THE JUDGE WAS ENTITLED TO BELIEVE THE CLAIMANT AND FIND THAT HE WAS NOT FUNDAMENTALLY DISHONEST: DEFENDANT’S APPEAL HITS A BARRIER

Here we look at what was, essentially, an attempt to appeal a trial judge's findings of fact.  It did not fare well. The judge found that the trial judge was entitled to reach the conclusions he did. The absence of a contemporary complaint of certain injuries in the medical records was far from defi...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below