ANOTHER CASE WHERE A WITNESS STATEMENT WAS SERVED BUT THE WITNESS DID NOT ATTEND TRIAL: THE DEFENDANT HAD USED PARTS OF THE STATEMENT IN CROSS EXAMINATION – WHAT WAS ITS STATUS?
We are looking at another case where a party served a witness statement and yet the witness did not attend trial, the court only being told of this at the end of the trial itself. In this case the statement…
DISCOUNTS FOR MEMBERS ON THE CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF SERIES OF WEBINARS: THE CODE
As promised in the previous post, here is the discount code for the Civil Litigation Brief series of webinars. The webinars include topics such as cost effective delegation, attendance notes, the liability of insurers to pay judgments, the joint expert…
MEMBER NEWS: DISCOUNTS FOR MEMBERS ON THE CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF SERIES OF WEBINARS
There are a series of webinars coming up which cover many of the key aspects we look at on this site. Members who subscribe to the site can now obtain a discount on each of the webinars, with further discounts…
EXPERT WATCH 11: EXPERT ASSERTS THAT THE CLAIMANT WAS MALINGERING BUT WOULDN’T TELL THE COURT ABOUT THE DETAILS OF THE TESTS THAT LED TO THAT CONCLUSION
We have seen some unusual conduct of experts on this site. However the case we look at today has elements that we have not looked at before. An expert carried out tests on the claimant and, as a result of…
MY WITNESSES HAVE MADE STATEMENTS BUT WILL NOT ATTEND THE TRIAL: WHAT IS THE JUDGE GOING TO INFER? SECTION 2(4) OF THE CIVIL EVIDENCE ACT 1995 CONSIDERED
Here we are looking at a case where the claimant served witness statements that he said he was going to rely on. It only became apparent part way through the trial that the claimant was not, in fact, going to…
WHEN HAS A PARTY CONSENTED TO SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS BY EMAIL? IS A FAILURE TO OBTAIN SPECIFIC CONSENT IN ADVANCE FATAL TO VALID SERVICE?
We are carrying on with the review of the appeal judgment that considered key issues in relation to service by electronic means. Here the judge considered whether the claimant’s failure to obtain the defendant’s specific consent prior to service rendered…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED AFTER CLAIMANTS BREACHED PEREMPTORY ORDER: RETIRED FOOTBALLERS ALLOWED TO STAY ON THE FIELD…
We are looking today at a case with an unusual, if not extraordinary, procedural history. The Master observed that the claimants had been very poorly represented in the past: “It is abundantly clear from the succession of retainers and instructions…
PROVING THINGS 268: LAW FIRM DEFENDANT FAILS TO ADDUCE EVIDENCE TO PROVE ITS ASSERTIONS – IT WAS BOUND BY ITS OWN “BAD BARGAIN”
Here we have an interesting dispute between two firms of lawyers. The claimant sued the defendant under a contractual agreement following the transfer of files. What is particularly interesting here is the judge’s observations on the lack of evidence brought…
ALLOCATION TO THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK OR FAST TRACK IN HOUSING CASES 3: WEBINAR 10th SEPTEMBER 2025
Earlier today we have looked at two appeals in relation to allocation in housing disrepairs. Each appeal was successful for different reasons. My involvement in one of the appeals has led me, along with Steve Cornforth, a webinar on Allocation…
CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 105: AN ADVOCATE SHOULD NOT GIVE EVIDENCE (NOR TRY TO SLIP IT INTO A SKELETON ARGUMENT)
This post follows the comments of the judge in a case we looked at last week that “counsel cannot give evidence”. We have seen many examples on this site of judicial criticism that witness evidence is, in fact, commentary, submissions…
KEY ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED WHEN A PARTY WANTS AN INJUNCTION: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS JUDGE’S DECISION NOT TO DELIVER…
This is a Court of Appeal decision that anyone applying for, or resisting, an application for an injunction would benefit from reading. It deals with some of the key issues in relation to injunctions. There was a “serious issue to…
COST BITES 272: CLAIMANTS ORDERED TO PAY SOME OF A DEFENDANT’S COSTS IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO JUDGMENT BECAUSE OF THE WAY IN WHICH THE TRIAL WAS CONDUCTED
Last week we had a judge discussing the “pay as you go” principle in litigation. Here we have a slight extension of that principle with the judge deciding that the claimants’ conduct of the the trial meant that they should…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 29: THE DUTIES INVOLVED WHEN PLEADING FRAUD: CLAIMANT’S ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE “MORE CONSISTENT WITH HONESTY” ON THE PART OF THE DEFENDANT
Here we are looking at a case where the claimant applied for permission to amend its Particulars so it could plead fraud. The application was refused. It is a reminder of the onerous duties on a party when proposing to…
MEMBER NEWS: INCREASING NUMBERS FOR CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP: INCREASED FLEXIBILITY: ALSO LOOKING AT THE BACK CATALOGUE: “AVOIDING PROCEDURAL DEATH”: POSTS ABOUT THE CLAIM FORM ON THIS SITE
I have had a number of enquiries recently about increasing member numbers for corporate groups. This is possible, the membership system allows this and you can upgrade with the previous payment being taken into account on a pro rata…
AVOIDING NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS IN LITIGATION 2025 (1): LIMITATION IN PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS – HOW DOES ANYONE MISS A THREE YEAR LIMITATION PERIOD?
In an ideal world all personal injury limitation periods would be three years, and all other action six. However we do not live in an ideal world. The first, and most obvious, place to look at avoiding negligence claims is…
PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 10: WAS THIS CLAIM STATUTE BARRED?IF SO SHOULD THE COURT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION UNDER SECTION 33 OF THE LIMITATION ACT 1980?
Here we look at a decision in relation to limitation. The trial judge had to determine whether the claimant’s action was statute barred. If it was she then had to consider whether it was appropriate to exercise the court’s discretion…
EXPERT WATCH 10: CLAIMANT UNSUCCESSFUL ON APPEAL IN ATTEMPTING TO OVERTURN THE TRIAL JUDGE’S PREFERENCE FOR THE DEFENDANT’S EXPERTS: “THE IRREDUCIBLE FACT IS IS THAT THE JUDGE ACCEPTED THE EXPERT EVIDENCE OF THE RESPONDENT’S KEY WITNESS AND PREFERRED TO OVER THE EVIDENCE OF THE APPELLANT’S KEY EXPERT WITNESS”
There are relatively few cases where a party appeals on the basis that trial judge was wrong to accept the evidence of one party’s expert witness in preference to the other. There are even fewer cases where such an appeal…
CHANGES TO PRACTICE DIRECTION ON THE DAMAGES CLAIMS PILOT: PUBLISHED LAST TUESDAY – COMING INTO FORCE AT 11.00 TOMORROW: SOME POINTS ON ISSUE AND LIMITATION
There are changes coming into force at 11.00 tomorrow. There are changes to PD 51R and PD51ZB. (Set your alarm clocks early tomorrow – these changes come into force – at 11.00 am…) THE CHANGES TO TO THE PRACTICE DIRECTION:…
ABSENT WITNESSES AND ADVERSE INFERENCES (AGAIN): WE DON’T WANT TO PAY YOU THE US$1,911,877,385 YOU ARE CLAIMING: BUT WE WON’T GIVE EVIDENCE
We are continuing with looking at the consequences of a party failing to call witnesses, or, as in this case, give no evidence of fact at all. In this case the judge had no difficulty in stating his views as…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CORNER 3: ABSENT DOCTORS AND ADVERSE INFERENCES (SOMETHING TO CONSIDER FOR ALL LITIGATORS HERE…)
Today we are looking at a case where the judge considered whether adverse inferences should be drawn when a relevant expert was not called to give evidence at trial. This issue of what matters the court can properly conclude when…
ANOTHER BREACH OF EMBARGO CASE: THE MISTAKE AS TO WHAT WAS MEANT BY “PARTIES” AND HOW PROMPT STEPS MITIGATED THE BREACH
Cases about breaches of embargos on draft judgments keep appearing with surprising frequency. We have another one here. The judgment emphasises the nature of the advice the lawyer must give to the client. Not only must be draft judgment not…
APPLICANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY UPON A WITNESS STATEMENT THAT WAS SERVED LATE: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES IS EFFECTIVELY A FORM OF CHEATING
Here we are looking at a case from the family jurisdiction. Slightly different rules apply, however the overall principles are the same as in the CPR. The judge had to consider whether to grant permission to an applicant to rely…
A FINAL TRIBUTE TO DISTRICT JUDGE GEORGE BRANCHFLOWER: A JUDGMENT WHICH GOT A MENTION AT HIS FUNERAL TODAY
Today I attended the funeral of District Judge George Branchflower. I have written briefly about him before. At his funeral we heard tributes from those who knew him best including a touching tribute from his daughter and a wonderful song…
EXPERT WATCH 9: FAILURES TO COMPLY WITH THE PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL AND TO INFORM THE EXPERTS OF THE DEFENDANT’S CASE COULD RENDER THE EVIDENCE “USELESS”: AN EXPENSIVE DAY OUT FOR THE CLAIMANTS’ SOLICITORS…
Here we look at a decision not about the conduct of experts but the way in which the experts were instructed and failure to comply with pre-action protocols. On the face of it this is a decision of major importance…
MEMBER NEWS: HONING IN ON THE INTERNAL RESEARCH FACILITY ON THIS SITE: WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION – SOME GUIDANCE
Yesterday I had an enquiry about the internal search function on this site. In particular whether it used Boolean operators. It doesn’t but there is a “work around” discussed below. On a separate issue I also recorded a webinar on…
HOW NOT TO APPLY TO SET ASIDE A JUDGMENT WHICH IS ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN OBTAINED BY FRAUD: THE JUDGE MARKED THE “ILL CONSIDERED AND POOR MANNER IN WHICH THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PREPARED AND PROSECUTED”
It is possible to apply to set aside a previous judgment when the applicant’s case is that that judgment was obtained by fraud. However here we look at an almost textbook example of how not to go about this. The court…
EXPERT WATCH 8: “SCIENCE DOES NOT CHANGE” : EVIDENCE THAT WAS “UNIMPRESSIVE IN PARTS AND OF LITTLE ASSISTANCE TO THE COURT”
To end the week I am looking at another decision about expert witnesses (it has been a theme this week). This time we are looking at accident reconstruction experts. One expert was found wanting, the judge favoured the other. The…
EXPERT WATCH 7: “THIS CASE IS NOT SHORT OF ADVOCATES”: AN EXPERT REPORTING FOR THE CLAIMANT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ONE OF THEM: FURTHER THEY SHOULD HAVE DISCLOSED THAT THEY HAD “COPIED” THEIR REPORT
Yesterday I imposed a 24 hour respite on this series “unless something really interesting comes up”. I have broken that promise, it lasted 22 hours. However the cases on experts keep coming in and, I think, readers need to know…
EXPERT WATCH 6: THE DEFENDANT’S EXPERT IS FAR BETTER QUALIFIED THAN THE CLAIMANT’S EXPERT: AN EXPERT WHO, IN PART, WAS ACTING AS AN ADVOCATE FOR THE CLAIMANT
I feel almost bound to apologise for adding another post to this series today. I am not going looking for cases on experts – they just keep coming up. Here we have a judgment given today in a clinical negligence…
EXPERT WATCH 5: AN EXPERT SHOULD DISCLOSE PREVIOUS CRITICISMS MADE BY JUDGES: PARTICULARLY WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN WARNED ABOUT THIS BEFORE…
We have seen a trend in a number of recent cases of advocates cross examining experts and referring to judicial criticism made in previous cases that experts have been involved in. The judgment here goes one further and indicates that…
EXPERT WATCH 4: THE EXPERT SHOULD INFORM THE COURT IF MEMBERSHIP OF A PROFESSIONAL ORGANISATION HAD CEASED, PARTICULARLY IF THIS IS LINKED TO DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THEM
We are returning (and not for the last time) to a recent decision where the court considered the expert evidence in detail. Here we look at the judgment in relation to an expert who failed, until prompted, to inform the…
EXPERT WATCH 3: EVIDENCE FROM EXPERTS ON FOREIGN LAW: SOME OF THE EXPERTS FOUND WANTING
Here we are looking at a judge’s assessment of witnesses who gave evidence as to foreign law. Some of the witnesses were found to be less then helpful. (This case appears to have taken up several months of court time….
WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION 2025: WEBINAR 4th AUGUST 2025
This webinar looks at what to do when things go wrong in civil litigation. There is a continual flow of reports that deal with errors made in relation to limitation, service or someone falling foul of the rules or court…
COST BITES 262: THE CLAIMANTS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ORDERED TO PAY COSTS IN A “MIXED” CLAIM AGAINST THE POLICE
Here we are looking at issues relating to costs in an action that included a claim for personal injury but also included other elements. The question the appellate judge had to decide was whether the trial judge had applied the…
NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 12TH SEPTEMBER 2025 AND THE 1ST OCTOBER 2025 (1): COSTS
Here we look at the latest statutory instrument which makes changes to the rules. We are starting by looking at the changes in relation to the rules relating to costs. These provisions come into force on the 1st October 2025….
EXPERT WATCH 2: THE EXPERT WHO REPORTED WITHOUT ALL THE RELEVANT EVIDENCE TO HAND AND THEN WOULD NOT RECOGNISE HE HAD MADE A MISTAKE
Here we look at a case where an expert reported without having all the relevant evidence to hand. In fact he only saw the claimant’s witness statements a few days before the trial. This, added to other issues, led to…
EXPERT WATCH 1: THE DUTY TO STATE THE SOURCES OF THE EXPERT’S INFORMATION
This is the start of a series examining cases where expert evidence is considered by the courts. As matters stand there are already dozens of posts on this site where the conduct of experts has been considered (and often criticised)…
“INADEQUATE REASONS” IN CIVIL JUDGMENTS: THE COURT OF APPEAL PROVIDES A PRIMER FOR JUDGES (AND SOME IMPORTANT POINTS FOR THE REST OF US)
Here we look at a Court of Appeal decision last week on inadequate reasons given in judgments. This has major practical implications for judges and practitioners. Appeals because of “inadequate” reasoning are those that are the most unfair to all…
PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS 4: WHO SHOULD PAY THE COSTS WHEN THE CLAIMANT INITIALLY SUED THE WRONG DEFENDANT BUT THE ACTION WAS NOT STRUCK OUT?
Litigators and litigants are always particularly interested in knowing what the costs consequences of a hearing was. We get an opportunity to consider this here, looking at the costs order of a judgment we have already considered. What should the…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CORNER 2: OVER TWO WEEKS IN COURT, A PANOPALY OF EXPERTS – BUT THE CASE CAME DOWN TO “WHO SAID WHAT TO WHO?”
The principles relating to clinical negligence cases are well known. The major problem is usually determining the facts. In cases that involve a disputed recollection of what was said and asked in medical consultations this gives rise to major issues. …
COST BITES 260: THE “CLIENT” WAS NOT LIABLE TO PAY THE SOLICITORS BILLS : EACH ENTITY PUT IN ITS TIME AND EFFORT AT ITS OWN RISK
Today we are looking at a highly unusual solicitor and own client costs assessment. After hearing evidence over five days the judge decided that there was no retainer between the “client”and the solicitor. The client was not liable to pay…
MATTERS “NOT MENTIONED IN THE WITNESS STATEMENT”: ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OMISSIONS GIIVING RISE TO ADVERSE CONCLUSIONS
We are looking again at the significance of matters not mentioned in a witness statement. This is another case where the judge found that there had been significant omissions in the claimant’s evidence. Again it is a case where these omissions…
KEY OMISSIONS AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: A FAILURE TO MENTION KEY POINTS IN THE STATEMENT DOES NOT HELP THE WITNESS: A WORKING EXAMPLE
The theme for several of the posts today is how important it is to put information, that could be viewed as adverse to the witness, into a witness statement. If such information is left out, but revealed in cross-examination this…
WHY IS THIS SOLICITOR GIVING EVIDENCE? NOT REALLY A QUESTION YOU WANT A JUDGE TO ASK: PARTICULARLY WHEN THE ANSWER IS “I DON’T KNOW” BUT “I WAS PAID TO DO SO”
An earlier post looked at a case where the court struck out large parts of a witness statement of a solicitor who was proposing to give evidence at trial. Here we look at what happened to the remaining parts of…
A DEFENDANTS’ FIRM OF SOLICITORS COULD LAWFULLY GIVE DETAILS OF CLAIMANTS IN SIMILAR CASES WHEN DEFENDING FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY CLAIMS
Here we are looking at a case where claimants brought an action claiming that their data protection rights had been breached by a defendant firm of solicitors. The defendant had collated a list of claimants who had relied on a…
WHEN A PARTY RELIES ON “NON PART 35 COMPLIANT” EXPERT REPORTS: THIS IS HARDLY LIKELY TO CARRY MUCH WEIGHT…
The first question the lawyer must ask when being presented with a report for use in proceeding is – is this report CPR 35 compliant? If it is not then it may have little, if any value. There is a…
THE HOUSE OF COMMONS JUSTICE COMMITTEE: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE COUNTY COURT: RAT INFESTED BUILDINGS: A “DYSFUNCTIONAL SYSTEM” THAT “HAS FAILED ADEQUATELY” TO DELIVER CIVIL JUSTICE: (NO PAYWALL)
In the Civil Justice system we do not have a figure such as the Secret Barrister who can publicise the major problems that exist in the county court. The House of Commons Justice Committee have gone a long way to…
DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS: WHEN THE WITNESS HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE MATTERS THEY RELY ON: HE “SHOULD HAVE CHECKED THE UNDERLYING DOCUMENTS HIMSELF”.
There is an apparently never ending series of cases in which witness statements are used in circumstances where, in reality, the maker of that statement has no first hand knowledge of the matters stated. This often only becomes apparent at…
USING THE CONTENTS OF A WITNESS STATEMENT FOR A COLLATERAL PURPOSE: CONTEMPT OF COURT AND COSTS: A HEADY MIXTURE HERE.
We are revisiting a case we looked at previously in relation to costs orders being made against a Litigant in Person. One specific aspect of that judgment considered the costs of an application for contempt of court that the claimant…
WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION 2025: WEBINAR 4th AUGUST 2025
One of the most aggravating things to read about in the legal press are those cases where people get into serious disciplinary trouble after having made a procedural or other mistake. It is not the mistake that has caused their…
You must be logged in to post a comment.