A CAUTIONARY TALE FOR LITIGANTS: CLAIMANT ORDERED TO PAY £17,500 IN COSTS IN A SMALL CLAIMS TRACK CASE

I am grateful to barrister Ashley Blood-Halvorsen for bringing my attention to the judgment of District Judge Lumb in Reed -v- Boswell (06/12/2022) a copy of which is available here.   It is a rare example of costs being awarded against…

UNDERSTANDING FATAL ACCIDENT LAW: A SERIES OF FIVE WEBINARS THIS YEAR

Together with solicitor Hilary Wetherell we are presenting a series of five seminars on fatal accident law and litigation. These take you through seeing the client for the first time, understanding the law relating to fatal claims, preparing a Schedule,…

COST BITES 42: INDEMNITY COSTS, CONDUCT AND CORRECTING MISTAKES:  PROVIDING SUFFICIENT MATERIAL ON ASSESSMENT IS ESSENTIAL

In  Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings Inc [2023] EWHC 9 (SCCO) Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker held that a claimant was only entitled to 70% of its costs of assessment.  There were difficulties in the way that the claimant had…

Every so often there are discussions on Twitter about the appropriate fonts for lawyers to use. At times these can be heated discussions, including consideration of whether the use of the word “fonts” is itself appropriate.   This led me to…

EXPERT EVIDENCE: KING CRIMSON, KANYE WEST: CONSIDERATION OF THE PRINCIPLES (AND THE COSTS): WE ARE IN THE 21st CENTURY NOW

In  Declan Colgan Music Ltd v Umg Recordings, Inc [2023] EWHC 4 (Ch) Deputy Master Henderson refused the claimant’s application for permission to call expert evidence in relation to the construction and consequences of an agreement to licence music.  There…

COST BITES 41: PREJUDGMENT INTEREST ON COSTS - CONSIDERED BUT REFUSED

In Adcock & Ors v Blemain Finance Ltd [2022] EWHC 3280 (SCCO) Costs Judge Whalan considered, and rejected,  the claimants’ arguments that they should have pre-judgment interest on costs.   “It is clear nonetheless that the incipitur rule constitutes the…

THE COURTS IN AN ERA OF AUSTERITY: BROKEN LIFTS AND BROKEN PROMISES

It would be a pity if the speech of  Sir James Munby THE FAMILY COURT IN AN ERA OF AUSTERITY: PROBLEMS AND PRIORITIES is only read by family lawyers.  There is much of interest to all litigators. It was a…

A CLEAR WARNING FOR THOSE WHO SIGN WITNESS STATEMENTS AND SOLICITORS WHO SIGN STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: IT IS NOT A JUNGLE OUT THERE

In Cumbria Zoo Company Ltd v The Zoo Investment Company Ltd [2022] EWHC 3379 (Ch) HHJ Pearce sent out an important message to those who sign witness statements. He also sent out an, arguably more important message, to those solicitors…

DO YOU WANT TO BE A LEGAL BLOGGER? A TRAINING EVENT BY ZOOM - 5th FEBRUARY 2023

The Transparency Project  is looking for legal bloggers, training will be provided  Full details of the project can be found here. THE NEW INITIATIVE   “At the end of January 2023, a new reporting pilot will launch in three courts…

FIRST  POST ON PART 36 IN 2023: IT WAS NOT UNJUST FOR THE DEFENDANTS TO BEAR THE NORMAL CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO BEAT CLAIMANTS' PART 36 OFFER

In Von Westenholz & Ors v Gregson & Anor [2022] EWHC 3374 (Ch) Robin Vox, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, found that it was not unjust for the defendants to face the normal consequences of failing to beat…

Choosing a case of the year is never easy.  There are many significant judgments throughout a year all of which have an impact on civil procedure. However this year I am returning to a decision in January. The decision of…

WHEN THE DEFENDANTS FAILED TO BEAT THE CLAIMANTS' PART 36 OFFER, BUT MONEY IS NOT DUE IMMEDIATELY: WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES?

We are looking again at the judgment of Mr Justice Hildyard in Grant & Ors v FR Acquisitions Corporation (Europe) Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 3366 (Ch). Having determined that a valid and effective Part 36 offer had been made by…

Our annual review continues with the best “opening lines of judgments” for 2022.  This year there are a number of strong international contenders. Worries about misguided endeavours The Serious Fraud Office & Anor v Litigation Capital Ltd [2022] EWHC 3053…

Some stranger statistics from the blog this year. Looking at the busiest times, the busiest day, referrers and the countries that visit most (and least).   BUSIEST DAY AND TIME The busiest day is Tuesday. The busiest time is 11.00…

PART 36 APPLIED TO COMPLEX OFFER: PART 36 WAS ENGAGED AND THE NORMAL CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWED

In  Grant & Ors v FR Acquisitions Corporation (Europe) Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 3366 (Ch) Mr Justice Hildyard considered whether Part 36 applied to a complex offer made by the applicants.  This post looks at the judgment relating to…

2022 IN REVIEW (1) : SOME FACTS AND FIGURES

2022 has been another busy year on this blog. It is always interesting to see what people have been reading.  The most recent posts are not always the most read.  Instead posts on basic issues, from earlier years, dominate the…

ANOTHER POTENTIAL BREACH OF AN EMBARGO ON A JUDGMENT: JUDGE DECIDES TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION TO INVESTIGATE

The judgment in  Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 3343 (KB) shows a variation on the risks of disclosing the contents of an embargoed judgment.  The claimant did not disclose the full judgment but various messages on social media could be…

AN ACTION ISSUED ON BEHALF OF AN ESTATE BY SOMEONE WITHOUT AUTHORITY AT THE TIME OF ISSUE IS "A DEAD THING INTO WHICH NO LIFE COULD BE INFUSED"

One search term that regularly leads people to this site is “can I issue on behalf of an estate when I don’t have letters of administration”.  There are variations on this, but the central theme is always the same.   The…

COST BITES 40: NO ONE GETS THE COSTS OF AN AMENDMENT (WHICH WERE FAR TOO HIGH ANYWAY)

In Walter Hugh Merricks CBE v Mastercard Incorporated and Others [2022] CAT 52 the Competition Appeal Tribunal considered the principles relating to the costs of amendments to statements of case after a contested hearing. On the facts of this case…

IF YOU DON'T COMPLY WITH THE RULES RELATING TO WITNESS STATEMENTS YOUR CASE CAN (AND THIS CASE DID) GO DOWN THE DRAIN

In Brendon International Ltd v Water Plus Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 3321 (Ch)HHJ Cadwallader (sitting as a High Court Judge) found that numerous elements of the defendant’s witness statements were defective and non-compliant with the rules.  The case is…

DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE, AND FOR A FOUR YEAR STAY, REFUSED: JUSTICE IS ACHIEVED BY THE TRIAL DATE BEING MET

In Benford (A Child) v East And North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (Rev1) [2022] EWHC 3263 (KB) Mr Justice Ritchie refused the defendant’s application for an adjournment of a trial date. The defendant argued that medical uncertainty meant that it was…

We are returning to the decision on Mr Justice Cavanagh in Shepherd & Co Solicitors v Brealey [2022] EWHC 3229 (KB) to consider another aspect of the rules relating to costs.  The solicitors were seeking to persuade the court to…

A DRAFT JUDGMENT IS NOT AN INVITATION FOR A SECOND BITE OF THE CHERRY: HIGH COURT JUDGMENT TODAY

In Shepherd & Co Solicitors v Brealey [2022] EWHC 3229 (KB) Mr Justice Cavanagh made some observations on the practice of making submissions once a judgment is sent out in draft.  This was not an invitation to the parties to…

ANOTHER QOCS AND PART 36 CASE: COURT MAKING ORDER UNDER PART 36 DID NOT LEAD TO QOCS PROTECTION BEING OUSTED

In University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust -v- Harrison [2022] EWCA Civ 1660 *  the Court of Appeal rejected the defendant’s argument that QOCS protection was lost when the court was called upon to make an order…

SHOULD AN ISSUE IN THE REPLY BE IN THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM? A WORKING EXAMPLE

In Griffiths & Anor v Gilbert [2022] EWHC 3122 (TCC) HHJ Sarah Watson considered a pleading issue.  Should a point made in a Reply have been pleaded in the Particulars of Claim.  She held that, on the facts of that…

QOCS PROTECTION APPLIED TO THE PERIOD BEFORE THE CLAIM WAS AMENDED TO PLEAD A CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURY: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY

In Pathan v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2022] EWHC 3244 (KB) Mr Justice Bourne held that an action could not become subject to QOCS part way through. If the claim was a personal injury claim at trial then…

IF YOU DON'T SAY WHO YOU ARE THEN YOU CANNOT ARGUE POINTS AT A DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

In Wright v Person Or Persons Unknown Responsible for the Operation and Publication of the Website bitcoin.org [2022] EWHC 2982 (SCCO) Costs Judge Rowley held that if a paying party wanted to take part in a detailed assessment of costs…

WHEN THE WORDING OF THE CLAIM FORM COMES UNDER CLOSE SCRUTINY: SOMETHING TO REMEMBER

The precise wording of the claim form came under close scrutiny in the judgment of Mr Justice Trower in Honda Group-UK Pension Scheme Trustee Ltd & Ors v Mercer Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 3197 (Ch).  It is one of…

CLAIMANT'S LATE ACCEPTANCE OF A PART 36 OFFER DID NOT PERMIT DEFENDANT TO SET OFFCOSTS AGAINST DAMAGES: QOCS PRINCIPLES REIGN SUPREME

In  Chappell v Mrozek [2022] EWHC 3147 (KB) Master Stevens rejected the defendant’s argument that the defendant’s entitlement to costs, arising from late acceptance of a Part 36 offer,  could be enforced from the claimant’s damages.  The judgment examines the…

TIME FOR CHALLENGING SOLICITOR'S BILL HAD NOT PASSED: CLAIMANT'S APPEAL ALLOWED AND ASSESSMENT TO PROCEED

NB THIS DECISION WAS OVERTURNED ON APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL SEE Menzies v Oakwood Solicitors Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 844 In  Menzies v Oakwood Solicitors Ltd [2022] EWHC 3199 (KB) Mr Justice Bourne allowed an appeal on the…

COST BITES 38: THE COSTS OF AN APPEAL SHOULD BE PAID BY THE LOSING PARTIES

In Frasers Group Plc v The Official Receiver & Ors [2022] EWHC 3184 (Ch)  Sir Paul Morgan (sitting as a judge of the Chancery Division) held that the appropriate order, following a successful appeal, was for the respondents to the…

WHEN COSTS INCURRED AT A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ARE ORDERED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT: DON'T ALWAYS ASSUME IT WILL BE "COSTS IN THE CASE"

It may be imprudent to assume that arguments that take place at the case management stage will always be subject to an order for costs in the case. In University of Manchester v John McAslan & Partners Ltd & Anor…

SEDLEY'S LAWS  IN THE MODERN AGE: ELECTRONIC BUNDLES "SOME OF THE PAGES MUST APPEAR UPSIDE DOWN, PREFERABLY AT SPORADIC INTERVALS"

The post yesterday on Sedley’s Laws of documents led to me to consider how this should be applied in the modern age. More specifically to electronic bundles.  These musings led to contributions from the lawyers of Twitter.  We clearly have…