THREE WEBINARS ON EXPERTS: THE JOINT EXPERT AND MEETING OF EXPERTS; PART 35 QUESTIONS AND EXPERTS IN THE COURTS IN 2025

The way in which the “Expert Watch” series has quickly developed shows that issues relating to expert evidence continue to give rise to problems.  These three webinars explore many of the major issues in relation to experts. Dealing with the joint expert and meeting of experts; experts considered by the court throughout this year and Part 35 questions to experts these webinars give a comprehensive review of many of the key issues and cases.

Discount for Civil Litigation Brief members

There are discounts for members of this site. Details can be found here.

The joint expert and the meeting of experts: 1st October 2025: Booking details available here.

There are a number of cases where litigants have come to grief because of the way in which experts are instructed, or where there has been found to be improper conduct at the joint meeting stage.

This webinar looks at the rules, guidance and case law in relation to both the jointly instructed expert and the meeting of experts to ensure that litigators are fully aware of the potential problem areas and how to avoid them.

Experts in the courts in 2025: 20th November 2025: booking details available here.

The courts regularly consider expert evidence and there are common criticisms and critiques of the way in which such evidence is presented.

This webinar looks at cases relating to experts throughout 2025.

It looks at examples where experts have been criticised and the practical steps that litigators (and experts) can take to avoid problems going forward.

Part 35 questions to experts a guide for practitioners and experts – The law and cases considered: 3rd December 2025: Booking details available here. 

Part 35 questions to experts play an important role in civil litigation of all types.

This webinar takes practitioners through the relevant rules, examined the case law in detail and then considers the practical implications both for legal practitioners and experts.

• When can Part 35 questions be put?
• Are questions simply confined to matters of “clarification”
• What can a party do if the questions are not answered?
• What can a party do if it considers the questions are unreasonable?
• Who pays the costs of supplying the answers