APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT & THE MITCHELL/DENTON PRINCIPLES: ANOTHER HIGH COURT CASE
There are now several cases that deal with how the “Mitchell/Denton” principles effect applications to have judgment set aside. In Robinson -v- Kensington & Chelsea Royal London Borough (Sir Michael Tugendhat 03/011.204 QB)* a default judgment was set aside on…
SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT, MITCHELL AND DENTON: THE COURT OF APPEAL'S VIEW
The question of how far the “Mitchell/Denton” principles apply to applications by defendants to set aside judgments was considered by the Court of Appeal in Regione Piemonte -v- Dexia Credop SpA [2014] EWCA Civ 1298. It can be seen that these principles…
DENTON APPLIES TO APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENTS: HOCKLEY -v- NORTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE CONSIDERED
The issue of whether the “Mitchell/Denton/CPR 3.9” criteria apply to applications by a defendant to set aside a default judgment has been discussed several times on this blog. In Hockley -v- North Lincolnshire & Goole NHS Trust (19th September 2014)…
MORE ABOUT SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT AND CPR 3.9: NEWLAND -v- TOBA CONSIDERED
The question of whether CPR 3.9 and the Mitchell criteria apply to applications to have judgment set aside is an issue that has been considered several times on this blog. In a decision yesterday Newland -v- Trading FZC (& other)…
YET MORE ON SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT, DELAY & PROMPTNESS
The case of Page -v- Champion Financial Ltd [2014] EWHC 1778 (QB) was discussed in an earlier post in relation to delays in applying to set judgment aside. The case of Dalton -v- Cooper [2014] EWHC 1556 (QB) was decided earlier, by…
SETTING JUDGMENT ASIDE: DELAY & PROMPTNESS
When setting aside a default judgment the court has to consider whether the application was made “promptly”. The relevance and importance of a “prompt” application has been considered several times on this blog. The issue was considered again in Page…
PROMPTNESS AND APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT : THE BIG YELLOW VAN –V- RAYNER 27/05/2014 CONSIDERED
PROMPTNESS AND APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT : THE BIG YELLOW VAN –V- RAYNER (2014) IPEC (Judge Hacon) 27/05/2014 CONSIDERED The importance of a prompt response to procedural issues and setting aside default judgment has been explored previously on this…
SERVICE BY E-MAIL: SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENTS AFTER MITCHELL AND MUCH MORE: BRETT –V- COLCHESTER HOSPITAL UNIVERSITY CONSIDERED
There is a considerable amount of interest in the judgment of Master O’Hare in this case. Firstly was service by e-mail good service when a party had not complied with the Practice Direction on service by electric means? Secondly what…
SETTING ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT AFTER MITCHELL: WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE TEST?
There has been much discussion of whether the Mitchell principles impact upon an application have a default judgment set aside. There are some cases that indicate that the amended CPR 3.9 should be taken into account in relation to a…
MASSIVE DELAY, SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT AND THE MITCHELL PRINCIPLES: MID-EAST SALES LTD –v- UNITED ENGINEERING & THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN CONSIDERED
One of the many moot points that arise from Mitchell is how far the amendment to the overriding objective and CPR 3.9 impact upon applications to have judgment set aside. This issue was considered by Burton J in Mid-East Sales…
