THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 16: THE CASE AGAINST ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS WAS STRUCK OUT: THE CLAIMANT CANNOT SIMPLY PLEAD “SOMEONE HERE” MUST BE TO BLAME

We are looking at a case where the court struck out the claimant's case against three defendants because of the inadequate way in which the case was pleaded.  General assertions that someone here must be to blame were not sufficient.  The statements of case (even when heavily revised) did not enable...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below