Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » 2026 » August » 18
COST BITES 435: ANOTHER APPLICATION TO REVISE A COSTS BUDGET (DURING A TRIAL): WITH A DIFFERENT RESULT: SOME INTERESTING COMMENTS ON CONDUCT ALONG THE WAY...

COST BITES 435: ANOTHER APPLICATION TO REVISE A COSTS BUDGET (DURING A TRIAL): WITH A DIFFERENT RESULT: SOME INTERESTING COMMENTS ON CONDUCT ALONG THE WAY…

August 18, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

We have had a number of cases relating to amending costs budgets recently.  This one has a different result.  The need to revise the budget arose from the judge’s decision that there should be a separate hearing on damages.  This,…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COST BITES 435: ANOTHER APPLICATION TO REVISE A COSTS BUDGET (DURING A TRIAL): WITH A DIFFERENT RESULT: SOME INTERESTING COMMENTS ON CONDUCT ALONG THE WAY…
  • MEMBER NEWS: HOW TO UPDATE YOUR CARD DETAILS TO MAKE SURE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION STAYS LIVE: FOUR SIMPLE STEPS IF YOU FIND THAT YOU CAN’T GET ONTO THE SITE
  • BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: LITIGATORS HAVE TO WARN THEIR CLIENTS THAT SOMETIMES A COURT MAKES NO ORDER FOR COSTS AT ALL: THE PERILS IF YOU DON’T
  • COST BITES 434 : JUDGE REFUSES TO INCREASE CLAIMANT’S BUDGET AFTER TRIAL, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT OPPOSED BY THE DEFENDANT: A PARTY MADE NO ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN WHY IT NEEDED TO SPEND THE PRICE OF THE AVERAGE UK HOUSE ON ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE
  • COST BITES 435: £4 MILLION SPENT IN COSTS AND NEITHER PARTY WILL RECOVER A PENNY FROM THE OTHER: A “PYRHHIC” VICTORY LEADS TO NO ORDER FOR COSTS…

Top Posts

AN ORDER FOR WASTED COSTS NARROWLY AVERTED - BUT THERE WERE ISSUES ON BOTH SIDES: "NONE OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONALS IN THIS CASE HAVE COVERED THEMSELVES WITH GLORY"
ADVOCACY THE JUDGE'S VIEW A RECAP OF THE SERIES 3: "THERE IS A SPECIAL RING IN HELL FOR A CERTAIN TYPE OF ADVOCATE": WHY ALL LITIGATORS SHOULD KNOW THESE THINGS...
COST BITES 435: £4 MILLION SPENT IN COSTS AND NEITHER PARTY WILL RECOVER A PENNY FROM THE OTHER: A "PYRHHIC" VICTORY LEADS TO NO ORDER FOR COSTS...
CAN DELAY IN APPLYING TO STRIKE OUT AN ACTION FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS BE AN ABUSE OF PROCESS IN ITSELF? THE DANGERS OF LETTING TIME GO BY
GIVING AN UNDERTAKING AS TO DAMAGES WHEN OBTAINING AN INJUNCTION: REMEMBER IT CAN COME BACK TO BITE (AND SOMETIMES BITE HARD...)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.