THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 68: COURT OF APPEAL HOLDS THAT THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE ALLOWED AMENDMENTS: THE PLEADINGS WERE “INCOHERENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INSUFFICIENTLY PARTICULARISED”

Here we have a rare case where the Court of Appeal overturns a decision of the first instance judge to allow a party to amend their pleadings.  There is a detailed analysis of why the proposed amendments were deficient. "I am left with a sense that, lurking within a broad and unparticularised pleadi...