COULD CPR 3.10 BE THE LITIGATORS NEW BEST FRIEND? THE IMPLICATIONS OF INTEGRAL PETROLEUM CONSIDERED (AND THEY ARE ENORMOUS)

March 23, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Integral Petroleum SA -v- SCU Finanz AG [2014] EWHC 702 (Comm) Popplewell held that the provisions of CPR 3.10 meant that service of the particulars of claim by e-mail could be good service and the default judgment entered thereafter a regular one. This case could have important implications f...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below

Tags: Civil Procedure Rules, CPR 3.10, CPR 3.9, Relief from sanctions

One Response

Katherine Williams · March 23, 2014 at 19:04:24 · →

Hi Hope you are well. I know you are very busy. Thanks for the blog. There are lots of decisions flying about at the moment. I thought Summit a navigation v Generali set a helpful tone to relief from sanctions as well Kind regards Katy

Sent from my iPad

Comments are closed.

← SERVICE BY E-MAIL: IMPORTANT DECISION IN INTEGRAL -v- SCU FINANZ ON CPR 3.10

MITCHELL PRINCIPLES APPLIED IN TAX TRIBUNAL →

COULD CPR 3.10 BE THE LITIGATORS NEW BEST FRIEND? THE IMPLICATIONS OF INTEGRAL PETROLEUM CONSIDERED (AND THEY ARE ENORMOUS)

One Response

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Recent Posts

Top Posts

Archives

Blogroll

Books

Useful Links

Copyright