Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.
Browse: Home » Summary assessment of costs
NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 12TH SEPTEMBER 2025 AND THE 1ST OCTOBER 2025 (1): COSTS

NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 12TH SEPTEMBER 2025 AND THE 1ST OCTOBER 2025 (1): COSTS

July 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

Here we look at the latest statutory instrument which makes changes to the rules.  We are starting by looking at the changes in relation to the rules relating to costs. These provisions come into force on the 1st October 2025….

COST BITES 244: WHEN ARE INDEMNITY COSTS APPROPRIATE? SHOULD THE FEES OF JUNIOR COUNSEL BE RECOVERED IN FULL? A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT  IN THE COMMERCIAL COURT CONSIDERED

COST BITES 244: WHEN ARE INDEMNITY COSTS APPROPRIATE? SHOULD THE FEES OF JUNIOR COUNSEL BE RECOVERED IN FULL? A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT IN THE COMMERCIAL COURT CONSIDERED

June 16, 2025 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

I periodically remind people (and remind myself) that one of the purposes of this series is to look at what is happening “on the ground” in relation to costs, including the summary assessment of costs.  Practitioners may only have limited…

COST BITES 233: VARDY -v- ROONEY: SOME EXTRA TIME ON THE COSTS ISSUES: CLAIMANT'S CONDUCT DID NOT CROSS THE LINE -NO REDUCTION OF COSTS OF APPEAL

COST BITES 233: VARDY -v- ROONEY: SOME EXTRA TIME ON THE COSTS ISSUES: CLAIMANT’S CONDUCT DID NOT CROSS THE LINE -NO REDUCTION OF COSTS OF APPEAL

April 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

In Rebekah Vardy v Coleen Rooney [2025] EWHC 1027 (KB) Mr Justice Cavanagh made some further costs rulings following the dismissal of the defendant’s appeal on issues relating to costs.  Firstly he rejected the defendant’s arguments that the claimant’s costs should be…

HAPPY NEW YEAR: THE NEW SOLICITORS' GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES FOR 2025

HAPPY NEW YEAR: THE NEW SOLICITORS’ GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES FOR 2025

January 1, 2025 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

January 1st sees the introduction of the indexed hourly rates. They are published on the Gov.UK website here.    THE RATES FOR 2025   Grade Fee earner London 1 London 2 London 3 National 1 National 2 A Solicitors and…

COST BITES 199: HIGHER LONDON RATE CAN BE USED FOR A SPECIFIC APPLICATION, EVEN IF LOWER RATES MAY APPLY LATER

COST BITES 199: HIGHER LONDON RATE CAN BE USED FOR A SPECIFIC APPLICATION, EVEN IF LOWER RATES MAY APPLY LATER

December 6, 2024 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

The judgment of ICC Judge Barber in Brierley v Howe & Anor (Re Costs – 36 Bourne Street Ltd) [2024] EWHC 2983 (Ch) raises the interesting question as to whether the complexity of an application should lead to the solicitor’s…

COST BITES 169: AN EXAMPLE OF A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN ACTION

COST BITES 169: AN EXAMPLE OF A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN ACTION

July 14, 2024 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content, Webinar

There is an interesting example of a summary assessment of costs in action in the judgment of Mr Andrew Twigger KC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) in Wootton & Anor v Wootton & Ors (Re Costs)…

COST BITES 144: SUMMARY ASSESSMENT, REDUCED FROM £42,267 TO £22,000: A CASE IN POINT

COST BITES 144: SUMMARY ASSESSMENT, REDUCED FROM £42,267 TO £22,000: A CASE IN POINT

April 12, 2024 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

One of the aims of this series is to look at costs issues that would not normally be examined.  This is so practitioners can get a “feel” as to what actually goes on in court.  A good example of this…

COST BITES 133: £196,000 AWARDED ON A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT (IN A FAMILY CASE)

COST BITES 133: £196,000 AWARDED ON A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT (IN A FAMILY CASE)

February 13, 2024 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

The judgment of Mrs Justice Arbuthnot in  KS v VS [2024] EWHC 278 (Fam) shows why it is important that family lawyers are fully aware of the principles relating to inter-partes costs orders and also the procedures governing summary assessments. …

COST BITES 121: SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: "TO AWARD A LOWER FIGURE JUST BECAUSE REDUCTIONS ARE OFTEN MADE WOULD BE WRONG"

COST BITES 121: SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: “TO AWARD A LOWER FIGURE JUST BECAUSE REDUCTIONS ARE OFTEN MADE WOULD BE WRONG”

November 20, 2023 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

One of the aims of the “Costs Bites” series is to look at those, apparently small, aspects of cases that have a major impact on the client.   Short passages in a judgment can have a major impact on whether a…

COST BITES 13: A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN ACTION: TOO MANY LAWYERS, NO NEED FOR A QC

COST BITES 13: A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN ACTION: TOO MANY LAWYERS, NO NEED FOR A QC

August 1, 2022 · by gexall · in Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

In Lenkor Energy Trading DMCC v Puri [2022] EWHC 1958 (Comm) the court carried out a summary assessment of the defendant’s costs, the grounds for the reductions are instructive.  They show the grounds on which costs are reduced on assessment….

THE COURT SHOULD ASSESS COSTS SUMMARILY NOW: BUT THEY ARE SUBJECT TO A "SIGNIFICANT HAIRCUT"

THE COURT SHOULD ASSESS COSTS SUMMARILY NOW: BUT THEY ARE SUBJECT TO A “SIGNIFICANT HAIRCUT”

April 12, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

One of the things I regularly do on this blog is to post judgments relating to the summary assessment of costs.  These are not readily available elsewhere and this type of judgment is very popular with readers. The judgment of…

WEBINAR ON THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: 29th MARCH 2022

WEBINAR ON THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: 29th MARCH 2022

March 22, 2022 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,, Webinar

On the 29th March 2022 I am presenting a webinar on the summary assessment of costs.  This takes a detailed look at the rules, practice direction and relevant guidance. Booking details are available here.  MATTERS TO BE COVERED When a…

LAWYERS AS SCHOOCHILDREN IN THE PLAYGROUND: BAD-TEMPERED LITIGATION: THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS:  THE TAIL TO AND NOT THE DOG ITSELF

LAWYERS AS SCHOOCHILDREN IN THE PLAYGROUND: BAD-TEMPERED LITIGATION: THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: THE TAIL TO AND NOT THE DOG ITSELF

February 10, 2022 · by gexall · in Conduct, Costs, Members Content

In  Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Wright [2022] EWHC 242 (Ch) HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a High Court Judge) made some trenchant observations in relation to arguments about costs on summary assessment.  The criticisms of the way that litigation…

THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: WHEN IT IS (ABOUT) A LOTTERY

THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: WHEN IT IS (ABOUT) A LOTTERY

December 22, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

I have mentioned before how many people are interested in reading cases about the summary assessment of costs.  There is an example in the judgment of Senior Master Fontaine in  Goodram & Anor v Camelot UK Lotteries Ltd [2020] EWHC…

THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: THE DANGERS OF DEPARTING FROM THE CORRECT FORM: A "CHAOTIC" SCHEDULE OF COSTS IS NEVER GOING TO HELP YOUR CAUSE

THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: THE DANGERS OF DEPARTING FROM THE CORRECT FORM: A “CHAOTIC” SCHEDULE OF COSTS IS NEVER GOING TO HELP YOUR CAUSE

December 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

In Changing Climates Ltd v Warmaway Ltd [2021] EWHC 3117 (TCC) HHJ Sarah Watson issued a warning about departing from the standard form when seeking a summary assessment of costs after a hearing. “There is a reason that the court…

SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE PRESSED FOR TIME

SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE PRESSED FOR TIME

December 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

I am looking again at the judgment of HHJ Hodge QC in  Cohen v Fine & Ors [2020] EWHC 3278 (Ch) a because, in concentrating on the issues relating to hourly rates, the other important part of the judgment may…

HOURLY RATES ALLOWED SHOULD BE INCREASED, AT LEAST, BY INFLATION: APPEAL AGAINST SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS ALLOWED.

HOURLY RATES ALLOWED SHOULD BE INCREASED, AT LEAST, BY INFLATION: APPEAL AGAINST SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS ALLOWED.

December 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

I am grateful to Sean Linley for drawing my attention to the judgment of HHJ Hodge QC in  Cohen v Fine & Ors [2020] EWHC 3278 (Ch).That judgment has some interesting things to say in relation to current hourly rates…

THE COSTS OF PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: IS IT WORTH THE RISK? £40,000 SPENT IN COSTS FOR DOCUMENTS THAT WERE AVAILABLE UNDER GDPR

THE COSTS OF PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE: IS IT WORTH THE RISK? £40,000 SPENT IN COSTS FOR DOCUMENTS THAT WERE AVAILABLE UNDER GDPR

February 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

I am looking again at the decision in  Hussain v Medical Defence Union & Anor [2020] EWHC 157 (QB). This time I am looking at the order in relation to costs.  The application cost in excess of £40,000 in relation to…

JUDGE USES COSTS BUDGET TO ASSESS COSTS AT THE END OF A TRIAL: THE RELEVANCE OF THE BUDGET & WHEN SHOULD THE COURT GO OUTSIDE IT?

November 24, 2016 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Case Management, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Uncategorized

In Sony Communications International AB -v- SSH Communications Security Corporation [2016] EWHC 2985 (Pat) Mr Roger Wyand QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) used the costs budget to carry out an assessment of the costs at the end…

COSTS, COPYING AND PROPORTIONALITY

February 19, 2016 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,, Uncategorized

The judgment of His Honour Judge Lochrane in Ryanair Limited -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWFC B5 has attracted some attention. Here I want to look at the short judgment in relation to costs. THE CASE…

COSTS AFTER RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT

November 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized

An earlier post looked at the decision of Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart in North Midland Construction plc -v- Geo Networks Ltd [2015] 2384 (TCC).  Here we look at the subsequent order in relation to costs. THE CASE The claimant failed to…

SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: ANOTHER EXAMPLE: SAY IT WITH FLOWERS

February 11, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

We have looked, several times, at judgments which contain summary assessment of costs. Not least to get a flavour of the approach of the courts.   An assessment took place by Mr Justice Birss in Interflora -v- Marks & Spencer…

AN IMPORTANT CASE ON COSTS; "INTERESTED PARTY" COSTS; RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND SUMMARY ASSESSMENT

November 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Group M Uk Ltd -v- The Cabinet Office  [2014] EWHC 3863 (TCC) Mr Justice Akenhead mad some important observations as to the liability to pay the costs of “interested parties”; the late serving of costs schedules; relief from sanctions…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 35.2K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COSTS GROUP AT KINGS CHAMBERS – LOOKING FOR NEW MEMBERS: SEE THE ADVERT HERE
  • MAZUR RECORDING – NOW AVAILABLE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON’T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT…
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE “CONDUCT OF LITIGATION”? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS

Top Posts

  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON'T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT...
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION"? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS
  • MAZUR RECORDING - NOW AVAILABLE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 8: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION" (1): HOW HELPFUL ARE THE REGULATORS?
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2023
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.