EXPERT WATCH 51: THE EXPERT VALUERS SHOULD HAVE GONE INTO THIS EXERCISE “BLIND” – THEIR CREDIBILITY WOULD BE “MUCH IMPROVED”

In this case the judge expressly sets out a method of instructing the experts which would have been of more assistance to the court.  In essence that the valuation experts should have been instructed, initially, without any knowledge of the figures in dispute. "The credibility of both experts would ...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below