EXPERT WATCH 8: “SCIENCE DOES NOT CHANGE” : EVIDENCE THAT WAS “UNIMPRESSIVE IN PARTS AND OF LITTLE ASSISTANCE TO THE COURT”

To end the week I am looking at another decision about expert witnesses (it has been a theme this week). This time  we are looking at accident reconstruction experts.  One expert was found wanting, the judge favoured the other.  The reasons for the judge's scepticism of the evidence called on behalf...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below