TRYING TO LODGE ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS SIX WEEKS AFTER THE HEARING: SUPREME COURT SAYS NO

There is a short footnote to the judgment of the Supreme Court in  Tindall and another (Appellants) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police (Respondent) [2024] UKSC 33. It contains a warning to all of those advocates (that is probably every practising advocate) who feels that they could, or should...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below