COURT LISTING – JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT IT COULDN’T GET ANY WORSE
I wasn’t planning a regular series on the vagaries of court listing. I post these without comment. Both from Twitter today.
One Response
Comments are closed.
Copyright
© Gordon Exall, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2020.
Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission from this blog's author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Gordon Exall and Civil Litigation Brief with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- REMOTE HEARINGS: BUT WHAT ABOUT “WITNESS DEMEANOUR”?
- REMOTE HEARING IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION: 17 PARTICIPANTS, 11 WITNESSES AND TWO JOURNALISTS: LESSONS TO BE LEARNT
- THE FIRST VIRTUAL TRIAL IN THE COMMERCIAL COURT – READ ALL ABOUT IT
- MORE USEFUL GUIDANCE ON BUNDLES AND VIRTUAL HEARINGS
- REMOTE HELP FOR PUPILS (1): PUPILLAGE FORM/INTERVIEW CLINIC
Top Posts & Pages
- REMOTE HEARINGS: BUT WHAT ABOUT "WITNESS DEMEANOUR"?
- THE FIRST VIRTUAL TRIAL IN THE COMMERCIAL COURT - READ ALL ABOUT IT
- REMOTE HEARING IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION: 17 PARTICIPANTS, 11 WITNESSES AND TWO JOURNALISTS: LESSONS TO BE LEARNT
- MORE USEFUL GUIDANCE ON BUNDLES AND VIRTUAL HEARINGS
- CIVIL LITIGATION AND COVID-19: GUIDANCE from 2TG
Blogroll
Books
Useful Links
Archives
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies.
To find out more, as well as how to remove or block these, see here: Our Cookie Policy
To find out more, as well as how to remove or block these, see here: Our Cookie Policy
Surely in the second case it would have been worth flying in an interpreter from abroad. It would have cost a great deal less than losing 4 days of a trial.