“MULTIPLE SERIOUS ERRORS” IN JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING : THE UPPER TRIBUNAL DECISION IN FULL

September 27, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The case of AA069062014 & Ors. [2017] UKAITUR AA069062014 has already attracted considerable attention on social media and beyond. The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) considered appeals in 14 cases. The major issue was the tribunal judge. Here are the first 48 paragraphs of t...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below

Tags: Civil evidence, Civil Procedure

One Response

Pro Bono · September 28, 2017 at 10:27:27 · →

This is a vivid illustration of the dangers of appointing judges on the basis of fulfilling `diversity’ quotas rather than on merit. The role of a judge is far too important to allow political whims to affect their appointment.

Comments are closed.

← BUDGETS, ASSUMPTIONS AND AGREEMENT: GUIDANCE FROM THE BENCH: PRECEDENT R WILL HELP YOU OUT IF YOU EVER WANT TO DEPART FROM THE BUDGET

EXPERT REPORTS: “CONTENTIONS THAT SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN PURSUED AT ALL” →

“MULTIPLE SERIOUS ERRORS” IN JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING : THE UPPER TRIBUNAL DECISION IN FULL

One Response

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Recent Posts

Top Posts

Archives

Blogroll

Books

Useful Links

Copyright