUE AGAINST A DEFENDANT YOU HAVE TO PAY THE COSTS

COST BITES 56: IF YOU DISCONTINUE AGAINST A DEFENDANT YOU HAVE TO PAY THE COSTS

February 10, 2023 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Costs, Members Content

In Lendlease Construction (Europe) Ltd v AECOM Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 2855 (TCC)  Mrs Justice Joanna Smith held that a claimant that was discontinuing against one of the defendants in an action should pay the costs.  There was no…

WHEN SOLICITORS APPLY TO COME OFF THE RECORD:  THE RETAINER, DISCONTINUANCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT ISSUES CONSIDERED

WHEN SOLICITORS APPLY TO COME OFF THE RECORD: THE RETAINER, DISCONTINUANCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT ISSUES CONSIDERED

March 29, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content

Judgments in relation to applications to come off the record are rare.  The issue was considered by Mr Justice Turner in Wilson & Ors v Bayer Pharma AG & Ors [2022] EWHC 670 (QB).  The judge considered the application to…

YOU CAN'T QUIT - YOU'RE FIRED: JUDGE DISMISSES CLAIM RATHER THAN ALLOW CLAIMANTS TO DISCONTINUE

YOU CAN’T QUIT – YOU’RE FIRED: JUDGE DISMISSES CLAIM RATHER THAN ALLOW CLAIMANTS TO DISCONTINUE

February 18, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Vale SA v Steinmetz & Ors [2022] EWHC 343 (Comm) Mr Justice Andrew Baker decided an unusual issue. Rather than allow claimants to discontinue the action he dismissed it. THE CASE The parties were part way through a trial,…

DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT LEADS TO NO ORDER FOR COSTS ON CLAIMANT'S DISCONTINUANCE:  A DEED NOT SENT IN TIME

DEFENDANT’S CONDUCT LEADS TO NO ORDER FOR COSTS ON CLAIMANT’S DISCONTINUANCE: A DEED NOT SENT IN TIME

October 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Conduct, Costs, Members Content

In  Hewson v Wells & Ors [2020] EWHC 2722 (Ch) Master Clark varied the usual rule and made no order for costs following the claimant’s discontinuance.   “In my judgment, the change in circumstances was brought about by unreasonable behaviour…

CLAIMANT DISCONTINUES - BUT NO ORDER FOR COSTS: THE PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED

CLAIMANT DISCONTINUES – BUT NO ORDER FOR COSTS: THE PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED

December 10, 2019 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

In Sheinberg v Abdon & Ors [2019] EWHC 3220 (Ch) Master Clark decided that there should be no order for costs after a claimant discontinued his case. The conduct of the defendants was a highly relevant factor. “The amount involved…

DISCONTINUING CLAIMANT STILL HAS TO PAY DEFENDANT'S COSTS: CLAIMANT CANNOT PASS RISKS ON TO ANOTHER DEFENDANT

DISCONTINUING CLAIMANT STILL HAS TO PAY DEFENDANT’S COSTS: CLAIMANT CANNOT PASS RISKS ON TO ANOTHER DEFENDANT

August 31, 2018 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

In BAE Systems Pension Funds Trustees Ltd v Bowmer & Kirkland Ltd [2018] EWHC 1222 (TCC) Mrs Justice Jefford refused the claimant’s application for an order that it should not have to pay the costs of a defendant it discontinued against. …

YOU'VE STARTED SO YOU'LL FINISH: MASTER SETS ASIDE NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE SERVED BY INSURER

YOU’VE STARTED SO YOU’LL FINISH: MASTER SETS ASIDE NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE SERVED BY INSURER

August 12, 2018 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Insurance, Members Content

In Advantage Insurance Co Ltd v Stoodley & Anor [2018] EWHC 2135 (QB) Master Davison set aside the claimant’s notice of discontinuance made after reading the defendant’s  additional written submissions after a hearing.  The notice of discontinuance was viewed as “tactical….

SHAMEFUL LETTERS, LATE DISCONTINUANCE, INDEMNITY COSTS (AND A REFUSAL TO MEDIATE HARDLY COUNTS): THE CLAIMANT WHO LOST SIGHT OF "ANY BASIC STANDARD OF DECENT & COMPASSIONATE BEHAVIOUR"

SHAMEFUL LETTERS, LATE DISCONTINUANCE, INDEMNITY COSTS (AND A REFUSAL TO MEDIATE HARDLY COUNTS): THE CLAIMANT WHO LOST SIGHT OF “ANY BASIC STANDARD OF DECENT & COMPASSIONATE BEHAVIOUR”

July 10, 2018 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

Earlier posts have looked at the issue of aggressive correspondence. Others have looked at the issues of conduct, refusal to mediate and questions relating to indemnity costs. I am grateful to David Turner QC for drawing my attention to a…

COSTS AFTER DISCONTINUANCE VARIED: CLAIMANT TO PAY INDEMNITY NOT STANDARD COSTS: TWO RIGHT FEET BROUGHT THE WRONG ACTION

COSTS AFTER DISCONTINUANCE VARIED: CLAIMANT TO PAY INDEMNITY NOT STANDARD COSTS: TWO RIGHT FEET BROUGHT THE WRONG ACTION

November 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Applications, Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content

When a claimant discontinues an action there is an automatic provision that the claimant pay the defendant’s costs (CPR 38.6). In Two Right Feet Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc & Ors [2017] EWHC 1745 (Ch) Ms Sara Cockerill Q.C. made…

PREVIOUS COSTS ORDERS STAND EVEN AFTER DISCONTINUANCE: A HIGH COURT DECISION

June 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

In Dar Al Arkan Real Estate Company -v- Al Refai [2015] EWHC 1793 (Comm) Mr Justice Andrew Smith considered whether discontinuance of an action should have an effect on previous costs orders. THE CASE The claimants had agreed terms of…

CLAIMANT OBTAINED COSTS OF ACTION EVEN AFTER DISCONTINUANCE: WATCH THE WORDING OF CORRESPONDENCE

November 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content

In Rokvic -v- Peacock [2014] EWHC 3729 (TC) the claimant obtained an order for costs against the defendant even though the claimant had discontinued the action.  It is, if anything, a warning to be totally precise in wording when making offers and…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 35.2K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • A DECISION OF PROFOUND PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE TO SOLICITORS: WHEN IS SOMEONE EMPLOYED BY A SOLICITOR ENTITLED TO “CONDUCT” LITIGATION? A HIGH COURT DECISION THAT WILL HAVE WIDESPREAD RAMIFICATIONS
  • COST BITES 290: BARRISTERS TAKE CARE: ANOTHER REASON THE DBAS WERE INVALID – FAILURE TO INCLUDE COUNSEL’S FEES IN THE EQUATION…
  • COST BITES 289: INVALID DAMAGES BASED AGREEMENTS MEANT THAT THE APPELLANTS COULD NOT RECOVER £1.3 MILLION IN COSTS (A BAD DAY OUT FOR THE LAWYERS INVOLVED…)
  • ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN 2: TRANSFER OF HOUSE TO CIVIL PARTNER SET ASIDE: ARE ATTEMPTS TO AVOID PAYMENT WORTH THE CANDLE?
  • COST BITES 288: IS IT REALLY GOING TO COST £39,967.50 TO HOLD A MEETING BETWEEN LAWYERS? (AND THERE WILL BE TEN OF THEM…)

Top Posts

  • BARRISTER REFERRED TO THE BSB BECAUSE OF THE USE OF AI "HALLUCINATED" CASES: IGNORANCE THAT THIS WAS HAPPENING IS NO DEFENCE
  • A DECISION OF PROFOUND PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE TO SOLICITORS: WHEN IS SOMEONE EMPLOYED BY A SOLICITOR ENTITLED TO "CONDUCT" LITIGATION? A HIGH COURT DECISION THAT WILL HAVE WIDESPREAD RAMIFICATIONS
  • IT WOULD BE AN "AFFRONT TO JUSTICE" NOT TO SET ASIDE THIS "FINAL" JUDGMENT: THERE IS A LOT HERE THAT EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THE LITIGATION PROCESS SHOULD PROBABLY READ
  • COST BITES 289: INVALID DAMAGES BASED AGREEMENTS MEANT THAT THE APPELLANTS COULD NOT RECOVER £1.3 MILLION IN COSTS (A BAD DAY OUT FOR THE LAWYERS INVOLVED...)
  • SOCIAL MEDIA AND CIVIL EVIDENCE: ITS USE IN A TRIAL ABOUT... SCAFFOLDING

Archives

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2023
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.