LATE AND “HAPHAZARD” SERVICE OF TRIAL BUNDLES LEADS TO WASTED COSTS ORDER AGAINST CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS (ON THE INDEMNITY BASIS)
There are numerous cases on this blog about trial bundles. The issues never seem to end and have not been solved by the advent of the electronic bundle. This can be seen in the judgment of Deputy High Court Judge…
PROVING THINGS 243: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: THE ACCURACY OF WITNESSES & “STORY CREEP”: GIVING THE DEFENDANT A FIVE STAR REVIEW IS NOT A STRONG BASIS FOR AN ACTION IN NEGLIGENCE
The result of clinical negligence cases sometimes rest on the views of expert witnesses. Sometimes it is the evidence of witnesses with different recollections of events. On many occasions it is the two issues combined. In Deakin-Stephenson v Behar &…
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDICIAL REVIEW COURT 2024: TIME LIMITS AND PROCEDURAL RIGOUR
The latest Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide is now available and can be found here. It is dated October 2014 but was published yesterday – well ahead of time. I am simply highlighting two aspects of the Guide. “…
WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESS EVIDENCE AND COMPLIANCE: CLAIMANT ORDERED TO FILE COMPLIANT WITNESS STATEMENTS: IT COULD HAVE BEEN THE SOLICITORS NECK ON THE LINE…
We are returning to the judgment of Chief Master Shuman in In IlliquidX Ltd v Altana Wealth Ltd & Ors [2024] EWHC 2191 (Ch). This time looking at the issues relating to witness statements. There is a detailed consideration of the rules,…
PROVING THINGS 242: THE CLAIMANT WHO WAS GIVEN A SECOND CHANCE TO PROVE HIS DAMAGES CLAIM
We are looking again at the judgment of Mr Justice Julian Knowles in Allard v Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd [2024] EWHC 2227 (KB). This was looked at earlier in relation to the trial judge’s observations about the wholly inadequate counter-schedule. However…
PART 36: FIXED COSTS AND THE TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS: DELAY IN ISSUING COSTS PROCEEDINGS MEANT THAT CLAIMANT’S COSTS WERE ASSESSED AT NIL
In Bi -v- Tesco Underwriting Limited HHJ Sephton KC found that the claimant’s delay in issuing costs proceedings meant that the costs were subject to the fixed costs provisions and should be assessed at nil. I am grateful to barrister…
WHEN YOU WANT A COURT ORDER BUT DON’T THINK THERE IS ANYONE TO SUE: THINK AGAIN
In Hughes Family Property Co Ltd & Anor v No Defendant [2024] EWHC 2288 (Ch) HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a High Court Judge) considered a case where the claimants wanted a declaration from the court, but believed that there…
A SMALL POINT TO WATCH WHEN COMING OFF THE RECORD: YOU HAVE TO GIVE AN ADDRESS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION
In Madison Pacific Trust Ltd v Groza & Anor [2024] EWHC 2307 (Comm) Mr Justice Bryan pointed out an essential requirement for a solicitor who wants to come off the record. The Notice of Change has to give an address…
DRAFTING EFFECTIVE ATTENDANCE NOTES IN LITIGATION: COST EFFECTIVE DELEGATION FOR LITIGATORS: SOME FUNDAMENTAL POINTS ADDRESSED IN TWO WEBINARS
Last week I had the pleasure of giving a lecture, alongside many of my colleagues in the costs team in chambers. There were about 100 lawyers present, many with considerable experience. I was able to take a straw poll of…
COST BITES 182: ANOTHER CASE OF A CLAIMANT PAYING THE COSTS OF A BUDGETING HEARING BECAUSE OF AN UNREALISTIC APPROACH
In Jenkins v Thurrock Council [2024] EWHC 2248 (KB) Master Thornett revisited the principles considered in Worcester v Hopley [2024] EWHC 2181 (KB) It was held that the claimant’s unrealistic figures in a costs budget should lead to the claimant paying…
WHEN A PARTY IS BANKRUPT: WEBINAR ON THE 16th SEPTEMBER 2024: AN IMPORTANT TOPIC THAT MAY HELP FLOAT YOUR BOAT
In The Mayor And Burgesses of the London Borough of Richmond v Trotman [2024] EWHC 2145 (KB) Mr Justice Kerr was critical of the claimant’s failure to consider the consequences of the defendant being bankrupt. Insolvency issues in litigation…
“IN CONTRACT YOU BARGAIN FOR A RESULT”: JUDGE UPHOLDS COMPANY’S CLAIM FOR 20% OF COMPENSATION RECEIVED
I am grateful to Martin Hirst for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Holmes in NC Investigating Services Ltd -v- Crossley (1st March 2024), a copy of which is available here OT APPROVED, MHIRST, H1QZ65P0, NCINVESTIGATION, CROSSLEY,…
CLAIMANT’S (LATE) APPLICATION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE DISMISSED:”LITIGATION NEEDS TO BE CONDUCTED EFFICIENTLY AND AT PROPORTIONATE COST”
In IlliquidX Ltd v Altana Wealth Ltd & Ors [2024] EWHC 2191 (Ch) Chief Master Shuman dismissed the claimant’s application to rely on expert evidence. It was held that the application was made too late and, in any event, not…
DRAFTING PLEADINGS: THERE ARE RULES YOU KNOW – THE KINGS BENCH GUIDE CONSIDERED: “PLAIN AND OBVIOUS” DEFICIENCIES WILL LEAD TO PROBLEMS
In Sammut & Ors v Next Steps Mental Healthcare Ltd & Anor [2024] EWHC 2265 (KB) HHJ Bird (sitting as Judge of the High Court) made some important observations on the way in which the Particulars of Claim were drafted….
THE COUNCIL MUST PAY THE COSTS OF ITS EXPERT’S CHANGE OF MIND: THE DUTY TO TEST THE STRENGTH OF THE CASE WITH AN EXPERT CONSIDERED
There is an interesting consideration of the duties relating to the interplay between lawyer and expert in the judgment of Fordham J in Halton Borough Council, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and…
A TRIBUTE TO THE LATE (AND GREAT) SIMON (“SPIKE”) MULLINGS: “STAY SAFE EVERYONE AND MAKE SURE YOU HUG YOUR LOVED ONES”
I was devastated to learn of the death of Simon Mullings over the weekend. The tributes that have been paid from housing lawyers and many others have reflected his position as one of the foremost housing practitioners and campaigners. Giles…
“IT IS ENTIRELY OUTSIDE THE REMIT OF AN EXPERT TO DECIDE WHICH WITNESSES OF FACT HE BELIEVES OR DISBELIEVES”: DEFENDANT’S WITNESS DOES NOT FARE WELL
We are returning to the judgment of Mr Justice Julian Knowles in Allard v Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd [2024] EWHC 2227 (KB). More accurately to the first instance decision which the defendant attempted (unsuccessfully) to appeal. This time in relation to…
MAKING APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT: A PRACTITIONER’S GUIDE: WEBINAR 10th SEPTEMBER 2024
It is surprising how many applications are made which do not comply with the most basic requirements of procedure and evidence. This webinar on the 10th September 2024 aims to help practitioners avoid errors and aims to ensure that participants…
BRINGING A REPRESENTATIVE ACTION WAS A FLIGHT OF FANCY: ACTION ON BEHALF OF NUMEROUS PASSENGERS STRUCK OUT
In Smyth v British Airways Plc & Anor [2024] EWHC 2173 (KB) Master Davison struck out an action which claimed to be a “representative action” on behalf of thousands (if not millions) of airline passengers. The judge was sceptical about…
DRAFTING COUNTER-SCHEDULES SOME ADVICE: WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM MY FRIENDS AND A FEW CASES ALONG THE WAY
The post last week on the judgment in Allard v Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd [2024] EWHC 2227 (KB) has led me to revisit an earlier post giving advice on the drafting of counter-schedules. That post contained advice from the social media…
COST BITES 181: WHAT PERCENTAGE SHOULD BE PAID ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS?
In Matrix Receivables Ltd v Musst Holdings Ltd (Re Costs) [2024] EWHC 2245 (Ch) Mr Justice Freedman considered the appropriate approach to an interim payment on costs. He rejected the argument that the appropriate percentage was 70% and found, on…
A COUNTER-SCHEDULE THAT TOTALLY TOTALLY FAILED TO DO ITS JOB: COURT REFUSES PERMISSION FOR DEFENDANT TO RELY ON COUNTER-SCHEDULE THAT “SERVES NO PURPOSE WHATSOEVER”
This blog has looked extensively at judicial criticism of schedules of damages over the years. It has to be remembered that counter-schedules also have to be properly drafted. This is emphasised. in the judgment of Mr Justice Julian Knowles in…
A TRIAL BUNDLE THAT WAS A “CHAOTIC MESS”; NON COMPLIANT WITNESS STATEMENTS AND EXPERT REPORTS AND “PROCEDURAL TRENCH WARFARE”
There are interesting procedural aspects in the judgment of Simon Gleeson in Carl v Hawkins & Ors [2024] EWHC 2186 (Ch). The case, about historic sports cars, involved (among other things) “procedural trench warfare”; highly defective bundles; non-compliant witness statements;…
VALUATION EXPERTS SHOULD SHOW THEIR CALCULATIONS: ESTIMATING A VALUE AND WORKING BACKWARDS TO JUSTIFY THAT DOES NOT FIND FAVOUR WITH THE COURT
In Sahota v Sahota & Ors [2024] EWHC 2165 (Ch) HHJ Rawlings (sitting as a High Court Judge)was critical of an expert witness who, in essence, worked backwards in relation to a valuation. The judge found that having come to…
COST BITES 180: EXCESSIVE BUDGET LEADS TO PARTY BEING ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS OF A BUDGETING HEARING
In Nicholas Worcester v Dr Philip Hopley [2024] EWHC 2181 (KB) Master Thornett awarded costs against a party who, the Master felt, had over-inflated their costs budget. The case stands as a warning that a party putting forward a budget which is…
WITNESS STATEMENTS, WITNESSES, EVIDENCE AND PSYCHOLOGY: GUIDANCE FROM THE EAST: ANOTHER EXAMPLE FROM A DECADE AGO THAT REMAINS RELEVANT
We are looking again at the skills necessary to take accurate witness statements. Here we revisit a real gem of an article by Ula Cartwright-Finch and Alex Waksman of Herbert Smith Freehills on the accuracy of witness statements and the…
A WORKING EXAMPLE OF THE DANGERS OF NOT TAKING A FULL WITNESS STATEMENT: DISASTER CAN STRIKE: A DECADE ON AND THIS CASE IS STILL RELEVANT
One case I regularly refer to when speaking, or writing, about taking witness statements is the decision of Judge Keyser Q.C. In Kellie & Kellie -v- Wheatley & Lloyd Architects Ltd [2014] EWHC 2866(TCC). This case gives a working example…
NO “VYING AND REVYING”: WITNESS STATEMENTS, EVIDENCE AND LOTS OF OTHER MATERIAL BESIDES: AFTER 287 YEARS OF JUDICIAL PROMPTING HAVE PRACTITIONERS GOT THE MESSAGE?
Anyone involved in civil litigation will spend a great deal of their time reading witness “evidence” which, in reality, is no such thing. Witness statements tend to be seen as an opportunity to put forward opinions, submissions and innuendo. As…
ENTERING JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT: NO DUTY ON THE PARTIES TO HELP EACH OTHER: THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING THE RULES
There are some interesting observations in the judgment of HHJ Cadwallader (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) in Thiscompany Ltd & Ors v Welsh & Ors [2024] EWHC 2159 (Comm). It was a case where three of the…
COST BITES 179: CHALLENGING A PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT: CLAIMANT’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES LEADS TO CHALLENGE BEING REJECTED
In Christodoulides v Holbech [2024] EWHC 2172 (SCCO) Deputy Costs Judge Roy KC refused a claimant’s application to revisit a provisional assessment. The claimant (the paying party) had not complied with the rules when attempting to challenge the bill and…
THE AUTOMATIC STAY UNDER CPR 15.11 AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: A CASE IN POINT
In Michael Wilson & Partners, Ltd v Short [2024] EWHC 2113 (Ch) Master Clark granted the claimant relief from sanctions in a case that had become automatically stayed under CPR 15.11. This case serves as a reminder, if nothing else,…
COST BITES 178: VALIDITY AND ENFORCEABILITY OF CONTENTIOUS BUSINESS AGREEMENT UPHELD ON APPEAL
In Finnan v Candey Ltd [2024] EWHC 2157 (Ch) HHJ Cadwaller dismissed an appeal against a finding that a solicitor and client had entered into a valid contentious business agreement. The judge held that the finding below, that the appellant…
IF YOU ARE GOING TO PROPOSE CHANGES TO A DRAFT JUDGMENT THE OTHER SIDE MUST BE NOTIFIED FIRST
The judgment of Ms. Pat Treacy (setting as a judge of the Chancery Division) in Parsons v Convatec Ltd [2024] EWHC 2111 (Pat) contains a reminder of the importance of a party notifying the other side immediately if they are going…
PROVING THINGS 241: “WHICH WITNESS’S ACCOUNT IS PREFERRED?”: CONTEMPORARY EVIDENCE IS BEST
In Gadsby v Hayes [2024] EWHC 2142 (KB) Ms Clare Ambrose (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) considered the evidence of witnesses in a case where the accident had happened ten years previously. The accounts given near the time…
COST BITES 177: SUCCESSFUL CLAIMANT RECOVERS ONLY 20% OF ITS COSTS (STILL GETS AN INTERIM PAYMENT OF £2 MILLION)
In Tata Consultancy Services Ltd v Disclosure and Barring Service [2024] EWHC 2025 (TCC) Mr Justice Constable found that a “successful” claimant who had recovered nearly £3.7 million in damages should only recover 20% of its costs. Both parties had…
NON-COMPLIANT WITNESS STATEMENTS (AGAIN): THE SOLICITOR’S STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WAS “FALSE”:
For the third time this week I find myself writing about judicial criticisms of the way in which witness statements have been prepared. This case has by far the most excoriating comments. In Fulstow & Anor v Francis [2024] EWHC…
CLAIMANT’S FAILURE TO PAY COSTS LEADS TO PEREMPTORY ORDER BEING MADE: PUT UP OR SHUT UP…
In Ceto Shipping Corporation v Savory Shipping Inc [2024] EWHC 1897 (Comm) Mr Justice Butcher made a peremptory order following the claimant’s failure to pay costs that had been ordered in interlocutory applications and in other related proceedings. “In the…
STRIKING OUT FOR DELAY: THE DANGERS FOR A COUNTERCLAIMING DEFENDANT IN LETTING SLEEPING DOGS LIE
In Western Avenue Properties Ltd & Anor v SONI & Anor [2024] EWHC 2124 (KB) Master Davison struck out a counterclaim on the grounds of delay. The claim had already been struck out for delay. In these circumstances the principles…
PROVING THINGS 240: PROVING THE “EELES” CRITERIA ON AN APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM PAYMENT: GAPS IN THE EVIDENCE PREVENT A FINAL DETERMINATION BEING MADE
In XS1 (A Child) v West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2024] EWHC 1865 (KB) Master Stevens adjourned a claimant’s application for a substantial interim payment. The primary ground for this was that there was insufficient evidence before the court to…
KEEPING UP TO DATE WITH THIS BLOG? X NO LONGER MARKS THE SPOT
For many years this blog has run alongside a Twitter (“X”) account – @CivilLitTweet. That account was started at the same time as the blog and (initially) all posts on the blog were sent automatically to Twitter. That facility stopped…
FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES FOR WITNESS STATEMENTS FOR THOSE NOT PROFICIENT IN ENGLISH – “DISAPPOINTINGLY A NOT INFREQUENT OCCURRENCE”
In SZ Solicitors -v- Bharj [2024] 8WLUK 65 HHJ Monty KC dealt with the problems that arose when a party had not complied with the rules in relation to providing a witness statement for a witness who is not proficient…
THREE WEBINARS: MAKING APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT; INSOLVENCY AND SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER
In September and October there are a number of webinars relating to procedure and evidence. Firstly on the essential issue (but often overlooked) elements and rules relating to making applications to the court; secondly on insolvency and personal injury and…
WITNESS STATEMENTS: PD57AC “MORE HONOURED IN THE BREACH THAN THE OBSERVANCE”: AND THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES
In KSY Juice Blends UK Ltd v Citrosuco GmbH [2024] EWHC 2098 (Comm) HHJ Pearce (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) observed that the requirements for drafting witness statements in PD57AC were “more honoured in the breach than…
SELF PROTECTION FOR LITIGATION LAWYERS – A RECAP: WITNESS STATEMENTS UNDER SCRUTINY
A report in Litigation Futures in August 2016 illustrates the need for “self protection” by lawyers in . The headline says it all “Insurance Fraudster who tried to blame his solicitor jailed for 18 months”. “IT WAS ALL MY…
AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON 1st OCTOBER 2024: A QUICK OVERVIEW
The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.3) Rules 2024 come into force on the 1st October. We will be looking at some of the provisions in detail nearer the time. The new rules can be found here. In the interim period here…
“TRENCH WARFARE OF THE MOST ATTRITIONAL KIND”: ALLEGATIONS OF NON-DISCLOSURE AND THE LAW OF DIMINISHING RETURNS: “QUALITY NOT QUANTITY SHOULD BE THE WATCHWORD”
There are some interesting observations in the Court of Appeal judgment today in MEX Group Worldwide Limited v Stewart Owen Ford & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 959 about the way cases should be presented in relation to allegations of non-disclosure. The Court…
SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM ISSUES: CLAIMANT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS: HIGH COURT UPHOLDS THE EXTENSIONS OF TIME
The judgment of Mrs Justice Hill in Graham v Fidelidade – Companhia De Seguros SA [2024] EWHC 2010 (KB) contains some salutary lessons for litigators. In particular the importance of complying the the rules for applying for extensions of time…
COST BITES 176: A WARNING TO ALL WOULD BE INTERVENORS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: IT COULD BE COSTLY (£110,000 IN THIS CASE)
In Betta Oceanway Company v SC Tomini Trading SR (Re Costs) [2024] EWHC 2068 (Comm) Mr Stephen Hofmeyr KC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) held that a person who unsuccessfully sought to intervene in civil proceedings…
CAN A COURT STRIKE OUT A CASE ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE CLAIMANT HAS NO REAL INTENTION OF PROCEEDING TO TRIAL? IT CAN – BUT NOT IN THIS CASE
In Lloyd v Hayward & Anor [2024] EWHC 2033 (Ch) HHJ Keyser KC (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) considered the question of whether the delay in the progress of an action should lead to it being struck…
DAMAGES IN ANTICIPATION OF DEATH AND DAMAGES FOR LOSSES PRIOR TO DEATH: WEBINAR 12th AUGUST 2024
This webinar looks at the difficult areas of (i) losses in anticipation of death, when a claimant has a reduced life expectancy; (ii) losses prior to death, including financial losses and pain and suffering. It provides practical guidance on order…
You must be logged in to post a comment.