THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 35: THE DEFENDANTS’ ARGUMENT THAT THEY COULD RUN A PARTICULAR ARGUMENT ON THE BASIS OF THE CURRENT PLEADINGS WAS “NOTHING MORE THAN WISHFUL THINKING” (OR PERHAPS TANGERINE DREAMING)

Here we are looking at a pleadings issue that arose in the Intellectual Property Patents Court.   The scientific issues here may be complex, however the rules remain the same. The judge found that that the defendants' pleaded case did not allow them to run an argument that they asserted they could.
...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below