SORRY SILKS: IMPORTANT AS YOU ARE THE CASE IS NOT BEING HELD UP FOR YOU: THE TAIL IS NOT GOING TO WAG THE DOG

November 13, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Fraser in Bates & Ors v Post Office Ltd [2017] EWHC 2844 (QB) contains some telling observations about case management, listing and the need to comply with the overriding objective.

"Fitting hearings around [counsel's] availability has all the disadvantages of doing a...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below

Tags: Case Management, Leading Counsel, listing

One Response

George Rosenberg · November 14, 2017 at 07:58:52 · →

But after all that sensible posturing the judge reset the date to suit counsel’s convenience. Bizarre!

Comments are closed.

← SUING THE WRONG DEFENDANT? SHOULD HAVE GONE TO SPECSAVERS?

SERVICE BY ALTERNATIVE MEANS, THE ABSENT DEFENDANT, DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND COSTS: ABSENCE OF DEFENDANT DOESN’T CAUSE THE COURT TO MISS A GEAR →

SORRY SILKS: IMPORTANT AS YOU ARE THE CASE IS NOT BEING HELD UP FOR YOU: THE TAIL IS NOT GOING TO WAG THE DOG

One Response

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Recent Posts

Top Posts

Archives

Blogroll

Books

Useful Links

Copyright