Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Relief from sanctions » Page 9
COST BUDGET SERVED TWO MONTHS LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS ALLOWED: DELAY DOES NOT ALWAYS GIVE RISE TO A SIGNIFICANT BREACH

COST BUDGET SERVED TWO MONTHS LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS ALLOWED: DELAY DOES NOT ALWAYS GIVE RISE TO A SIGNIFICANT BREACH

October 10, 2017 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

I am grateful to my colleague Colin Richmond for sending me a copy of the decision of His Honour Judge Gosnell  In Hewitt -v- Smith (Bradford County Court 16th June 2017) relating to a successful appeal from a refusal to…

LATE SERVICE OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: DETAILS OF CLAIM DO NOT CONSTITUTE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

LATE SERVICE OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: DETAILS OF CLAIM DO NOT CONSTITUTE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

October 2, 2017 · by gexall · in Case Management, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Serving documents

In Chelsea Bridge Apartments Ltd -v- Old Street Homes Ltd (Deputy Master Cousins, 4th September 2017*) Deputy Master Cousins refused the claimants’ application for relief from sanctions in failing to serve Particulars of claim on time. “I find that the…

COST BUDGETING: THE CASES AND POSTS IN ONE PLACE

COST BUDGETING: THE CASES AND POSTS IN ONE PLACE

September 29, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a specific section on relief from sanctions on this blog which links to all the posts and related cases on CPR 3.9.  Here I am starting to do the same for costs budgeting.  Here, however, I aim to…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS  FOLLOWING BREACH OF A PEREMPTORY ORDER:  APPLICATION REFUSED:  A WORKING HOLIDAY IS NO EXCUSE

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING BREACH OF A PEREMPTORY ORDER: APPLICATION REFUSED: A WORKING HOLIDAY IS NO EXCUSE

September 7, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Relief from sanctions

In The Financial Conduct Authority v Da Vinci Invest Ltd & Ors [2017] EWHC 2220 (Ch) Mr Justice Snowden rejected a defendant’s application for relief from sanctions for breach of a peremptory order. It is unusual in that the court considered…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: COMPLICATIONS WHEN ACTION AFFECTS PEOPLE NOT PARTIES TO THE ACTION

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: COMPLICATIONS WHEN ACTION AFFECTS PEOPLE NOT PARTIES TO THE ACTION

September 3, 2017 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Singh & Ors v The Charity Commission & Ors [2017] EWHC 2183 (Ch) His Honour Judge Purle QC granted relief from sanctions.  The default was serious and significant and there was no good reason.   The judge was faced with…

DEFENDANT DEBARRED FROM CALLING WITNESS EVIDENCE AT TRIAL: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDING FOR DEFENDANT

August 17, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The case of Durrant -v- Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary is a long-running saga. We have looked at it twice before. The incident occurred in 2009.  In 2013 the Court of Appeal overturned a judge’s decision to grant…

ANOTHER LATE COSTS BUDGET: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED TO ERRANT DEFENDANTS WHO SERVED BUDGET 10 DAYS LATE

ANOTHER LATE COSTS BUDGET: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED TO ERRANT DEFENDANTS WHO SERVED BUDGET 10 DAYS LATE

August 15, 2017 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Mott & Anor v Long & Anor [2017] EWHC 2130 (TCC) His Honour Judge Grant (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered a relief from sanctions application in relation to  defendants who had served a costs budget ten…

COMPLYING WITH DIRECTIONS IN THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL: IT CAN BE A TAXING MATTER: PUBLIC BODIES SHOULD LIVE UP TO THE STANDARDS EXPECTED IN THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION

COMPLYING WITH DIRECTIONS IN THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL: IT CAN BE A TAXING MATTER: PUBLIC BODIES SHOULD LIVE UP TO THE STANDARDS EXPECTED IN THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION

August 3, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The decision of the Supreme Court in  BPP Holdings Ltd & Ors v Revenue and Customs [2017] UKSC 55 is interesting for a number of reasons. It is about the provision of textbooks (on law and accountancy presumably) to students….

WHY LIFE IS NOW  DANGEROUS FOR DEFENDANTS (ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO DON'T FILE A DEFENCE ON TIME)

WHY LIFE IS NOW DANGEROUS FOR DEFENDANTS (ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO DON’T FILE A DEFENCE ON TIME)

July 21, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Default judgment,, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Summary judgment

The judgment of Mr Justice Coulson in ADVA Optical Networking Limited -v- Optron Holding Limited  [2017] EWHC 1813 (TCC) highlights what a dangerous world this can be for defendants. A defendant who is late filing a defence, and where judgment has not been…

INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS AND THE TIME FACTOR: DENTON, WITNESS STATEMENTS AND AMENDMENT:  A HEARING WHEN SEVEN TIMES MORE TIME WAS NEEDED

INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS AND THE TIME FACTOR: DENTON, WITNESS STATEMENTS AND AMENDMENT: A HEARING WHEN SEVEN TIMES MORE TIME WAS NEEDED

July 16, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case, Witness statements

The judgment of Mrs Justice May DBE in Myall -v- Ministry of Defence [2017] EWHC 1752 (QB) emphasises the point that many interlocutory appeals come about not so much because of judicial error but  because of the lack of time…

COSTS BUDGET ONE DAY LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: DON'T MAKE MOUNTAINS OUT OF MOLEHILLS BUT PUT THINGS RIGHT - QUICKLY

COSTS BUDGET ONE DAY LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: DON’T MAKE MOUNTAINS OUT OF MOLEHILLS BUT PUT THINGS RIGHT – QUICKLY

July 6, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There are only two realistic options in relation to a relief from sanctions application: (i) do it properly and promptly; (ii) don’t do it all.  The dangers of a hasty application are illustrated in the judgment in Lakhani -v- Mahmud…

FAILURE TO RESPOND TO PART 18 REQUESTS PROPERLY LEADS TO STRIKE OUT: NO SECOND BITE OF THE CHERRY IN RELATION TO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

FAILURE TO RESPOND TO PART 18 REQUESTS PROPERLY LEADS TO STRIKE OUT: NO SECOND BITE OF THE CHERRY IN RELATION TO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

July 5, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case

There are relatively few reported cases about Part 18 questions.  The decision of the Court of Appeal today in Griffith -v- Gourgey [2017] EWCA Civ 926 shows the dangers of failing to respond fully and properly. “This shows the necessity…

APPEAL STRUCK OUT FOR PROCEDURAL FAILURES: THE IMPORTANCE OF KEEPING THE COURT INFORMED: THE DENTON CRITERIA CONSIDERED

APPEAL STRUCK OUT FOR PROCEDURAL FAILURES: THE IMPORTANCE OF KEEPING THE COURT INFORMED: THE DENTON CRITERIA CONSIDERED

July 5, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In R (on the application of Kaur) -v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department[2017] EWCA Civ 821   Lord Justice Hickinbottom upheld a decision to strike out an appeal because of procedural failures. The case highlights the importance of…

"LATE" SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS WHEN THERE IS NEW EVIDENCE: SOME ISSUES CONSIDERED

“LATE” SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS WHEN THERE IS NEW EVIDENCE: SOME ISSUES CONSIDERED

July 2, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The third reason litigators should read the judgment of  HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a High Court Judge) in Jones -v- Oven [2017] EWHC 1647 (Ch) is the brief discussion in relation to the service of witness evidence outside deadline allowed by…

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS - AN ANALYSIS 3: AN ADJOURNMENT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GRANTED:  A BLAMELESS CLIENT IS NOT A GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS – AN ANALYSIS 3: AN ADJOURNMENT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GRANTED: A BLAMELESS CLIENT IS NOT A GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD

June 20, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Gladwin -v- Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB) Mr Justice Turner overturned an order giving the claimant relief from sanctions following late service of the witness statement. In the third of the series looking at the case more closely we…

APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL TO ALLOW LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS AT TRIAL: CLAIMANT'S APPEAL DISMISSED

APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL TO ALLOW LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS AT TRIAL: CLAIMANT’S APPEAL DISMISSED

June 19, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

There are a surprising number of cases and appeals in relation to late service of witness evidence. In Byrne -v- Mullan [2017] EWHC 1387 (Ch) the claimant made an application to adduce new witness evidence which was heard on the…

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS - AN ANALYSIS 2: WHY (IN THEORY) THE DEFAULTING CLAIMANT COULD STILL RELY ON THE LATE WITNESS EVIDENCE

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS – AN ANALYSIS 2: WHY (IN THEORY) THE DEFAULTING CLAIMANT COULD STILL RELY ON THE LATE WITNESS EVIDENCE

June 19, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Witness statements

In Gladwin -v- Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB) Mr Justice Turner overturned an order giving the claimant relief from sanctions following late service of the witness statement. In the second of the series looking at the case more closely we…

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS - AN ANALYSIS 1: WHAT WENT WRONG

GLADWIN & SANCTIONS – AN ANALYSIS 1: WHAT WENT WRONG

June 14, 2017 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Witness statements

In Gladwin -v- Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB) Mr Justice Turner overturned an order giving the claimant relief from sanctions following late service of the witness statement. In a series looking at the case more closely we look at what…

"THE DOG ATE MY COURTWORK": REASONS, EXCUSES AND EXPLANATIONS IN APPLICATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

“THE DOG ATE MY COURTWORK”: REASONS, EXCUSES AND EXPLANATIONS IN APPLICATIONS FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS

June 14, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

 One thing that the the Denton decision did, without doubt*, was to put an end to the “mandatory” requirement for a “good reason” to explain a breach when applying for relief from sanctions.   However it is always incumbent upon…

NO PLAYING OF THE ADVANTAGE RULE IN CIVIL LITIGATION: LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS LEAD TO CLAIMANT'S CASE BEING SENT OFF: GOOD TRY BUT NO TRIAL

NO PLAYING OF THE ADVANTAGE RULE IN CIVIL LITIGATION: LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS LEAD TO CLAIMANT’S CASE BEING SENT OFF: GOOD TRY BUT NO TRIAL

June 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Witness statements

In Gladwin -v- Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB) Mr Justice Turner uses the English language to its full effect when ruling that a claimant who served a witness statement late should not have been granted relief from sanctions. The case…

STOP USING PROCEDURE TO BULLY  VULNERABLE PEOPLE:  HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS TOLD TO READ DENTON PROPERLY

STOP USING PROCEDURE TO BULLY VULNERABLE PEOPLE: HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS TOLD TO READ DENTON PROPERLY

June 11, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

I have no intention of taking this blog into areas of taxation and customs and excise. However the judgment of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax) in E -v- The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2017] UKFTT 348 (TCC) contains…

DEFERMENT OF PAYMENT OF COSTS NOT PERMITTED: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: 7 DAYS LATE WAS "SERIOUS AND SIGNIFICANT"

DEFERMENT OF PAYMENT OF COSTS NOT PERMITTED: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: 7 DAYS LATE WAS “SERIOUS AND SIGNIFICANT”

June 7, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In The Queen on the application of Bhandal -v- HM Revenue and Customs [2016] EWHC 3387 (Admin) Mr Justice Holroyde dismissed an application deferment of an order to pay costs and an application for relief from sanctions in making the…

SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT, DELAY AND DENTON: "PROMPTNESS" CONSIDERED: DELAY MUST BE EXPLAINED

SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT, DELAY AND DENTON: “PROMPTNESS” CONSIDERED: DELAY MUST BE EXPLAINED

May 29, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment

In Redbourn Group Ltd -v- Fairgate Development Limited [2017] EWHC 1223 (TCC) Mr Justice Coulson refused to set aside a default judgment.  The case contains some important discussion on how the Denton principles apply to applications to set aside judgment. “……

APPEALS, TIME, SERVICE, VENUE: A REAL PROCEDURAL HOTCHPOTCH - EVEN BEFORE THE MAIN ISSUE IS CONSIDERED

APPEALS, TIME, SERVICE, VENUE: A REAL PROCEDURAL HOTCHPOTCH – EVEN BEFORE THE MAIN ISSUE IS CONSIDERED

May 23, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Serving documents

The judgment of Mr Justice Jay in Enniful -v- Motor Insurers Bureau [2017] EWHC 1086 (QB) is a procedural hotchpotch. It relates to service, delay, dates of compliance, venue for appeals and relief from sanctions. All of this occurred before…

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE II: THE ONGOING DEBATE ABOUT COURT FEES

TALES FROM THE APIL CONFERENCE II: THE ONGOING DEBATE ABOUT COURT FEES

May 22, 2017 · by gexall · in Court fees, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Whilst at the conference I attended a session on court fees. The defendant in the case of Wiseman -v- Martins PLC  has sought permission to appeal and there remains a degree of uncertainty in relation to these issues. However there…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: THE CASES:  AN IMPRESSIVE AND THEMATIC LIST

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: THE CASES: AN IMPRESSIVE AND THEMATIC LIST

May 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Useful links

I am grateful to barrister Matthew White for drawing my attention to an impressive table that he has prepared with his colleague Marcus Coates-Walker.  They have set out, in tabular form, the post-Denton cases on relief from sanctions, analysing each…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED IN GROUP LITIGATION CASE:  THE "THIRD STAGE" IN DENTON CONSIDERED IN DETAIL

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED IN GROUP LITIGATION CASE: THE “THIRD STAGE” IN DENTON CONSIDERED IN DETAIL

April 27, 2017 · by gexall · in Group Litigation Orders, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In the judgment today in Kamathi -v- The Foreign & Commonwealth Office [2017] EWHC 939 (QB) Mr Justice Stewart refused an application for relief from sanctions. The Denton principles were considered in detail in the context of a late application…

FILING FORM H: WHEN DOES A CASE HAVE A VALUE OF "LESS THAN £50,000"?  A POINT TO WATCH

FILING FORM H: WHEN DOES A CASE HAVE A VALUE OF “LESS THAN £50,000”? A POINT TO WATCH

April 18, 2017 · by gexall · in Case Management, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There are now several formats for Form H. The “short” one page version is now used in cases where the value is between £25,000 and  “less than £50,000”. Some judges are interpreting this strictly to read between £25,000 and £49,999″….

DELAY, DENTON, APPEALS AND CROSS-APPEALS: EXTENSION OF TIME WOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED

DELAY, DENTON, APPEALS AND CROSS-APPEALS: EXTENSION OF TIME WOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED

April 13, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Pinisetty -v-Manikonda [2017] EWHC 838 (QB) Mr Justice Langstaff considered an issue relating to an appeal (and cross-appeal)  being out of time. Although the judgment on this issue is largely academic (the appeal failed in any event), it contains…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED TO DEFENDANT WHO APPEARED BY COUNSEL: A "SURPRISING STATE OF AFFAIRS" PUT RIGHT

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED TO DEFENDANT WHO APPEARED BY COUNSEL: A “SURPRISING STATE OF AFFAIRS” PUT RIGHT

April 11, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There may well be a term for the process by which a number of decisions, which appeared sensible at the time they were made, lead to a ridiculous result. This principle may well apply to what happened in Falmouth House…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED AFTER SECRETARY OF STATE RELIED UPON AN OUTDATED REFERENCE IN THE WHITE BOOK

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED AFTER SECRETARY OF STATE RELIED UPON AN OUTDATED REFERENCE IN THE WHITE BOOK

March 26, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In AM (Pakistan) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 180 the Court of Appeal granted relief after an appeal was filed late.  The appellant had relied upon an out of date commentary in the white…

ADJOURNMENTS, ILL HEALTH, FAIRNESS AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS CASE MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

ADJOURNMENTS, ILL HEALTH, FAIRNESS AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS CASE MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

March 22, 2017 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Dove -v- London Borough of Havering [2017] EWCA Civ 156 the Court of Appeal considered a number of procedural issues prior to giving judgment on the substantive point.  The defendants argued that they should have been granted an adjournment of…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: COURT OF APPEAL ALLOWS APPEAL AND  GRANTS RELIEF WHEN THE ORIGINAL ORDER WAS PRE-DENTON

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: COURT OF APPEAL ALLOWS APPEAL AND GRANTS RELIEF WHEN THE ORIGINAL ORDER WAS PRE-DENTON

March 17, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

It is surprising, perhaps embarrassing, that the Court of Appeal is still hearing appeals where the judge at first instance applied the pre-Denton approach to relief from sanctions. However a judgment today involved just that*.  In Patterson -v- Spencer [2017]…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED(AFTER THE TRIAL)

February 9, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Relief from sanctions

In the judgment today in  Schenk -v- Cook [2017] EWHC 144 (QB) Mr Justice Green upheld an order refusing relief from sanctions. However the appeal was heard in unusual circumstances. The judge considered the application for relief from sanctions striking…

E-DISCLOSURE: UNLESS ORDERS: STRIKING OUT, COMPLIANCE AND DENTON: DEFENDANTS COME TO GRIEF

February 2, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a lot to consider in the judgment today of Mr Justice Green in Micheal -v- Phillips [2017] EWHC 42 (QB). It relates to inadequate disclosure; retention of electronic documents; peremptory orders and relief from sanctions. Things did not…

DELAY AND NON-COMPLIANCE: ACTION STRUCK OUT: A "GAME CHANGER"

January 4, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Damages, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Striking out, Uncategorized

The judgment of Master Matthew in Phelps -v- Button [2016] EWHC 3185 (Ch) emphasises the dangers of delay and non compliance. “…I will observe that the Court ethos has changed enormously since the days of Lord Denning and the two…

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REFUSED EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH PEREMPTORY ORDER: ORDERS ARE ORDERS

November 24, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Disclosure, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized

In Eaglesham -v- Ministry of Defence [2016] EWHC 3011 (QB) Mrs Justice Andrews DBE refused the defendant’s application for an extension of time for compliance with an unless order. The Defence was struck out. “A party who faces genuine difficulties…

HOURLY RATES, SUCCESS FEES, RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS – ALL IN ONE CASE

November 10, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized

There is a great deal of material covered in the judgment of Master Gordon-Saker in Various Claimants -v- MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B29 (Costs). THE CASE The court was determining various preliminary issues in relation to costs in the “phone…

WITNESS CREDIBILITY, DELAY AND DENTON.

November 2, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized, Witness statements

There is an interesting discussion of  the credibility  of witnesses in the judgment of Mr Registrar Briggs in Preston -v- Green (Liquidator of Cre8atsea Limited) [2016] EWHC 25222 (Ch). The Registrar also had to consider whether to exercise his discretion…

HIGH COURT OVERTURNS DECISION TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: NON-COMPLIANCE CANNOT AMOUNT TO "GOOD REASON"

October 27, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Security for Costs, Uncategorized

  In Pittville Ltd -v- Hunters & Frankau Limited [2016] EWHC 2683 Mr Justice Snowden overturned the decision of a Deputy Master granting relief from sanctions.   The judgment contains an important consideration of the question of “good reasons” for…

NO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WHEN COSTS BUDGET FILED LATE: THE DECISION IN DETAIL

October 18, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized, Useful links

We have looked, briefly, at the Court of Appeal decision in Jamadar -v- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2016] EWCA Civ 1001. I am grateful to Aaron Vodden   of  Hempsons for sending me a copy of the transcript which…

IF THE DEFENCE IS FILED LATE THE CLAIMANT IS STILL ENTITLED TO DEFAULT JUDGMENT: TWO POINTS TO WATCH

September 8, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Default judgment,, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment, Uncategorized

NB THIS DECISION HAS SINCE BEEN OVERTURNED BY A CHANGE IN THE RULES, SEE THE POST HERE. The decision of Deputy Master Pickering in Billington -v- Davies [2016] EWHC 1919 (Ch) illustrates two important principles that are often overlooked. A…

DELAY AND SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT: BALD ASSERTIONS IN AN EXPERT'S REPORT

August 4, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Expert evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment, Uncategorized

The result in Gahir -v- Bansal [2016] EWHC 2041 (QB) (Sir David Eady) is perhaps surprising given the strength of the judge’s observations as to the defendant’s conduct. Despite major unjustified delay an application to set aside a default judgment…

FAILING TO FILE A COST BUDGET AND REFUSAL TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: A HARSH LESSON

July 26, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Case Management, Clinical Negligence, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized

If a litigation solicitor is ever given the job of designing wallpaper here are the three key things that should form the recurring motif. The costs budget is due 21 days before the first case management conference. Where the claim…

COSTS BUDGETING – THE KEY DATES: A QUICK REMINDER TO AVOID A SHARP (BUT NOT NECESSARILY SHORT) SHOCK

July 10, 2016 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Costs budgeting, Court fees, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Uncategorized

You would think that everyone involved in litigation would know that new rules as to cost budgeting came into force on the 6th April 2016. However, judging from some of the blank (and worried) looks I have seen recently when…

DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON COUNTERCLAIM NOT SET ASIDE - AN OBJECT LESSON IN STAYING AWAKE IN LITIGATION

DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON COUNTERCLAIM NOT SET ASIDE – AN OBJECT LESSON IN STAYING AWAKE IN LITIGATION

June 30, 2016 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Default judgment,, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized, Witness statements

The decision of Master Matthews today in Goldcrest Distribution Ltd -v- McCole [2016] EWHC 1571 (Ch) provides an object lesson in the need to stay awake to procedural issues throughout litigation. The claimant had a default judgment on a counterclaim…

PROVING THINGS 23: SERVING IMPORTANT EVIDENCE LATE

June 29, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized, Witness statements

It is surprising how many posts there are on this blog which deal with the late service of witness evidence.  This is an issue that occurs across the whole spectrum of civil procedure.  The question arose again in the judgment…

CLAIMANT ALLOWED TO RELY ON WITNESS EVIDENCE SERVED DURING TRIAL

June 15, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized

Yesterday I looked at a case where a defendant was refused permission to rely upon a witness statement served late,96 although it was served before trial. Today we look at a case where a claimant was given permission to rely…

DEFENDANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO ADDUCE FURTHER EVIDENCE: LATE EVIDENCE IS ALWAYS A PROBLEM

June 14, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case, Uncategorized, Witness statements

  I am grateful to barrister Michelle Fanneran for sending me a copy of the decision of His Honour Judge Cotter QC in the case of Moore -v- Plymouth Hospitals Trust (11th May 2016).  This involves consideration of relief from…

COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURN REFUSAL TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: RE-TRIAL NECESSARY

May 24, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Uncategorized, Witness statements

In McTear -v- Engelhard [2016] EWCA Civ 487 today the Court of Appeal overturned a refusal to grant relief from sanctions.  Consequently there will have to be a re-trial. (The judgment at first instance in this Case was considered in…

← Previous 1 … 8 9 10 … 16 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COST BITES 402: DOES THE FACT THAT LEGAL FEES HAVE BEEN PAID BY RELATIVES MEAN THAT A RESPONDENT IS NOT LIABLE TO PAY COSTS? THE INDEMNITY PRINCIPLE CONSIDERED
  • ASSESSORS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN ADMIRALTY CASES: WHY WERE THEY NECESSARY? APPELLANTS MAY HAVE SUFFERED FROM THAT SINKING FEELING …
  • DEFENDANT GIVEN PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW FROM ADMISSIONS: THE SOLICITORS CONDUCT WAS A “MATTER OF VERY REAL CONCERN” – BUT THE APPLICATION WAS GRANTED
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 80: THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM “FAILED TO FORMULATE A LEGALLY RECOGNISABLE CASE AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT”: THE ACTION WAS STRUCK OUT
  • THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND OTHER TECHNOLOGIES: THE KEY POINTS AND SEVEN USEFUL CHECKLISTS

Top Posts

  • A FIRM OF SOLICITORS ISSUED PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO DO SO: ORDERED TO PAY £900,000 ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: SOME EXPENSIVE LESSONS HERE...
  • COST BITES 386: THREATS TO REPORT THE DEFENDANTS' SOLICITORS TO THE SRA WAS ONE OF THE REASONS THE CLAIMANT HAD TO PAY COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS: WEAPONISERS BEWARE
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE CITATION OF MISLEADING AUTHORITIES: ANOTHER WEEK, ANOTHER CASE: IF YOUR NAME IS ON THE DOCUMENT YOU "OWN" IT...
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: LAWYERS FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT OF EXPERTS LEADS TO EXCLUSION OF THEIR EVIDENCE: EXPERT EVIDENCE IS “NOT A MATTER OF RIGHT” (MAY 2021)
  • COST BITES 385: THE COURTS SHOULD BE WARY OF DECIDING PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES ON A PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT: THIS COULD UNDERMINE THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THE REGIME

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.