Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » listing
REVIEW OF BLOCK LISTING: HELP PIBA WITH INFORMATION ON ITS "EFFECTIVENESS" (AND THE PROBLEMS CAUSED TO THOSE WHO ARE NOT REACHED)

REVIEW OF BLOCK LISTING: HELP PIBA WITH INFORMATION ON ITS “EFFECTIVENESS” (AND THE PROBLEMS CAUSED TO THOSE WHO ARE NOT REACHED)

April 22, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Members Content

Every so often the MOJ has periods of “block listing” events at the Royal Court of Justice.  Essentially many Fast Track cases are listed and many dozens of litigants turn up in the hope of having their cases heard.  This…

MORE ON LAST MINUTE ADJOURNMENTS: SERIOUS CASES PULLED FROM THE LIST AT THE LAST MOMENT (AND CLAIMANTS HAVING TO PAY FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF EXTENDING THE LISTING PERIOD)

May 7, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Adjournments, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Listing, Members Content

I am continuing to collect issues relating to listing. Doing this by a serious of posts on the topic.  You can get a flavour of the problems by some of the issues raised on Twitter over the past few days. …

LISTING - WAITING TWO YEARS FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL: 10 MONTHS TO HEAR AN APPLICATION: THIS IS NOT A MODERN JUSTICE SYSTEM

LISTING – WAITING TWO YEARS FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL: 10 MONTHS TO HEAR AN APPLICATION: THIS IS NOT A MODERN JUSTICE SYSTEM

April 15, 2018 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Adjournments, Civil Procedure, Listing, Members Content

I’m quite happy to carry on posting about listing issues.  Litigants should not suffer in silence.  I post these three reports without comment. Delay of 10 months for listing of applications “Fast track personal injury claim in Central London County…

COURT LISTING - JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT IT COULDN'T GET ANY WORSE

COURT LISTING – JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT IT COULDN’T GET ANY WORSE

April 11, 2018 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Case Management, Listing, Members Content

I wasn’t planning a regular series on the vagaries of court listing.  I post these without comment. Both from Twitter today. Parties not told of an adjournment Barrister Banter  ‏@balchinlawyer 11 So at Court to discover case was adjourned a week ago…

PROBLEMS WITH LISTING: A CONTINUING SAGA

PROBLEMS WITH LISTING: A CONTINUING SAGA

April 9, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Adjournments, Civil Procedure, Listing, Members Content

Complaints about listing continue. Some are put as comments to the original post on this blog, some use the #courtlisting  hashtag on Twitter.  This is just a flavour of complaints in the last week. Three months to acknowledge receipt of…

THE SECRET BARRISTER - WHERE DO I START? (1) LETS TRY LISTING

THE SECRET BARRISTER – WHERE DO I START? (1) LETS TRY LISTING

March 25, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Book Review, Listing, Members Content

Like many of the legal fraternity I have spent this weekend reading the Secret Barrister’s “Stories of the Law and how its Broken”.   The book is about criminal law and criminal procedure, however there is much for civil litigators to…

OVER-LISTING HAS CONSEQUENCES : (SO DOES TALKING OVER YOUR OPPONENT): HEARINGS SHOULD NOT BECOME A "SHOUTING MATCH"

OVER-LISTING HAS CONSEQUENCES : (SO DOES TALKING OVER YOUR OPPONENT): HEARINGS SHOULD NOT BECOME A “SHOUTING MATCH”

March 22, 2018 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There is a page on this blog where I am attempting to collate problems with listing (across all jurisdictions).  The judgment reported today in  A v R & Anor (Appeal of Summary Determination) [2018] EWHC 521 provides a reminder that listing…

COURT WATCH: DON'T SUFFER IN SILENCE: REPORT CANCELLATIONS AND LISTING ISSUES HERE

COURT WATCH: DON’T SUFFER IN SILENCE: REPORT CANCELLATIONS AND LISTING ISSUES HERE

March 20, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Adjournments, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There have been constant, and consistent, grumblings on social media about problems with court listing. Cases are cancelled at the last moment. Courts are overbooked. There appears to be no, or very little, thought given to the expense involved and…

SORRY SILKS: IMPORTANT AS YOU ARE THE CASE IS NOT BEING HELD UP FOR YOU: THE TAIL IS NOT GOING TO WAG THE DOG

SORRY SILKS: IMPORTANT AS YOU ARE THE CASE IS NOT BEING HELD UP FOR YOU: THE TAIL IS NOT GOING TO WAG THE DOG

November 13, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Fraser in Bates & Ors v Post Office Ltd [2017] EWHC 2844 (QB) contains some telling observations about case management, listing and the need to comply with the overriding objective. “Fitting hearings around [counsel’s] availability has…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: WHEN A LITIGATOR MAKES A STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THEIR CLIENT: A USEFUL CHECKLIST ON THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF
  • EXPERT WATCH 56: A SECTION OF A JUDGMENT THAT SPECIFICALLY CRITICISES A MEDICAL EXPERT: “I WAS STRUCK BY THE ABSENCE OF A RIGOROUS AND CAREFUL MULTIDISCPLINARY APPROACH TO THIS ISSUES IN THIS CASE”
  • EXPERT WATCH 55: WAS THIS WAR? (OR CAUSED BY WAR): TRIAL JUDGE CONSIDERS THE EVIDENCE OF TWO EXPERTS ON GEOPOLITICS, BUT FINDS ONE IS PARTISAN
  • PERSONAL INJURY MATTERS 17 (1): LIABILITY CATCHUP (1): PUB OPERATOR IS NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR DOORMEN’S ACTS: A CONCLUSION REACHED “WITH REGRET”
  • COST BITES 411: HOW DOES A COURT DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF AN INTERIM PAYMENT AS TO COSTS WHEN THE CASE HAS NOT BEEN BUDGETED? SHOULD A PAYMENT BE ORDERED AT ALL?

Top Posts

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: AS STRONGLY WORDED A REFUSAL AS I HAVE SEEN: THE CONCEPT "DOES NOT EMBODY A PRINCIPLE OF "BREACH NOW REPENT LATER"
A SOLICITOR SHOULD JUST NOT BE SAYING THIS IS IN A WITNESS STATEMENT: IT "STRAYED WELL BEYOND WHAT SHE COULD LEGALLY GIVE EVIDENCE ABOUT FROM HER OWN KNOWLEDGE INCLUDED HEARSAY FROM AN UNNAMED SOURCE AND INCLUDED STATEMENTS OF OPINION WHICH SHE DID NOT HAVE THE EXPERTISE TO GIVE..."
THE ONLINE PROCEDURE (RULES AND PRACTICE DIRECTIONS) RULES 2026 COME INTO FORCE ON THE 7th SEPTEMBER: HERE IS A SUMMARY (AND THE RULES THEMSLVES)
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LITIGATION: AN UPDATE ON CONSULTATION FINDINGS FROM THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL
WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG IN LITIGATION (AND STOPPING IT HAPPENING TO YOU) 2: ADVISING A CLIENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LIABLE FOR COSTS BECAUSE PROCEEDINGS HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.