Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.
Browse: Home » Access to justice » Page 2
NO COSTS ORDER AGAINST SOLICITORS OR COUNSEL WHO WERE ACTING ON A CONDITIONAL FEE BASIS

NO COSTS ORDER AGAINST SOLICITORS OR COUNSEL WHO WERE ACTING ON A CONDITIONAL FEE BASIS

August 9, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Wasted Costs

In  Willers v Joyce & Ors [2019] EWHC 2183 (Ch) Lady Justice Rose dismissed an application for costs against solicitors and counsel who had represented an unsuccessful party on a conditional fee basis. “… there is a strong public interest…

RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND HEARINGS IN "CHAMBERS": BAR COUNCIL GUIDANCE

RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND HEARINGS IN “CHAMBERS”: BAR COUNCIL GUIDANCE

August 2, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content

I am grateful to Charles Bagot QC for referring me to the Bar Council publication “Acting as a Solicitor’s Agent”. This has a different view to those set out in earlier posts. It would be prudent for those involved in…

JOB ADVERT: DISCRIMINATION LEGAL ADVISOR: SUFFOLK LAW CENTRE.

JOB ADVERT: DISCRIMINATION LEGAL ADVISOR: SUFFOLK LAW CENTRE.

July 29, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

Suffolk Law Centre has a job vacancy. The details are below.   The vacancy can also be viewed online here.  Tackling Discrimination in the East   Part-Time Discrimination Legal Advisor   Job Share: 22.2 Hours (specific times by agreement)   Salary:          …

LEGAL AID MATTERS: SUCH A WONDERFUL LITTLE BOOK - A REVIEW OF 70 YEARS OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF LEGAL AID TO OUR SOCIETY

LEGAL AID MATTERS: SUCH A WONDERFUL LITTLE BOOK – A REVIEW OF 70 YEARS OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF LEGAL AID TO OUR SOCIETY

July 25, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Book Review, Members Content

This small, but important, book from the Justice Alliance is (I imagine) deliberately designed to resemble the campaigning pamphlets that used to be an essential part of public and political debate.  It was printed by the Legal Action Group and…

TWO SHORT TWEETS THAT SUM UP THE STATE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION IN 2019

TWO SHORT TWEETS THAT SUM UP THE STATE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION IN 2019

July 10, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In the civil courts we don’t have someone like the Secret Barrister who exposes, carefully, clearly and meticulously,  the shortcomings in the justice system. However two tweets from yesterday seem to me to exemplify the current state of court administration….

THE ROLE OF THE SOLICITOR IN PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION: IDEAS TAKEN FROM THE SECRET BARRISTER

July 9, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Advocacy, Members Content, Personal Injury

There was a tweet yesterday from someone (a non-lawyer) asserting that personal injury lawyers did not need to know the law.  His purpose, I suspect, was to lead on to an argument that the work could be done by someone…

SIXTH ANNIVERSARY OF CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF (AS A BLOG): A REVIEW OF ADVICE RECEIVED FROM ACROSS THE PROFESSION AND ACROSS THE WORLD

SIXTH ANNIVERSARY OF CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF (AS A BLOG): A REVIEW OF ADVICE RECEIVED FROM ACROSS THE PROFESSION AND ACROSS THE WORLD

June 24, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Fork handles, Members Content, Risks of litigation, Useful links, Witness statements

Today marks the 6th anniversary of the blog.  Last year I did a detailed review of many of the series and key points over the previous years.   To celebrate this year I am concentrating on the contributions made by others….

CASES TAKEN OUT OF THE LIST AT THE LAST MINUTE BECAUSE OF "LACK OF JUDICIAL TIME": WHAT ARE THE CAUSES? YOU BE THE JUDGE

CASES TAKEN OUT OF THE LIST AT THE LAST MINUTE BECAUSE OF “LACK OF JUDICIAL TIME”: WHAT ARE THE CAUSES? YOU BE THE JUDGE

June 19, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Adjournments, Members Content

Not for the first time I return to the matter of hearings being taken out of the list at the very last moment. This is a longstanding problem that is getting worse. There were reports last week of two sets…

APPLICATION TO COMMIT REFUSED BECAUSE THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT IN BREACH OF THE ORDER: WORDS ARE IMPORTANT: THE NEED FOR REPRESENTATION IN COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS

APPLICATION TO COMMIT REFUSED BECAUSE THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT IN BREACH OF THE ORDER: WORDS ARE IMPORTANT: THE NEED FOR REPRESENTATION IN COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS

June 17, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Committal proceedings, Members Content

A constant, worrying, theme on this blog has been the need for (and funding of) representation of defendants in civil committal proceedings.  These concerns run alongside the many and manifest procedural errors that applicants (and sometimes judges) make when committal…

ATTEMPTING TO OBTAIN EXTENSIONS OF TIME BY INFORMAL EMAIL : THE COURT TAKES A "SINGULARLY DIM VIEW" OF ATTEMPTS BY PARTIES TO CIRCUMVENT THE RULES (OH, AND BUNDLES AGAIN)

ATTEMPTING TO OBTAIN EXTENSIONS OF TIME BY INFORMAL EMAIL : THE COURT TAKES A “SINGULARLY DIM VIEW” OF ATTEMPTS BY PARTIES TO CIRCUMVENT THE RULES (OH, AND BUNDLES AGAIN)

June 10, 2019 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Access to justice, Appeals, Applications, Bundles, Case Management, Conduct, Extensions of time, Members Content

In Saint Benedict Land Trust Ltd v London Borough of Camden & Anor [2019] EWHC 1433 (Ch) (17 May 2019) Mr Justice Marcus Smith took a very dim view indeed of an attempt by a litigant to obtain an extension…

MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU IS LIABLE TO COVER VEHICLE BEING DRIVEN OFF ROAD: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU IS LIABLE TO COVER VEHICLE BEING DRIVEN OFF ROAD: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

June 5, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Personal Injury

NB THE PRACTICAL EFFECT OF THIS DECISION WAS OVERTURNED BY THE THE MOTOR INSURERS (COMPULSORY INSURANCE) ACT 2022 In Motor Insurers’ Bureau v Lewis [2019] EWCA Civ 909 the Court of Appeal upheld the finding of Mr Justice Soole that…

"VERY UNFORTUNATELY, ON TWO OCCASIONS... THE ... JUDGE FELL ASLEEP": APPEAL ALLOWED

“VERY UNFORTUNATELY, ON TWO OCCASIONS… THE … JUDGE FELL ASLEEP”: APPEAL ALLOWED

May 31, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Appeals, Members Content

In Science Museum Group v Wess [2019] UKEAT 0260 HHJ Auberach made a finding that the Employment Judge had fallen asleep. The appeal was allowed on this ground alone. “I find as a fact that, very unfortunately, on the afternoon…

"THIS WAS A DECISION TAKEN ON FACTS UNSUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE":  MASSIVE INCOMPETENCE BY THE PAROLE BOARD: WHERE TWO CASES GET CONFUSED - HOW CAN WE SLEEP AT NIGHT?

“THIS WAS A DECISION TAKEN ON FACTS UNSUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE”: MASSIVE INCOMPETENCE BY THE PAROLE BOARD: WHERE TWO CASES GET CONFUSED – HOW CAN WE SLEEP AT NIGHT?

May 29, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content

It is unusual for this blog to look at decisions relating to Parole Board. However the careful gathering and analysis of evidence is central to every litigator’s role.  A remarkable set of facts is outlined in the judgment of  HHJ…

HOUSING AND LEGAL WORK IN NON-PROFIT VOLUNTARY ORGANISATIONS: ADVERTISE YOUR JOBS HERE

HOUSING AND LEGAL WORK IN NON-PROFIT VOLUNTARY ORGANISATIONS: ADVERTISE YOUR JOBS HERE

May 27, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

One of the doyennes of legal bloggers, Giles Peaker, has taken a short break. This leaves at least two gaps in the provision of the valuable services he gives the legal community. HOUSING AND VOLUNTARY SECTION LAWYERS – PLACE YOUR…

"THE COURT REFORM PROGRAMME IS MARKED BY RECKLESSNESS AND LACK OF FORESIGHT": VIEWS FROM THE FRONT LINE: MORE RESPONSES TO THE JUSTICE COMMITTEE

“THE COURT REFORM PROGRAMME IS MARKED BY RECKLESSNESS AND LACK OF FORESIGHT”: VIEWS FROM THE FRONT LINE: MORE RESPONSES TO THE JUSTICE COMMITTEE

May 21, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

The responses to the Justice Committee review are a virtual gold mine of information for anyone interested in civil procedure and the practical impact of court reforms. The reforms have not meant improvements, far from it. This can be seen…

CLOSING COURTS: MORE MADNESS AND MAYHEM FROM HMCTS: CLOSING MORE COURTS & NO PROPER RESEARCH (BUT THEY'VE PAID £30 MILLION TO "CONSULTANTS" SO EVERYTHING WILL BE FINE

CLOSING COURTS: MORE MADNESS AND MAYHEM FROM HMCTS: CLOSING MORE COURTS & NO PROPER RESEARCH (BUT THEY’VE PAID £30 MILLION TO “CONSULTANTS” SO EVERYTHING WILL BE FINE

May 19, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

Anyone concerned with access to justice knows that this includes physical access. There have to be courts for people to go to.I want to encourage everyone to read and to respond to the HMCTS document “Fit for the future: transforming…

THE BALLAD OF READING COUNTY COURT LIFT: IN POETRY

THE BALLAD OF READING COUNTY COURT LIFT: IN POETRY

May 12, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

Barrister Rawdon Crozier has put the plight of Reading County Court life into a poem. It speaks for itself, as all good poetry should.   The Ballad of Reading County Court Lift I never saw a lift which looked With…

THE BALLAD OF READING COUNTY COURT LIFT: THIS IS A TRAGEDY NOT A COMEDY

THE BALLAD OF READING COUNTY COURT LIFT: THIS IS A TRAGEDY NOT A COMEDY

May 12, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

The earlier post about the Twitter account of  broken lift in Reading County Court has already led to a lot of responses.  This is a battle being fought with humour, however its consequences are serious, profoundly serious.  Many people have…

THE BALLAD OF READING COUNTY COURT LIFT:  THE LIFT WITH ITS OWN TWITTER ACCOUNT - AN ESCALATING PROBLEM

THE BALLAD OF READING COUNTY COURT LIFT: THE LIFT WITH ITS OWN TWITTER ACCOUNT – AN ESCALATING PROBLEM

May 12, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content, Useful links

Last week I went to Reading County Court.  This was a new court to me and I asked the Legal Twitterati for directions (“out of the station turn left at Snappy Snaps”, for anyone who needs to know). What was…

REVIEW OF BLOCK LISTING: HELP PIBA WITH INFORMATION ON ITS "EFFECTIVENESS" (AND THE PROBLEMS CAUSED TO THOSE WHO ARE NOT REACHED)

REVIEW OF BLOCK LISTING: HELP PIBA WITH INFORMATION ON ITS “EFFECTIVENESS” (AND THE PROBLEMS CAUSED TO THOSE WHO ARE NOT REACHED)

April 22, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Members Content

Every so often the MOJ has periods of “block listing” events at the Royal Court of Justice.  Essentially many Fast Track cases are listed and many dozens of litigants turn up in the hope of having their cases heard.  This…

ARGUMENT THAT DEFENDANT NOT LIABLE TO PAY COURT FEES SENT TO COVENTRY

ARGUMENT THAT DEFENDANT NOT LIABLE TO PAY COURT FEES SENT TO COVENTRY

April 12, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Costs, Court fees, Members Content

I am grateful to Michael Fletcher from Glaisyers Solicitors LLP for sending me a copy of a note of a judgment from Coventy County Court yesterday in  Cook -v- Malcolm Nicholls Limited.  It is a case concerning whether the claimant…

SOCIAL MEDIA AS A SOCIAL GOOD:WE'RE LOOKING FOR ADVICE FOR LAWYERS WHEN THE SKY FALLS IN

SOCIAL MEDIA AS A SOCIAL GOOD:WE’RE LOOKING FOR ADVICE FOR LAWYERS WHEN THE SKY FALLS IN

March 31, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Conduct, Members Content

Two posts last weeks dealt with the hundreds of replies I got when I asked  on Twitter what advice should be given to smooth the path  young or aspirant lawyers.  This led to wider coverage than I could have imagined…

"BE KIND TO PEOPLE": THE (ALMOST) COMPLETE GUIDE FOR ASPIRANT AND NEW LAWYERS FROM TWITTER

“BE KIND TO PEOPLE”: THE (ALMOST) COMPLETE GUIDE FOR ASPIRANT AND NEW LAWYERS FROM TWITTER

March 27, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Advocacy, Members Content, Well being, What I'd tell a younger me, Witness statements

Yesterday I set out some of the Advice given on Twitter to those making a start in the legal profession. Here I have most of the posts. The discussion is still going on.  There has been a particularly long chain…

"THE STATE HAS SIMPLY WASHED ITS HANDS OF THE PROBLEM, LEAVING THE SOLUTION... TO THE GOODWILL, AND CHARITY, OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION"

“THE STATE HAS SIMPLY WASHED ITS HANDS OF THE PROBLEM, LEAVING THE SOLUTION… TO THE GOODWILL, AND CHARITY, OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION”

March 22, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

Every sensible citizen should read the judgment of Sir James Munby in M v P [2019] EWFC 14.   It is a classic case of the government creating a problem and leaving the victims unsupported (whilst it employs a formidable legal team…

TIMING OF APPLICATIONS FOR ANONYMITY: CLAIMANTS SHOULD ACT WELL BEFORE TRIAL

TIMING OF APPLICATIONS FOR ANONYMITY: CLAIMANTS SHOULD ACT WELL BEFORE TRIAL

March 10, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In  Zeromska-Smith v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2019] EWHC 552 (QB) Mr Justice Martin Spencer refused the claimant’s application for anonymity.  He made important observations about when such an application should normally be made. THE TIMING OF APPLICATIONS After refusing…

CLAIMANTS IN A FATAL ACCIDENT CLAIM HAVE NOT "WON" ANYTHING: SETTLEMENT OF ACTION APPROVED: DETAILS KEPT CONFIDENTIAL

CLAIMANTS IN A FATAL ACCIDENT CLAIM HAVE NOT “WON” ANYTHING: SETTLEMENT OF ACTION APPROVED: DETAILS KEPT CONFIDENTIAL

February 8, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Damages, Fatal Accidents, Members Content

In Correa & Ors v BP Plc & Ors [2019] EWHC 232 (QB) Mrs Justice Yip approved damages in a fatal accident case.  The judgment provides a great deal of anonymity but gives a real indication of the difficulties involved. “The…

ANOTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT OVERTURNED: BREACHES OF REQUIREMENT FOR A FAIR HEARING MEANT ORDER MUST BE QUASHED

ANOTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT OVERTURNED: BREACHES OF REQUIREMENT FOR A FAIR HEARING MEANT ORDER MUST BE QUASHED

January 30, 2019 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Access to justice, Committal proceedings, Litigants in person, Members Content

I am starting to lose count of the number of times the Court of Appeal has overturned decisions committing people to prison because of very basic and fundamental failures of procedure.  It is as though all the strictures against fair…

WHEN THE COURT LETS YOU DOWN: A WORRYING CHRONOLOGY

WHEN THE COURT LETS YOU DOWN: A WORRYING CHRONOLOGY

January 28, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

In  BC v BG [2019] EWFC 7  the court rejected an application to set aside an arbitration award made in ancillary relief proceedings. The application was unsuccessful (and the applicant awarded to pay costs). However the issue of concern is the…

THE LANGUAGE OF LAW: A JUDGMENT THAT IS WRITTEN FOR THE BENEFIT OF A CHILD

THE LANGUAGE OF LAW: A JUDGMENT THAT IS WRITTEN FOR THE BENEFIT OF A CHILD

January 24, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

A short tweet I did yesterday has caused dozens of comments. It is not about a civil case but a family case. However it is a matter of universal interest, the language of law.  In this case the judgment had…

TRANSPARENCY PROJECT: TRAINING FOR LAWYERS: 29th JANUARY 2019

TRANSPARENCY PROJECT: TRAINING FOR LAWYERS: 29th JANUARY 2019

January 23, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Courses, Members Content, Useful links

The Transparency Project is running a training course for lawyers on the 29th January 2019 at Gresham College, Holborn, London. Attendance is free of charge, although those who attend are invited to make a donation to further the work of…

"CIVIL JUSTICE IS A PUBLIC GOOD": SPEECH BY LORD JUSTICE GROSS: WHY WE ARE WORKING IN THE "CINDERELLA" SECTOR

“CIVIL JUSTICE IS A PUBLIC GOOD”: SPEECH BY LORD JUSTICE GROSS: WHY WE ARE WORKING IN THE “CINDERELLA” SECTOR

January 17, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content, Useful links

This morning I am encouraging you all to read the speech of Lord Justice Gross given to the London Common Law & Commercial Bar Association Annual Lecture. It is a wide-ranging speech, the essential theme is that Civil Justice is…

LITIGANTS IN PERSON AND THE USE OF COURT TIME: AN EXAMPLE OF THINGS TO COME?

LITIGANTS IN PERSON AND THE USE OF COURT TIME: AN EXAMPLE OF THINGS TO COME?

January 10, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Appeals, Applications, Litigants in person, Members Content

The case of  Zaman v Portsmouth City Council [2018] EWHC 3592 (QB) makes interesting reading for anyone concerned about the effect that the increasing number of litigants in person could have on the court system. THE CASE The claimant sought payment…

ARROGANT, RUDE, SEXIST (AND AT TIMES BARELY LITERATE): THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE: WE ALL DESERVE BETTER MUCH, MUCH BETTER

January 6, 2019 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Access to justice, Members Content

My “litigator’s New Year’s resolution” for 2019 was to recommend that everyone read more of Emily Dugan’s work on exposing the impact of the cuts at the Ministry of Justice. When I wrote the “resolution” I could not have conceived…

A NEW YEAR’S RESOLUTION FOR LITIGATORS: READ BUZZFEED MORE OFTEN: FIND OUT WHAT JUDGES REALLY THINK AND THE MOJ’S HIGHLY “SELECTIVE” USE OF STATISTICS

January 1, 2019 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content

I have written before about the impressive work done by the journalist Emily Duggan on Buzzfeed News. Emily is one of the people who keeps a close, and sceptical, eye on what we are being told about reforms to the …

BAD WEATHER MEANT COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED AN ADJOURNMENT: THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED

BAD WEATHER MEANT COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED AN ADJOURNMENT: THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED

December 28, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Adjournments, Applications, Members Content

In Pari-Jones v CPS [2018] EWHC 3482 (Admin) the Administrative Court allowed an appeal against a decision not to adjourn a trial.  The magistrates’ court simply went ahead without referring to any of the relevant legal principles.   Although these were criminal…

CIVIL EVIDENCE AND LITIGANTS IN PERSON : THE DANGERS OF A JUDGE ASKING  LEADING QUESTIONS

CIVIL EVIDENCE AND LITIGANTS IN PERSON : THE DANGERS OF A JUDGE ASKING LEADING QUESTIONS

November 27, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Appeals, Civil evidence, Litigants in person, Members Content

In Global Corporate Ltd v Hale [2018] EWCA Civ 2618 the Court of Appeal emphasised the dangers of a judge asking  leading questions of a witness. It is a case that highlights the difficulties of trials involving litigants in person. THE…

THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE'S REPORT 2018: SELECTED EXTRACTS

THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE’S REPORT 2018: SELECTED EXTRACTS

November 14, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The Lord Chief Justice’s Report for 2018 is available if you follow the link here. Much of it is important.  I have selected extracts that may be of particular interest to litigators.  (There is an argument that some key indicators that…

LITIGATION IS A TOUGH WORLD: IF YOU MAKE MISTAKES:  GET HELP - PLEASE

LITIGATION IS A TOUGH WORLD: IF YOU MAKE MISTAKES: GET HELP – PLEASE

November 13, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Members Content

The decision of the Administrative Court in Solicitors Regulation Authority v James [2018] EWHC 3058 (Admin) has already received wide publication.  The Court overturned a decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal not to strike off solicitors who had been dishonest.  It…

LIVE COURT OF APPEAL STREAMING - GIVES YOU A GRANDSTAND SEAT

LIVE COURT OF APPEAL STREAMING – GIVES YOU A GRANDSTAND SEAT

November 13, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Advocacy, Appeals, Members Content

The Court of Appeal pilot scheme for live streaming will start on Thursday, details are available on the Court and Tribunals Judiciary website. THE FIRST MATCH… The first case to be heard  with live streaming concerns West Ham United football…

SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT COSTS: AN AGREEMENT TO PAY A SPECIFIC SUM FOR PAST COSTS NOT UNFAIR AND NOT SET ASIDE

SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT COSTS: AN AGREEMENT TO PAY A SPECIFIC SUM FOR PAST COSTS NOT UNFAIR AND NOT SET ASIDE

November 12, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Costs, Members Content

The judgment of Master Brown in Whitaker v Richard Slade & Company Plc [2018] EWHC B17 (Costs) may have some interesting implications for solicitor and own-client costs.  In particular the finding that an agreement in relation a specific sum for work…

THE JUSTICE PAPERS FOR JUSTICE WEEK:  ESSENTIAL READING: VIEWS FROM THE SHARP END

THE JUSTICE PAPERS FOR JUSTICE WEEK: ESSENTIAL READING: VIEWS FROM THE SHARP END

November 5, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content, Useful links

The Bar Council has circulated  links to a number of papers written in support of Justice Week : “a series of personal accounts giving first-hand insight into the crises occurring across the system.”  Every one of these deserves the widest publicity…

COURT CLOSURES: THE HUMAN COSTS: WATCH THE MOVIE

COURT CLOSURES: THE HUMAN COSTS: WATCH THE MOVIE

October 31, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Members Content, Useful links

Suffolk Law Centre has produced a short video, available on Youtube, to highlight the human impact of court closures. THE VIDEO The video shows the human cost (and the actual cost) of travelling to court centres that are now a…

THE MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU IS AN EMANATION OF THE STATE: IT IS LIABLE TO INDEMNIFY CLAIMANT INJURED BY AN "OFF ROAD" VEHICLE

THE MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU IS AN EMANATION OF THE STATE: IT IS LIABLE TO INDEMNIFY CLAIMANT INJURED BY AN “OFF ROAD” VEHICLE

September 20, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Judgment, Members Content

I am grateful to  David Gauler of Thompsons, solicitors,  for sending me a copy of the judgment of Mr Justice Soole in Lewis -v- Tinsdale & the Motor Insurers Bureau [2018] EWHC 2376 (QB), a copy of which is available…

"EFFICIENCY" AND THE COURT SYSTEM 3: WANT TO BE A LAWYER? BUY YOURSELF A SELFIE STICK

“EFFICIENCY” AND THE COURT SYSTEM 3: WANT TO BE A LAWYER? BUY YOURSELF A SELFIE STICK

September 18, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Bundles, Civil evidence, Members Content

In the third (and I suspect not the last) I want to set out a series of tweets which arose from the earlier posts on this topic. There were a series of tweets about the problems caused by courts losing…

"EFFICIENCY" AND THE COURT SYSTEM 2: A COMEDY OF ERRORS - YOU BE THE JUDGE

“EFFICIENCY” AND THE COURT SYSTEM 2: A COMEDY OF ERRORS – YOU BE THE JUDGE

September 17, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Bundles, Case Management, Members Content

Yesterday I did a short post on court errors. I have been given permission to post another one. Again I will let the facts speak for themselves.  A series of tweets from Mairead‏ @m417ead 10 repeated with their permission.  A SAD SAGA Trial 1…

COSTS IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION: “ARROGANCE” AND “PETULANCE” LEADS TO AN AWARD OF COSTS AGAINST A LOCAL AUTHORITY

September 3, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Admissions, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

In London Borough of Lambeth v MCS & Anor [2018] EWCOP 20 Mr Justice Newton did not follow the normal practice in Court of Protection cases. He ordered costs to be paid against the Local Authority and the Lambeth Commissioning Group….

SORRY SEEMS TO BE THE HARDEST WORD: PURGING CONTEMPT OF COURT

SORRY SEEMS TO BE THE HARDEST WORD: PURGING CONTEMPT OF COURT

August 28, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Members Content

There is a section in the Court of Appeal judgment in James v James [2018] EWCA Civ 1982  that is of some importance. It relates to the question of whether a party should appeal an order for contempt or apply to…

THE CORRECT FEE ON A PART 8 APPLICATION: DON'T LET THE COURT STAFF MAKE YOU HAND OVER MONEY FOR NOTHING

THE CORRECT FEE ON A PART 8 APPLICATION: DON’T LET THE COURT STAFF MAKE YOU HAND OVER MONEY FOR NOTHING

August 28, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Costs, Court fees, Members Content

A Twitter conversation this morning came up with the old chestnut of court staff informing a solicitor that the court fee to be paid on a Part 8 application for approval was identical to that on a Part 7 claim. …

PROVING THINGS 118: IT SEEMS THAT EVEN THE LORD CHANCELLOR DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO PROVE THINGS: "THAT FINAL SENTENCE WAS BOTH INACCURATE AND MISLEADING"

PROVING THINGS 118: IT SEEMS THAT EVEN THE LORD CHANCELLOR DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO PROVE THINGS: “THAT FINAL SENTENCE WAS BOTH INACCURATE AND MISLEADING”

July 9, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content

A body charged with the delivery of legal services to some of the most vulnerable people in our society (and which, incidentally, is in charge of the justice system) should  be making decisions that are logical and justifiable – you…

FIFTH BIRTHDAY REVIEW 6: PROPORTIONALITY: THE POSTS AND 12 PRACTICAL STEPS

FIFTH BIRTHDAY REVIEW 6: PROPORTIONALITY: THE POSTS AND 12 PRACTICAL STEPS

June 25, 2018 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Applications, Costs, Members Content, Proportionality

The series “Proportionality & Survival for Litigators” started in December 2014.  At the outset I said it could be a long-running and difficult series – it is definitely still ongoing. It remains the case that little written is on proportionality, …

← Previous 1 2 3 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 35.2K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • MAZUR RECORDING – NOW AVAILABLE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON’T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT…
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE “CONDUCT OF LITIGATION”? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS
  • PART 36: SHOULD THE COURT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION SO THAT THE NORMAL PART 36 PROVISIONS DO NOT APPLY? THE HIGH COURT CONSIDERS THE “FORMIDABLE OBSTACLE”…

Top Posts

  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON'T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT...
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION"? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS
  • MAZUR MATTERS 8: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION" (1): HOW HELPFUL ARE THE REGULATORS?
  • MAZUR RECORDING - NOW AVAILABLE
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2023
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.