APPLICANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY UPON A WITNESS STATEMENT THAT WAS SERVED LATE: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES IS EFFECTIVELY A FORM OF CHEATING

Here we are looking at a case from the family jurisdiction.  Slightly different rules apply, however the overall principles are the same as in the CPR. The judge had to consider whether to grant permission to an applicant to rely…

MEMBER NEWS: HONING IN ON THE INTERNAL RESEARCH FACILITY ON THIS SITE: WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION - SOME GUIDANCE

Yesterday I had an enquiry about the internal search function on this site. In particular whether it used  Boolean operators. It doesn’t but there is a “work around” discussed below.  On a separate issue I also recorded a webinar on…

PART 36: SHOULD THE NORMAL PART 36 CONSEQUENCES APPLY WHEN A CLAIMANT HAD, EFFECTIVELY, OFFERED "NIL" ON A COUNTERCLAIM (THAT FAILED)?

Here we are looking at some interesting arguments on Part 36 put forward by an, obviously disappointed, defendant.  The claimant had beaten its own Part 36 offer and defeated the defendant’s counterclaim totally.  Nevertheless, the defendant argued, this was not…

WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION 2025: WEBINAR 4th AUGUST 2025

This webinar looks at what to do when things go wrong in civil litigation.   There is a continual flow of reports that deal with errors made in relation to limitation, service or someone falling foul of the rules or court…

MEMBER NEWS: THE BACK CATALOGUE 4: WHY CIVIL PROCEDURE CAN SOMETIMES  NOT BE A BUNDLE OF FUN:  AND WHY BUNDLES CAN LEAD TO WASTED COSTS ORDERS...

It may surprise people to know how important bundles are to the conduct of civil litigation. It is even more surprising how problematic they can become.  Posts about bundles, and the problems they can present in civil litigation,  have always…

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS 4: WHO SHOULD PAY THE COSTS WHEN THE CLAIMANT INITIALLY SUED THE WRONG DEFENDANT BUT THE ACTION WAS NOT STRUCK OUT?

Litigators and litigants are always particularly interested in knowing what the costs consequences of a hearing was. We get an opportunity to consider this here, looking at the costs order of a judgment we have already considered.  What should the…

MATTERS "NOT MENTIONED IN THE WITNESS STATEMENT": ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OMISSIONS GIIVING RISE TO ADVERSE CONCLUSIONS

We are looking again at the significance of matters not mentioned in a witness statement.  This is another case where the judge found that there had been significant omissions in the claimant’s evidence.  Again it is a case where these omissions…

KEY OMISSIONS AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: A FAILURE TO MENTION KEY POINTS IN THE STATEMENT DOES NOT HELP THE WITNESS: A WORKING EXAMPLE

The theme for several of the posts today is how important it is to put information, that could be viewed as adverse to the witness, into a witness statement.  If such information is left out, but revealed in cross-examination this…

An earlier post looked at a case where the court struck out large parts of a witness statement of a solicitor who was proposing to give evidence at trial.  Here we look at what happened to the remaining parts of…

MEMBER NEWS: THE BACK CATALOGUE 3: THE COST BITES SERIES  - 258 POSTS SO FAR AND NO SIGN OF STOPPING...

We can wager a bet (for charity of course) that 99.9% of litigators and 100% of litigants who read a judgment think – who paid the costs? The aim of this series, started in July 2022, was to enable practitioners…