THIS IS NOT EXPERT OPINION BUT “ARGUMENTS” SAYS THE JUDGE: PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT NOT GIVEN

In  Norman v N & CJ Horton Property [2024] EWHC 2994 (Ch) Master Clark found that proposed "expert evidence" was not evidence at all but simply opinions.  The person preparing the report was not allowed to give expert evidence on the issue of whether money laundering had taken place, this was a ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below