WHEN YOU LEAVE IT UNTIL THE LAST MINUTE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER: THE COURT HAS VERY LITTLE SYMPATHY – WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED?
A common feature of litigation is the leaving of matters until the last minute. Be it service of the claim form, costs budgets or compliance with a court order. Here we have a case of a party delaying in complying…
A QUICK NOTE ABOUT CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP: HOW TO ADD COLLEAGUES (AND WHAT TO DO IF YOU WANT MORE THAN 50 MEMBERS)
This is the first day of this site as a subscription site and people have been very supportive. There have been very few teething problems. It will help if I address two issues: (i) how to add colleagues if you…
“ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE” ON TRIAL: WHEN QUESTIONED CHAT GPT WILL TELL YOU ITS MADE THINGS UP: THIS IS “A HALLUCINATION RATHER THAN A REAL LEGAL AUTHORITY”
Artificial Intelligence and legal “research” has been very much in the news of late. I am grateful to my colleague Steven Turner for sending me an example where, upon being questioned, Chat GPT readily conceded that a case it had…
NEW COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) GUIDE 2025: A USEFUL LINK TO AN ESSENTIAL GUIDE
A new Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Guide has been published. It provides an essential guide to Court of Appeal cases. THE PURPOSE OF THE GUIDE “The main purpose of this Guide is to set out as clearly as…
HOW FAR IS A SOLICITOR’S ESTIMATE OF COSTS BINDING? THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED: A HIGH COURT APPEAL
Many, if not all, litigators will be familiar with the scenario whereby an estimate of costs is given and events develop so that the estimate is overtaken. This scenario was considered in the case we are considering today. An estimate…
SHOULD A PARTY BE ABLE TO INSTRUCT THEIR OWN EXPERT WHEN THEY DISAGREE WITH THE REPORT OF A JOINTLY INSTRUCTED EXPERT? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED
Here we are looking at a case where a party, dissatisfied with the approach of a jointly instructed expert, applied to the court for permission to instruct their own expert. The judgment contains a useful summary of the relevant principles….
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 16: THE CASE AGAINST ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS WAS STRUCK OUT: THE CLAIMANT CANNOT SIMPLY PLEAD “SOMEONE HERE” MUST BE TO BLAME
We are looking at a case where the court struck out the claimant’s case against three defendants because of the inadequate way in which the case was pleaded. General assertions that someone here must be to blame were not sufficient. The…
You must be logged in to post a comment.