EXPERT WATCH 7: “THIS CASE IS NOT SHORT OF ADVOCATES”: AN EXPERT REPORTING FOR THE CLAIMANT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ONE OF THEM: FURTHER THEY SHOULD HAVE DISCLOSED THAT THEY HAD “COPIED” THEIR REPORT

Yesterday I imposed a 24 hour respite on this series "unless something really interesting comes up".  I have broken that promise, it lasted 22 hours. However the cases on experts keep coming in and, I think, readers need to know about them.  Here we look at the judge's criticism of an expert who gav...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below