THE HOUSE OF COMMONS JUSTICE COMMITTEE: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE COUNTY COURT:  RAT INFESTED BUILDINGS: A "DYSFUNCTIONAL SYSTEM" THAT "HAS FAILED ADEQUATELY" TO DELIVER CIVIL JUSTICE: (NO PAYWALL)

In the Civil Justice system we do not have a figure such as the Secret Barrister who can publicise the major problems that exist in the county court. The House of Commons Justice Committee have gone a long way to…

ORDERS EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM SET ASIDE: THE DUTIES OF THE APPLICANT WERE NOT COMPLIED WITH: THE CLAIMANT COMES TO GRIEF

If there is any application that should make a claimant’s lawyer extremely uncomfortable it is making a without notice application to extend time for service of the claim form.  If you add to this an application (made late) for permission…

ALLOCATION TO THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK OR FAST TRACK IN HOUSING CASES: A JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE (AND A PLUG FOR A WEBINAR ON THAT VERY POINT...)

We are looking at a judgment about allocation in a housing disrepair case.  The story is a common one. The claimant wants the matter allocated to the Fast Track – so costs can be recovered. The defendant wants the matter…

THE INSURER PAID THE COMPANY  BECAUSE YOU WERE CLAIMING AGAINST IT BUT DOES THE COMPANY HAVE TO PAY YOU? COURT OF APPEAL DECISION CONSIDERED

One of the fundamental rules of litigation is to take care that the person you are suing actually has the money to pay damages (and costs).  Often damages are covered by an insurer, however there can be problems if there…

THE COURT WOULD NOT STRIKE OUT A CLAIM BECAUSE OF ERRORS IN THE RESPONSE PACK: "THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE IS NOT FURTHERED BY PARTIES SEEKING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF TECHNICAL BREACHES"

Here we look at a case where a claimant made amendments to the response pack because service was going to take place abroad. The response pack then contained errors in relation to the times by which the defendant should take…

EXPERT'S REPORT DID NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES: ALL PARTIES AGREED IT WAS "FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED" AND COULD NOT BE RELIED UPON: JUDGE STATES THAT EXPERT SHOULD CONSIDER REPAYING THE FEE

Here we are looking a  judgment given last week where all the parties involved in a case agreed that an expert’s report was “fundamentally flawed”.  Part of the report was based on a rejection of findings of fact that had…

COST BITES 256: SHOULD THE COURT MAKE A "SANDERSON" ORDER WHEN A CLAIMANT HAS SUCCEEDED AGAINST ONE DEFENDANT BUT FAILED AGAINST ANOTHER? THE PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

Those who take examinations in civil procedure have to studiously consider the difference between a “Bullock” order and a “Sanderson” order.  Both relate to the liability of one defendant to pay the costs of another. The principles are considered in…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 23: THE DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT HAVE TO GUESS THE CASE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO MEET: CLAIM AGAINST SOLICITOR STRUCK OUT

We are looking at another case where it was held that the claimant’s Particulars of Claim were pleaded in an unsatisfactory manner.  Even at the third attempt of amendment the case did not make sense and the action struck out….

GENERAL DAMAGES FOR PSYCHIATRIC INJURY: THE KEY ISSUES CONSIDERED: WEBINAR 9th JULY 2025

How do awards for pain and suffering for psychiatric injuries differ, if at all, to damages for physical injuries.  What does the court do when there are physical and psychiatric injuries?  What happens if there are multiple injuries?  These are…

SOME IMPORTANT ISSUES IN RELATION TO THE FIXED COSTS REGIME: WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE ORDER WHEN THERE ARE TWO DEFENDANTS? WHAT STAGE HAD THE CASE REACHED WHEN THE ACTION WAS STRUCK OUT? WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE SUM TO BE PAID TO LITIGANTS IN PERSON?

Here we are dealing with a case that bristles with issues in relation to the fixed costs regime.  We have already looked at the same case in relation to the striking out of numerous actions because of defective Particulars of…