Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.
Browse: Home » Skeleton arguments
IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE LONG SKELETON ARGUMENTS - THEN GIVE THE JUDGE AN INDEX OR LIST OF CONTENTS: A CHANCE TO REVIEW CASES, LINKS AND GUIDANCE ON DRAFTING SKELETONS

IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE LONG SKELETON ARGUMENTS – THEN GIVE THE JUDGE AN INDEX OR LIST OF CONTENTS: A CHANCE TO REVIEW CASES, LINKS AND GUIDANCE ON DRAFTING SKELETONS

August 5, 2025 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

There are limits on the length of skeleton arguments. These are often exceeded.  Here the judge observes that if skeletons are going to be lengthy then the advocates should assist the court by providing an index or list of contents. …

"LESS IS MORE" WHEN DRAFTING NOTICES OF APPEAL: THE "KITCHEN SINK" APPROACH  DOES NOT PERSUADE THE COURT OF APPEAL TO GRANT PERMISSION

“LESS IS MORE” WHEN DRAFTING NOTICES OF APPEAL: THE “KITCHEN SINK” APPROACH DOES NOT PERSUADE THE COURT OF APPEAL TO GRANT PERMISSION

July 9, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

When a Lord Justice of Appeal looks at a notice of appeal and skeleton and refers to a “kitchen sink” approach, we can probably surmise that a proposed appellant  is going to have some difficulty here. When of their colleagues…

THIS SKELETON ARGUMENT IS FAR TOO LONG, DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES - AND ISN'T GOING TO BE ADMITTED

THIS SKELETON ARGUMENT IS FAR TOO LONG, DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES – AND ISN’T GOING TO BE ADMITTED

March 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

In  Henderson & Jones Ltd & Ors v Grange Heating Services Ltd & Ors (COSTS) [2024] EWHC 3572 (TCC) Adrian Williamson KC (sitting as a High Court Judge) refused to admit a “skeleton” argument that was too long and did…

LATE SKELETON ARGUMENTS DO NOT A HAPPY JUDGE MAKE II: THE COURT MAY IMPOSE SANCTIONS IN APPROPRIATE CASES

LATE SKELETON ARGUMENTS DO NOT A HAPPY JUDGE MAKE II: THE COURT MAY IMPOSE SANCTIONS IN APPROPRIATE CASES

October 30, 2024 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

In  Corfield v Howard [2024] EWHC 2727 (Comm)  HH Judge Davis-White KC (sitting as a Judge of the King’s Bench Division) reminded practitioners of the need for skeleton arguments to be filed in  time accordance with court orders.    …

SERVING A SKELETON LATE DOES NOT A HAPPY JUDGE MAKE: IT IS A VICE TO SUPPLY MATERIALS LATE IN THE DAY

SERVING A SKELETON LATE DOES NOT A HAPPY JUDGE MAKE: IT IS A VICE TO SUPPLY MATERIALS LATE IN THE DAY

January 24, 2024 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Members Content, Written advocacy

In  Karimi, R (On the Application Of) v Sheffield City Council [2024] EWHC 93 (Admin) Fordham J sent out a reminder to practitioners (and particularly those who draft skeleton arguments) of the need to file skeleton arguments in accordance with…

WHEN A SKELETON ARGUMENT TRIES TO INTRODUCE EXPERT EVIDENCE:  AN APPROACH DEPRECATED BY THE COURT

WHEN A SKELETON ARGUMENT TRIES TO INTRODUCE EXPERT EVIDENCE: AN APPROACH DEPRECATED BY THE COURT

December 6, 2023 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Appeals, Members Content, Written advocacy

We have seen many examples of witness statements trying to give expert evidence on this blog.  There have been posts about occasional attempts to deal with lacunas in evidence by introducing that evidence in written submissions.  In Re C (‘parental…

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: KEY POINTS AND ISSUES: ANOTHER REMINDER

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: KEY POINTS AND ISSUES: ANOTHER REMINDER

August 21, 2023 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

Periodically I reprise the links to online guidance on skeleton arguments. Here we have a series of links to posts and articles giving guidance on written submissions. “Sir James Hunt has told us of the (unattributed) judicial reaction on receiving…

APPEALS, BUNDLES AND "SPEAKING NOTES": BUNDLES(INCLUDING PAGE NUMBERING) GO AWRY: A "SPEAKING NOTE" IS NOT TO BE USED AS A SUPPLEMENTARY SKELETON ARGUMENT

APPEALS, BUNDLES AND “SPEAKING NOTES”: BUNDLES(INCLUDING PAGE NUMBERING) GO AWRY: A “SPEAKING NOTE” IS NOT TO BE USED AS A SUPPLEMENTARY SKELETON ARGUMENT

May 30, 2023 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

The judgment of Mr Justice Ritchie in Masih & Anor v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust [2023] EWHC 1280 (KB) contains many matters of interest in relation to the conduct of the trial and appeal.   Here we look at two aspects:…

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: KEY POINTS AND ISSUES: A REMINDER

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: KEY POINTS AND ISSUES: A REMINDER

July 22, 2022 · by gexall · in Members Content, Written advocacy

Periodically I reprise the links to online guidance on skeleton arguments. Here we have a series of links to posts and articles giving guidance on written submissions. “Sir James Hunt has told us of the (unattributed) judicial reaction on receiving…

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: NOT TOO LONG, NOT TOO SHORT: MISSIVE FROM THE HIGH COURT: THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING THEM "JUST RIGHT"

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: NOT TOO LONG, NOT TOO SHORT: MISSIVE FROM THE HIGH COURT: THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING THEM “JUST RIGHT”

December 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Written advocacy

In Overd & Ors v The Chief Constable of Avon And Somerset Constabulary [2021] EWHC 3100 (QB) Mr Justice Linden reminded advocates of the guidance relating to skeleton arguments. One was too long, the other too short.     THE…

"PROCEDURAL RIGOUR IS IMPORTANT NOT FOR ITS OWN SAKE. IT IS IMPORTANT IN ORDER FOR JUSTICE TO BE DONE"

“PROCEDURAL RIGOUR IS IMPORTANT NOT FOR ITS OWN SAKE. IT IS IMPORTANT IN ORDER FOR JUSTICE TO BE DONE”

December 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Written advocacy

In R v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Secretary of State for Education ex parte Dolan and Others. [2020] EWCA Civ 1605 the Court of Appeal rejected an argument that the “lockdown” regulations were unlawful. However,…

COVID REPEATS 19: THOSE ADVOCATES WHO ARE GOING TO HELL (AND NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE THE DEVIL'S ADVOCATES)

COVID REPEATS 19: THOSE ADVOCATES WHO ARE GOING TO HELL (AND NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE THE DEVIL’S ADVOCATES)

May 12, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Applications, Members Content, Written advocacy

Some advocates are going to hell. This may seem obvious, but the details were fleshed out by Lord Justice Irwin when giving a talk to the Professional Negligence Bar Association on the 17th April 2018 . It is possible to…

"WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SKELETON ARGUMENT AND A WITNESS STATEMENT?" NOW THERE'S A QUESTION...

“WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SKELETON ARGUMENT AND A WITNESS STATEMENT?” NOW THERE’S A QUESTION…

September 22, 2019 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

That very question “the difference between a skeleton argument and a witness statement” appeared in a search that led someone to this blog today.   It may be worrying that someone has to ask.  The important distinction is often ignored. Day…

HOW TO DRAFT A SKELETON ARGUMENT: GUIDANCE AND LINKS REVISITED

HOW TO DRAFT A SKELETON ARGUMENT: GUIDANCE AND LINKS REVISITED

April 15, 2019 · by gexall · in Members Content, Useful links, Written advocacy

A simple search term arrived on the blog today “How do I draft a skeleton argument?”  I wondered what level of practitioner would google this, however someone pointed out this has all the flavour of a desperate litigant in person…

PROVING THINGS 144: THAT TEMPTATION TO PUT MATTERS IN THE SKELETON THAT AREN'T ESTABLISHED BY THE EVIDENCE: ALSO - THE POWER OF LISTS

PROVING THINGS 144: THAT TEMPTATION TO PUT MATTERS IN THE SKELETON THAT AREN’T ESTABLISHED BY THE EVIDENCE: ALSO – THE POWER OF LISTS

March 7, 2019 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Members Content, Written advocacy

We have looked before at attempts to use a skeleton argument to introduce evidence (often made in desperation to be fair). An example of this can be seen in a short passage in the judgment in Schettini v Silvestri & Ors…

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: A ROUND UP: GUIDANCE ON DRAFTING: JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS (& THERE ARE PLENTY): EXAMPLES ONLINE & SANCTIONS FOR LATE SERVICE

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: A ROUND UP: GUIDANCE ON DRAFTING: JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS (& THERE ARE PLENTY): EXAMPLES ONLINE & SANCTIONS FOR LATE SERVICE

August 26, 2018 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

Recent online discussions about skeleton arguments started with a search term that led to this blog “how long should a skeleton argument be?”  This was probably a good time to provide a review highlighting all the posts about skeleton arguments…

LATE SKELETON ARGUMENTS AND LATE EVIDENCE: THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD DO BETTER: DIVISIONAL COURT DECISION: A TEXTBOOK EXAMPLE OF WHAT NOT TO SAY AND DO

LATE SKELETON ARGUMENTS AND LATE EVIDENCE: THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD DO BETTER: DIVISIONAL COURT DECISION: A TEXTBOOK EXAMPLE OF WHAT NOT TO SAY AND DO

April 27, 2018 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Witness statements, Written advocacy

In The National Council for Civil Liberties (Liberty), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor (Procedural Matters) [2018] HC 976 (Admin) the Divisional Court took care to file a supplemental judgment that dealt…

ADVOCACY: THE JUDGE'S VIEW SERIES 3: PART 1:  THERE IS A SPECIAL RING IN HELL FOR A CERTAIN TYPE OF ADVOCATE (& YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE)

ADVOCACY: THE JUDGE’S VIEW SERIES 3: PART 1: THERE IS A SPECIAL RING IN HELL FOR A CERTAIN TYPE OF ADVOCATE (& YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE)

April 26, 2018 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

I had no plans for a further series on judge’s advice advocacy. However my hand was forced. I had to share the talk given by Lord Justice Irwin given to the Professional Negligence Bar Association on the 17th April. It…

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: GET THE FONT SIZE RIGHT, AND THE LENGTH CORRECT: OR IT COULD COST YOU

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: GET THE FONT SIZE RIGHT, AND THE LENGTH CORRECT: OR IT COULD COST YOU

March 15, 2018 · by gexall · in Appeals, Bundles, Case Management, Members Content, Written advocacy

The Administrative Court Clerks Users Group has sent out an email to many chambers in relation to the format of skeleton arguments.  If you did not receive this it is worth reading. THE EMAIL: SIZE AND FONTS OF SKELETON ARGUMENTS…

PARTIES MUST OBTAIN AN ORDER FOR A HEARING OF A PRELIMINARY ISSUE: (MORE ON LENGTHY SKELETON ARGUMENTS)

PARTIES MUST OBTAIN AN ORDER FOR A HEARING OF A PRELIMINARY ISSUE: (MORE ON LENGTHY SKELETON ARGUMENTS)

March 13, 2018 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Members Content, Written advocacy

In Bokova v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWHC 320 (QB) Mr Justice Dingemans considered several important issues of procedure.   Firstly the need for parties to obtain an order for a hearing on a preliminary issue rather than simply turning up on…

ADVOCACY - THE JUDGE'S VIEW, SERIES 2 PART 3: SKELETON ARGUMENTS, PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION: AN ABSOLUTE GOLDMINE

ADVOCACY – THE JUDGE’S VIEW, SERIES 2 PART 3: SKELETON ARGUMENTS, PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION: AN ABSOLUTE GOLDMINE

November 14, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Skeleton arguments, Uncategorized, Written advocacy

This blog has many posts that record cases where judges have been critical of the contents (and usually length) of skeleton arguments.  A remedy for most of these issues has been available since 2004.  Gray’s Inn prepared a paper “Skeleton…

BUNDLES TOO BIG, SKELETON ARGUMENTS TOO LONG - THEN THE COURT MAY SIMPLY REFUSE TO ACCEPT THEM: PREPARATION FOR HEARING GOES OFF THE TRACKS

BUNDLES TOO BIG, SKELETON ARGUMENTS TOO LONG – THEN THE COURT MAY SIMPLY REFUSE TO ACCEPT THEM: PREPARATION FOR HEARING GOES OFF THE TRACKS

September 8, 2017 · by gexall · in Bundles, Members Content, Written advocacy

The problems caused by over-lengthy skeleton arguments and voluminous bundles feature regularly on this blog.  They are, in fact, some of the most widely read posts on the blog. I do not have to go looking for cases on these…

SKELETON ARGUMENTS  TOO LONG & AMOUNT OF DOCUMENTS "ABSURD": A JUSTIFIABLE JUDICIAL COMPLAINT

SKELETON ARGUMENTS TOO LONG & AMOUNT OF DOCUMENTS “ABSURD”: A JUSTIFIABLE JUDICIAL COMPLAINT

June 13, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Members Content, Written advocacy

In ICAP Management Services Limited -v- Berry [2017] EWHC 1321 (QB) Mr Justice Garnham added his voice to those judges who have protested about the length of skeleton arguments and written submissions and the burden of unnecessary documents. “It is…

FILE A SKELETON ARGUMENT - IT IS MANDATORY

FILE A SKELETON ARGUMENT – IT IS MANDATORY

April 5, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

Many of the posts about skeleton arguments on this blog have been about content (usually length),  The surprising aspect of R -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 639 (Admin) is that both sides decided not to file…

LATE SKELETON ARGUMENTS, ADJOURNMENTS AND THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE

LATE SKELETON ARGUMENTS, ADJOURNMENTS AND THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE

March 9, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Appeals, Members Content, Written advocacy

In Owgilo -v- The General Medical Council [2017] EWHC 419(Admin) Mr Justice Dove considered the situation when a witness statement was served late and the applicant requested an adjournment.  The overriding objective played a prominent part in the decisions made….

TOO LATE AND TOO LONG: OCEANS APART BUT TWO JUDGES HAVE THE SAME VIEW ON LAWYERS' LATE & LENGTHY SUBMISSIONS

August 5, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Uncategorized, Written advocacy

Some parts of the legal profession do not have a reputation for concision. It is interesting to see similar observations coming from two judges, in two very different jurisdictions, on the same day. “Sly lawyers take advantage of this institutional…

UNNECESSARY MATERIAL, DUPLICATION AND INFORMATION OVERLOAD: ANOTHER JUDGE'S LAMENT

July 28, 2016 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Members Content, Uncategorized, Written advocacy

The observations of Mr Justice Kerr at the end of his judgment in Kimmance -v- General Medical Council [2016] EWHC 1808 (Admin) contains some familiar themes in relation to the preparation of cases: bundles, citations and skeletons. “The parties should…

THIS IS A SORRY TALE OF WOE:SPECULATIVE SKELETON ARGUMENTS ARE OF NO ASSISTANCE

February 12, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements, Written advocacy

In Lokhova -v- Tymula [2016] EWHC 225(QB) Mr Justice Dingemans set out a sorry tale of procedural issues in relation to applications in a defamation action. There are important observations in relation to co-operation; service of witness evidence and the…

PICKING UP BAD CITATIONS: & SKELETON ARGUMENTS – STILL TOO LONG:

January 28, 2016 · by gexall · in Members Content, Uncategorized, Written advocacy

In an afternote to his judgement in Commercial Management (Investments) Ltd -v- Mitchell Design and Construct Ltd [2016] EWHC 76 (TCC) Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart added his voice to the many judges who have commented on the excessive length of skeleton…

WITNESS STATEMENT TOO SHORT; SKELETON ARGUMENT TOO LONG AND THE JUDGE WAS NOT NOT PERVERSE

October 25, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements, Written advocacy

In Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust -v- Evans [2015] EWCA Civ 1059 the Court of Appeal rejected an appeal by the defendant against a finding of liability.   There are important observations in relation to procedure which merit examination.  In…

WRITTEN ADVOCACY: CANDOUR & CONCISION ESSENTIAL GUIDANCE FROM CANADA

August 11, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Uncategorized, Written advocacy

One of the advantages of writing a blog is that you can point out useful posts and articles. Anyone involved in legal argument benefit the guidance by John L Laskin J.A. in Forget the Wind-Up and Make the Pitch Some…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND COSTS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: NO DOUBLE STANDARDS FOR THE GOVERNMENT

June 22, 2015 · by gexall · in Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In The Queen (on the application of Bhatt) -v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 1724 (Admin) Helen Mountfield QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge) made some interesting observations in relation to the Denton principles, conduct…

LENGTHY BUNDLES AND INTERIM COSTS: OBSERVATIONS FROM THE TECHNOLOGY & CONSTRUCTION COURT

February 18, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The two judgments of Mr Justice Akenhead in the Secretary of State for the Home Environment -v- Raythean Systems Limited [2014] EWHC 4375 (TCC) and [2015] EWHC 311 (TCC) contain some familiar motifs in relation to the size of bundles,…

GET BUNDLES AND SKELETON ARGUMENTS TO COURT – OR ELSE: CHIEF CONSTABLE COPS IT

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Serving documents, Written advocacy

There is a brief report on Lawtel today of the case of Marsh -v- Ministry of Justice (QB Phillips J 20/01/2015)*. It provides an object lesson on the need for all parties (and non-parties) to lodge – or re-lodge -…

MORE ON SKELETON ARGUMENTS: DO THEM PROPERLY OR YOU DON'T GET PAID (THE TRIQUEL)

November 25, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Written advocacy

For the third time in the past few months Jackson L.J. has spoken out against over-lengthy skeleton arguments. The costs of preparing those skeletons have been disallowed on each occasion. This is what happened in Inplayer Ltd -v- Thorogood [2014]…

THE ROLE OF THE APPELLATE COURT IN CONSIDERING FINDINGS OF FACT

October 15, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Clydesdale Bank -v- Duffy [2014] EWCA Civ 1260 the Court of Appeal set out a clear statement of the limited role of the appeal court in considering appeals in relation to findings of fact by the trial judge. THE…

DRAFTING A SKELETON OR WANT TO SERVE AN ADDITIONAL SKELETON ARGUMENT? THEN YOU HAD BETTER READ THIS

October 15, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

We have looked before at judicial complaints about the length and extent of skeleton arguments. Similar grievances can be seen in the judgment of the Court of Appeal earlier this week in Tchenguiz -v- Director of the Serious Fraud Office…

TRIAL PREPARATION, BUNDLES & WITNESS STATEMENTS: THE JUDGE'S LAMENT

October 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The earlier post on the decision in Weathford -v- Hydropath  concentrated upon the application for a non-party costs order.  However in the primary judgment on liability the judge made some all too common criticisms in relation to trial preparation, skeleton…

USELESS BUNDLES; LENGTHY SKELETONS AND JUDICIAL IRE: THE COURT OF APPEAL RUES INABILITY TO IMPOSE "OLD FASHIONED" SANCTIONS

USELESS BUNDLES; LENGTHY SKELETONS AND JUDICIAL IRE: THE COURT OF APPEAL RUES INABILITY TO IMPOSE "OLD FASHIONED" SANCTIONS

July 10, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Written advocacy

This is not the first time CLB has commented on judicial complaints about over-long skeletons and poorly thought out bundles.  These points are made again by the Court of Appeal in Caldero Trading -v- Leibson [2014] EWCA Civ 935. The…

SKELETON ARGUMENTS: MORE EXAMPLES ON LINE: YOU CAN HAVE COTTON IF YOU CAN'T HAVE SILK

May 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Members Content, Uncategorized, Written advocacy

I have posted recently about judicial exasperation about the length of skeleton arguments, with the costs of the skeletons being disallowed in full. One difficulty that many students and junior practitioners face is that there are few skeleton arguments that…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 35.2K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • MAZUR RECORDING – NOW AVAILABLE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON’T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT…
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE “CONDUCT OF LITIGATION”? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS
  • PART 36: SHOULD THE COURT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION SO THAT THE NORMAL PART 36 PROVISIONS DO NOT APPLY? THE HIGH COURT CONSIDERS THE “FORMIDABLE OBSTACLE”…

Top Posts

  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON'T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT...
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION"? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS
  • MAZUR RECORDING - NOW AVAILABLE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 8: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION" (1): HOW HELPFUL ARE THE REGULATORS?
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2023
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.