Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login

Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers

Browse: Page 60
WHEN AN EMAIL FROM A SOLICITOR IS EVIDENCE OF LOSS: EVIDENCE AT THE STAGE 3 STAGE CONSIDERED ON APPEAL

WHEN AN EMAIL FROM A SOLICITOR IS EVIDENCE OF LOSS: EVIDENCE AT THE STAGE 3 STAGE CONSIDERED ON APPEAL

October 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Witness statements

I am grateful to barrister Sarah Robson for bringing my attention to the decision of HHJ Jarman QC in Akram v Aviva Insurance Ltd [2021] EW Misc 16 (CC).  This is a case that highlights the flexibility the courts have…

DELAY IN PURSUING PROCEEDINGS IS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS: LOCAL AUTHORITY’S INSOUCIENCE A CAUSE FOR CONCERN

October 4, 2021 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Injunctions, Members Content

In London Borough of Havering & Ors v Persons Unknown & Ors [2021] EWHC 2648 (QB) Mr Justice Nicklin had some clear warnings to give in relation to cases where local authorities had failed to pursue cases promptly after obtaining…

NO MATTER HOW BIG YOU ARE, OR HOW IMPORTANT (YOU THINK) YOU ARE -  YOU HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES: SECRETARY OF STATE REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE

NO MATTER HOW BIG YOU ARE, OR HOW IMPORTANT (YOU THINK) YOU ARE – YOU HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES: SECRETARY OF STATE REFUSED PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE

October 4, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Conduct, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

In  Good Law Project Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC) Mr Justice Fraser issued a clear and stark warning that expert evidence has to comply with the…

A CASE SUMMARY SHOULD BE IMPARTIAL NOT AN EXTENSION OF A SKELETON ARGUMENT

A CASE SUMMARY SHOULD BE IMPARTIAL NOT AN EXTENSION OF A SKELETON ARGUMENT

October 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Beg v Beg & Ors [2021] EWHC 2598 (Ch) HHJ Cooke made some important points about the need for a case summary to be impartial. “A case summary, whether or not an agreed document, is intended to summarise the…

ASSESSING BILLS OF COSTS: GIVE DETAILS OF THE SIGNATORY AND OF THE FEE EARNERS OR YOUR BILL WILL STRUCK OUT: "AN OUNCE OF OPENNESS IS CHEAPER THAN ANY ARGUMENT"

ASSESSING BILLS OF COSTS: GIVE DETAILS OF THE SIGNATORY AND OF THE FEE EARNERS OR YOUR BILL WILL STRUCK OUT: “AN OUNCE OF OPENNESS IS CHEAPER THAN ANY ARGUMENT”

October 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to solicitor Benjamin T Petrecz  for drawing my decision to the judgment in  Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust v AKC [2021] EWHC 2607 (QB) Mrs Justice Steyn (sitting with an assessor Master Brown) allowed…

INTERIM PAYMENTS: THE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS CONSIDERED BY THE COURTS

INTERIM PAYMENTS: THE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS CONSIDERED BY THE COURTS

September 30, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Damages, Interim Payments, Members Content, Personal Injury

Later today I am presenting a webinar on interim payments.  It is difficult, if not impossible, to discuss all possible permutations in relation to interim payments during a one hour slot and this post supplements the webinar. Here we look…

INTERIM PAYMENTS WHEN THERE ARE A NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS: THE PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

INTERIM PAYMENTS WHEN THERE ARE A NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS: THE PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

September 29, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Interim Payments, Members Content, Personal Injury

I am grateful to barrister Michael Lemmy for sending me a copy of the Court of Appeal judgment today in Buttar Construction Ltd -v- Arshdeep [2021] EWCA Civ 1408.  The Court considered arguments about whether an interim payment should have…

PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE CANNOT BE A FISHING EXPEDITION: A JUDGE WILL NOT DO THE PRUNING FOR AN APPLICANT

PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE CANNOT BE A FISHING EXPEDITION: A JUDGE WILL NOT DO THE PRUNING FOR AN APPLICANT

September 28, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Disclosure, Members Content

The judgment of Deputy Master Brightwell in Willow Sports Ltd v Sportslocker24.com Ltd & Anor [2021] EWHC 2524 (Ch) is a reminder of how difficult it can be to obtain pre-action disclosure, particularly in commercial cases. It is also a…

BUDGETED COSTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE LOWEST COSTS ( & THE COURT SHOULD ADOPT A CAUTIOUS APPROACH TO MAKING COMMENTS IN RELATION TO INCURRED COSTS): HIGH COURT DECISION

BUDGETED COSTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE LOWEST COSTS ( & THE COURT SHOULD ADOPT A CAUTIOUS APPROACH TO MAKING COMMENTS IN RELATION TO INCURRED COSTS): HIGH COURT DECISION

September 27, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

In Discovery Land Company, LLC & Ors v Axis Specialty Europe SE [2021] EWHC 2146 (Comm) Peter MacDonald Eggers QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) set out some of the principles relating to costs budgeting, in…

MISSING WITNESSES: THE SUPREME COURT SAYS IT IS REALLY A MATTER OF COMMON SENSE

MISSING WITNESSES: THE SUPREME COURT SAYS IT IS REALLY A MATTER OF COMMON SENSE

September 26, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has looked, many times, at the inferences that courts draw when witnesses do not give evidence at court. In Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi [2021] UKSC 33 the Supreme Court made it clear that the principles involved…

EXPERTS GIVING EVIDENCE IS "NOT A GAME": £1.4 MILLION VALUATION FOUND TO BE £3,230

EXPERTS GIVING EVIDENCE IS “NOT A GAME”: £1.4 MILLION VALUATION FOUND TO BE £3,230

September 24, 2021 · by gexall · in Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

Another interesting part of the judgment of ICC Judge Barber in  CSB 123 Ltd, Re [2021] EWHC 2506 (Ch) is the judge’s findings in relation to the expert evidence.  It is rare for a judge to state to an expert witness…

LITIGATION, DELAY AND THE DOCTRINE OF LACHES: IT WOULD BE "UNCONSCIONABLE FOR THE COURT TO GRANT THE APPLICANT ANY RELIEF"

LITIGATION, DELAY AND THE DOCTRINE OF LACHES: IT WOULD BE “UNCONSCIONABLE FOR THE COURT TO GRANT THE APPLICANT ANY RELIEF”

September 24, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Limitation, Members Content

The judgment of ICC Judge Barber in  CSB 123 Ltd, Re [2021] EWHC 2506 (Ch)is interesting for a large number of reasons.  Not least the total failure of the applicant to establish major (if not all) parts of its case,…

PEREMEPTORY ORDERS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 2: MAKING CONCESSIONS AND PUTTING ALL YOUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET

PEREMEPTORY ORDERS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 2: MAKING CONCESSIONS AND PUTTING ALL YOUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET

September 23, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There are twp other aspects of the Court of Appeal judgment in Poule Securities Ltd v Howe & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1373 that merit consideration.  Firstly the claimant’s decision to make one application; the second related to concessions made…

CONSTRUING PEREMPTORY ORDERS: THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE IS THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

CONSTRUING PEREMPTORY ORDERS: THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE IS THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

September 23, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out

In Poule Securities Ltd v Howe & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1373 the Court of Appeal considered the construction of an “unless” order.  It was held that the date for compliance on the order had to be construed as the…

SERVING PROCEEDINGS ON "PERSONS UNKNOWN": AN ONGOING ISSUE - WITH NO EASY ANSWER

SERVING PROCEEDINGS ON “PERSONS UNKNOWN”: AN ONGOING ISSUE – WITH NO EASY ANSWER

September 22, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In the course of his judgment in  The London Borough of Hackney v Grant& Ors [2021] EWHC 2548 (QB) Mr Justice Lavender considered the issue of service on persons unknown. WEBINAR ON SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM On the 24th…

WHEN A BARRISTER IS CALLED TO GIVE EVIDENCE AS TO WHAT HAPPENED AT (OR OUTSIDE) COURT: PRIVILEGE IN DRAFT WITNESS STATEMENT WAIVED AS A RESULT OF IT BEING SHOWN TO COUNSEL

WHEN A BARRISTER IS CALLED TO GIVE EVIDENCE AS TO WHAT HAPPENED AT (OR OUTSIDE) COURT: PRIVILEGE IN DRAFT WITNESS STATEMENT WAIVED AS A RESULT OF IT BEING SHOWN TO COUNSEL

September 21, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Axnoller Events Ltd v Brake & Anor (cross-examination on a draft witness statement) [2021] EWHC 2539 (Ch) HHJ Paul Matthews considered the unusual circumstances whereby a barrister gave evidence, and was cross-examined, on what happened at (or outside) a…

CLAIMANT NOT ALLOWED TO PURSUE POINTLESS COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS: "THE DISPROPORTIONATE PURSUIT OF POINTLESS LITIGATION IS AN ABUSE"

CLAIMANT NOT ALLOWED TO PURSUE POINTLESS COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS: “THE DISPROPORTIONATE PURSUIT OF POINTLESS LITIGATION IS AN ABUSE”

September 21, 2021 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Committal proceedings, Members Content

In Pharmagona Ltd v Taheri & Anor [2021] EWHC 2537 (Ch) Mr Justice Snowden refused an application by a claimant to issue an application for committal.  A breach, if established, would be of the most technical kind. Further the defendants…

RUDE CORRESPONDENCE: A RECAP: JUST REMEMBER WHAT YOU WRITE COULD END UP ON A BLOG SOME DAY (FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO SEE...)

RUDE CORRESPONDENCE: A RECAP: JUST REMEMBER WHAT YOU WRITE COULD END UP ON A BLOG SOME DAY (FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO SEE…)

September 20, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

Several search terms that led people to this blog today related to the “arrogant tone of solicitor correspondence”.  This seems like a good time to recap on Guidance and case law where, shall we say “assertive” correspondence has been considered…

JUDGE WAS WRONG TO ALLOCATE ACTION TO SMALL CLAIMS TRACK: CLAIMANT SUCCEEDS IN APPEAL AND CASE ALLOCATED TO THE FAST TRACK

JUDGE WAS WRONG TO ALLOCATE ACTION TO SMALL CLAIMS TRACK: CLAIMANT SUCCEEDS IN APPEAL AND CASE ALLOCATED TO THE FAST TRACK

September 20, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In  Elias & Anor v Blemain Finance Ltd [2021] EW Misc 15 (CC) HHJ Keyser QC overturned a decision allocation an action to the small claims track. The matter was re-allocated to the fast track. “… it seems to me…

JUDGE WAS CORRECT TO ORDER DEFENDANT TO FACE NORMAL CONSEQUENCES WHEN CLAIMANT BEAT THEIR OWN PART 36 OFFER: HIGH COURT DECISION

September 20, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Damages, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Part 36

There is another aspect of the judgment in Elgamal v Westminster City Council [2021] EWHC 2510 (QB) that needs consideration.  The judgment on fundamental dishonesty was considered in the previous post.  The defendant was unsuccessful in their appeal against the…

EXAGGERATION OF INJURIES IS NOT NECESSARILY FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: HIGH COURT DECISION

EXAGGERATION OF INJURIES IS NOT NECESSARILY FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: HIGH COURT DECISION

September 17, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Damages, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Personal Injury

In Elgamal v Westminster City Council [2021] EWHC 2510 (QB) Mr Justice Jacobs rejected an appeal from a defendant that argued the trial judge should have found a claimant to be fundamentally dishonest. “The Defendant’s argument, based on the word…

ANOTHER ROUND IN A LONG-RUNNING SOLICITOR-CLIENT COSTS DISPUTE: JUDGE REFUSES APPLICATION FOR A STAY AND FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS.

ANOTHER ROUND IN A LONG-RUNNING SOLICITOR-CLIENT COSTS DISPUTE: JUDGE REFUSES APPLICATION FOR A STAY AND FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS.

September 17, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

In Edwards & Ors v Slater & Gordon UK Ltd [2021] EWHC B19 (Costs) Costs Judge Rowley considered several procedural issues in relation to ongoing solicitor and own-client assessments. THE CASE Some 134 cases are being brought by Clear Legal…

SUING AN IMPECUNIOUS DEFENDANT IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE: LOOK AT YOUR OWN CLIENT'S INSURANCE POLICY...

SUING AN IMPECUNIOUS DEFENDANT IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE: LOOK AT YOUR OWN CLIENT’S INSURANCE POLICY…

September 16, 2021 · by gexall · in Damages, Enforcement, Members Content, Personal Injury

Every couple of years I repost the second post ever on this blog -“suing the man of straw”. The points made remain a surprise to many. An injured claimant may be able to recover unpaid damages from their own insurer….

SERIES OF WEBINARS ON CIVIL EVIDENCE: COMING TO YOUR SCREENS SOON

SERIES OF WEBINARS ON CIVIL EVIDENCE: COMING TO YOUR SCREENS SOON

September 15, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Disclosure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Webinar

Now that the nights are drawing in people’s thoughts will, almost invariably, be drawn towards matters of civil evidence and the need to prove things. To cater for this I am presenting six webinars , covering key aspects of civil…

SERVICE OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: IMPORTANT POINTS TO WATCH: "A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY"

SERVICE OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: IMPORTANT POINTS TO WATCH: “A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY”

September 14, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

We have seen many cases in relation to late service of the claim form.    Different rules, and assumptions, apply to the particulars of claim.  Over the years there have been many cases where service of the Particulars has caused…

A TOMLIN ORDER CAN BE ENFORCED IN THE ORIGINAL ACTION

September 13, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Trebisol Sud Ouest SAS & Anor v Berkley Finance Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 2494 (QB) Charles Morrison (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) considered the issue of whether the terms of Tomlin Order are enforceable within the…

CHILD PEDESTRIAN WAS NOT CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENT: HIGH COURT DECISION

CHILD PEDESTRIAN WAS NOT CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENT: HIGH COURT DECISION

September 13, 2021 · by gexall · in Members Content, Personal Injury

In A (a minor) by her litigation friend FA -v- Akram [2021] EWHC 2467 (QB), 2021 WL 04111024  HHJ Bird (sitting as a High Court judge) rejected an argument that a nine year old child had been contributory negligent.  It…

WHEN A CLAIMANT'S SOLICITOR WAS "SURPRISED" ABOUT THE RULES RELATING TO SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM (THIS DIDN'T END WELL)

WHEN A CLAIMANT’S SOLICITOR WAS “SURPRISED” ABOUT THE RULES RELATING TO SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM (THIS DIDN’T END WELL)

September 13, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Webinar

A number of people have kindly written to point out that issues relating to service of the claim form are in the news at the moment. The subject may have an interest beyond those of us involved in civil procedure. …

DISCUSSIONS TO SELL LAND WERE WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND COULD NOT BE RELIED UPON AT HEARING: THE WITHOUT PREJUDICE RULE EXAMINED

DISCUSSIONS TO SELL LAND WERE WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND COULD NOT BE RELIED UPON AT HEARING: THE WITHOUT PREJUDICE RULE EXAMINED

September 12, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content

In  Windmill Holdings SPV Ltd v Adams & Anor (LAND REGISTRATION – ADVERSE POSSESSION – evidence) [2021] UKUT 228 (LC)  The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), Judge Elizabeth Cooke, upheld the decision of the First-tier tribunal excluding certain evidence on the…

WHEN IS PERSONAL SERVICE EFFECTED? A CASE THAT REVIEWED THE PRINCIPLES

WHEN IS PERSONAL SERVICE EFFECTED? A CASE THAT REVIEWED THE PRINCIPLES

September 11, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

Since issues relating to personal service of proceedings are in the news this may a good time to review the principles. In Tseitline -v- Mikhelson [2015] EWHC 3065 (Comm) Mr Justice Phillips reviewed the rules as to whether effective personal…

SECTION 33 CONSIDERED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL:  TRIAL JUDGE WAS CORRECT TO EXERCISE THEIR DISCRETION

SECTION 33 CONSIDERED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: TRIAL JUDGE WAS CORRECT TO EXERCISE THEIR DISCRETION

September 9, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Limitation, Members Content, Personal Injury

In Blackpool Football Club Ltd v DSN [2021] EWCA Civ 1352 the Court of Appeal considered, and upheld, a decision on Section 33 where the discretion was exercised in favour of the claimant.  This was in the context, however, of…

DIDN'T FILE A SCHEDULE: COSTS CONFINED TO COUNSEL'S FEES

DIDN’T FILE A SCHEDULE: COSTS CONFINED TO COUNSEL’S FEES

September 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

In Mahandru v Nielson [2021] EWHC 2297 (QB) Mrs Justice Steyn DBE considered what costs should be awarded when a respondent had successfully defended an appeal but not filed a costs schedule.  The answer, in that case, was to simply…

NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 3: PERMISSION TO APPEAL FROM FIRST INSTANCE JUDGEAFTER ADJOURNMENT

NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 3: PERMISSION TO APPEAL FROM FIRST INSTANCE JUDGEAFTER ADJOURNMENT

September 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Rule Changes

The rules  currently provide that application for permission to appeal to the judge who made the decision must be made to the lower court at the hearing at which the decision to be appealed was made. If an application is…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GRANTED AFTER A NINE YEAR DELAY

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GRANTED AFTER A NINE YEAR DELAY

September 7, 2021 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Francis v F Berndes Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 2350 (Ch) Deputy Master Linwood dismissed the claimant’s application to resurrect an application to amend which had been made nine years previously.   THE CASE The claimant brought an action…

NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 2: PROHIBITION ON RECORDING IN COURT EXTENDED BEYOND "TAPE RECORDERS"

NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 2: PROHIBITION ON RECORDING IN COURT EXTENDED BEYOND “TAPE RECORDERS”

September 7, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Rule Changes

Another amendment introduced by The Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 4) Rules 2021 is an addition to the definition section of CPR Part 2 to make it clear that the prohibition on “tape recording” extends to any other device that can be…

NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 1: VOLUNTARY INTERIM PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN AND PROTECTED PARTIES

NEW RULES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 1ST OCTOBER 1: VOLUNTARY INTERIM PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN AND PROTECTED PARTIES

September 7, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Interim Payments, Members Content, Rule Changes, Webinar

There is a new batch of rules coming into force on the 1st October 2021, introduced by The Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 4) Rules 2021. Here we look at the rules relating to interim payments.   WHAT THE CHANGES DO…

WHY NOT KNOWING THE RULES ABOUT SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM COULD COST YOU MORE THAN YOU WILL EVER EARN...

WHY NOT KNOWING THE RULES ABOUT SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM COULD COST YOU MORE THAN YOU WILL EVER EARN…

September 6, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Webinar

So far this year there have been over half a dozen cases relating to mis-service of the claim form reported on this blog.   In many of the cases the claimant’s difficulties appear to be virtually self-inflicted.   Several of the cases…

PROVING THINGS 216: THE DANGERS OF RELYING ON EXPERT REPORT TO PROVE VALUE

PROVING THINGS 216: THE DANGERS OF RELYING ON EXPERT REPORT TO PROVE VALUE

September 3, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Experts, Members Content

There are some similarities between the case of Serene Construction Ltd v Salata and Associates Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 2433 (Ch) and the previous post in this series. In both cases the claimant’s case related to the valuation of…

COURT FEES INCREASE: READ ALL ABOUT IT: COMING TO A COURT NEAR YOU SOON

COURT FEES INCREASE: READ ALL ABOUT IT: COMING TO A COURT NEAR YOU SOON

September 2, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Court fees, Members Content

After a consultation process the Ministry of Justice has produced “Court and Tribunal Fees The Government response to the  consultation on ‘Increasing selected court fees and Help with Fees income thresholds by inflation’ IN A NUTSHELL Court fees will be…

PROVING THINGS 215: CLAIM £8.7 MILLION IN DAMAGES BUT RECOVER NOTHING: NOT SO MUCH A CASE OF EXPERT SHOPPING BUT EXPERTS ON SHOPPING CENTRES

PROVING THINGS 215: CLAIM £8.7 MILLION IN DAMAGES BUT RECOVER NOTHING: NOT SO MUCH A CASE OF EXPERT SHOPPING BUT EXPERTS ON SHOPPING CENTRES

September 2, 2021 · by gexall · in Damages, Experts, Members Content

We have looked before at the judgment of HHJ Hodge (sitting as a High Court judge) in Ahuja Investments Ltd v Victorygame Ltd & Anor (CONTRACT – Purchase of commercial investment property) [2021] EWHC 2382 (Ch).  It is worth noting that…

THAT CASE WHERE A CLAIMANT'S LAWYERS FAILED TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY (THE SECOND TIME AGAINST THE SOLICITORS WHO WERE NEGLIGENT ON THE FIRST OCCASION)

THAT CASE WHERE A CLAIMANT’S LAWYERS FAILED TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY (THE SECOND TIME AGAINST THE SOLICITORS WHO WERE NEGLIGENT ON THE FIRST OCCASION)

September 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Professional negligence,, Service of the claim form, Webinar

If ever a case illustrated the dangers of not appreciating the rules as to service of the claim form.  Dzekova -v- Thomas Eggar LLP [2015] EWHC 2600 (QB) which we have looked  briefly before.   It reveals a sorry tale of…

PERSONAL INJURY ACTION BROUGHT AFTER EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL SETTLEMENT NOT AN ABUSE OF PROCESS: THE DEFENDANT HAS GOT WHAT IT SIGNED UP TO…

September 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Applications, Members Content, Personal Injury

In Farnham-Oliver v RM Educational Resources Ltd [2021] EWHC 2418 (QB) Master Dagnall rejected an argument that personal injury proceedings, brought after employment proceedings had been settled, were an abuse of process. The settlement agreement had specifically stated that it…

CIVIL EVIDENCE: MISSING WITNESSES, HAMLET: "THE REST IS SILENCE...": OH, AND IT IS THE JUDGE THAT IS ON TRIAL

CIVIL EVIDENCE: MISSING WITNESSES, HAMLET: “THE REST IS SILENCE…”: OH, AND IT IS THE JUDGE THAT IS ON TRIAL

August 30, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content

The judgment of HHJ Hodge (sitting as a High Court judge) in Ahuja Investments Ltd v Victorygame Ltd & Anor (CONTRACT – Purchase of commercial investment property) [2021] EWHC 2382 (Ch) is one of interest to anyone involved in litigation…

FATAL ACCIDENT DAMAGES: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS WIDOW'S CLAIM TO DAMAGES BASED ON "PRACTICAL REALITY"

FATAL ACCIDENT DAMAGES: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS WIDOW’S CLAIM TO DAMAGES BASED ON “PRACTICAL REALITY”

August 30, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Damages, Fatal Accidents, Members Content

In Paramount Shopfitting Company Ltd v Rix [2021] EWCA Civ 1172 the Court of Appeal rejected a defendant’s appeal in relation to the assessment of damages awarded to a widow. The widow’s husband had run a successful business.  The fact that…

THE COSTS OF REPAIRS AND THE COSTS OF THE ACTION: HOW SHOULD THE VALUE OF REPAIRS BE ASSESSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOCATION

THE COSTS OF REPAIRS AND THE COSTS OF THE ACTION: HOW SHOULD THE VALUE OF REPAIRS BE ASSESSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOCATION

August 30, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

NB IN Mary-Ann Stojalowski v Bristol City Council [2024] EWCC 30 HHJ Blohm KC held that this case was “wrongly decided”, see the discussion here. I am grateful to Alex Bagnall from Total Legal Solutions for sending me a copy…

LOOKING AT A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT: WHAT IS BEING ASSESSED? HOURLY RATES AND CAN LONDON SOLICITORS BE JUSTIFIED?

LOOKING AT A SUMMARY ASSESSMENT: WHAT IS BEING ASSESSED? HOURLY RATES AND CAN LONDON SOLICITORS BE JUSTIFIED?

August 25, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content, Summary assessment,

Sometimes it is interesting to see what happens in summary assessments.  Very few are reported and looking at those that are can help litigators get a “feel” for the process.  In this respect of the judgment of HHJ Matthews (sitting…

ATTEMPT TO INTRODUCE EXPERT EVIDENCE REFUSED: EVIDENCE NOT ADMISSIBLE AND APPLICATION MADE FAR TOO LATE

ATTEMPT TO INTRODUCE EXPERT EVIDENCE REFUSED: EVIDENCE NOT ADMISSIBLE AND APPLICATION MADE FAR TOO LATE

August 24, 2021 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Fraine v Foy [2021] EWHC 2302 (Ch) Master Clark refused an application to rely on expert evidence that was served the day before the hearing.  The expert evidence was not relevant, not admissible and the application made far too…

NEVER MIND THE... AMENDMENTS.... HERE'S THE SEX PISTOLS: JOHNNY ROTTEN WAS TOO FAR BEHIND THE BEAT...

NEVER MIND THE… AMENDMENTS…. HERE’S THE SEX PISTOLS: JOHNNY ROTTEN WAS TOO FAR BEHIND THE BEAT…

August 23, 2021 · by gexall · in Amendment, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In  Jones & Anor v Lydon & Ors [2021] EWHC 2322 (Ch) Sir Anthony Mann refused an application for late amendment of the pleadings.  A Note explaining the nature of the case cannot be used as a substitute for a…

STATEMENTS OF CASE: A REPLY CANNOT BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

STATEMENTS OF CASE: A REPLY CANNOT BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

August 23, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In  R5 Capital Ltd v Mitheridge Capital Management LLP [2021] EWHC 2316 (Ch) Deputy Master Raeburn highlighted the fact that the rules do not allow a Reply to be, or to appear to be, contradictory to the case set out…

A JOINT STATEMENT OF EXPERTS IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COURT AND NOT A PROVING GROUND FOR THE PARTIES' RESPECTIVE CASES: "OVERLAWYERED"  REPORTS: LIMITATION AND DATE OF KNOWLEDGE:

A JOINT STATEMENT OF EXPERTS IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COURT AND NOT A PROVING GROUND FOR THE PARTIES’ RESPECTIVE CASES: “OVERLAWYERED” REPORTS: LIMITATION AND DATE OF KNOWLEDGE:

August 20, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

In the judgment today in  Aderounmu v Colvin [2021 EWHC 2293 (QB) Master Cook found that the claimant was not under a disability and the limitation period for bringing a personal injury action had expired. The Master exercised the discretion…

← Previous 1 … 59 60 61 … 147 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS, RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS (OR NOT…) AND THE COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS “WHAT IS A TRIAL?”: THE DEFINITION PROVES TO BE VERY IMPORTANT FOR THIS APPELLANT…
  • COST BITES 417: THE LIABILITY FOR COSTS OF EACH CLAIMANT WHEN A MULTI-CLAIMANT ACTION WAS DISCONTINUED: BEING PART OF SUCH AN ACTION MAY NOT BE CHEAP…
  • EXPERT WATCH 63: WHEN A DOCTOR WRITES TO THE COURT AND THE JUDGE FINDS THE INFORMATION “UNRELIABLE”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “UNNECESSARY MATERIAL, DUPLICATION AND INFORMATION OVERLOAD”: A POST FROM JULY 2016 WHICH STILL HAS ECHOES TODAY
  • EXPERT WATCH 62: ANOTHER CASE WHERE THE EXPERT DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE “BOLAM” TEST: PLUS THE DANGERS OF INSTRUCTING AN EXPERT BY A “PORTAL”

Top Posts

WHAT SHOULD A SOLICITOR DO IF A CLIENT IS PUTTING FORWARD AN ACCOUNT THAT MAY BE UNTRUE AND THEN THERE ARE "RED FLAGS"? WHEN IS THE LINE CROSSED: THE DUTIES CONSIDERED IN DETAIL
"STING OPERATIONS", SECRET AGENTS, NAIVE SOLICITORS DISCLOSING THEIR CLIENT'S PRIVILEGED INFORMATION, STRIKING OUT AND ABUSE OF PROCESS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION HIGHLIGHTS THE MAJOR RISKS OF "PRIVILEGE HUNTING"
THE RULES ARE CHANGING: ADVANCE NOTICE: GOODBYE TO THE CHANCERY DIVISION
CAN THE WAY IN WHICH A CLAIMANT HAS CONDUCTED A CASE MEAN THAT IT SHOULD NOT HAVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT: "CLEAN HANDS" AND OTHER EQUITABLE MAXIMS CONSIDERED
EXPERT WATCH 59: THE JUDGE IS CONCERNED THAT THE EXPERTS' SOURCES OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WERE NOT FULLY DISCLOSED: THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES...

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.