Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login

Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers

Browse: Page 61
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED ON APPEAL WHERE A PARTY FAILED TO PAY THE COURT FEE

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED ON APPEAL WHERE A PARTY FAILED TO PAY THE COURT FEE

August 20, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Court fees, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In  Silber v London Borough of Barnet (HOUSING – CIVIL PENALTY – case struck out by FTT for failure to pay the hearing fee – criteria for relief from sanctions) [2021] UKUT 206 (LC) the Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal…

CLAIMANT WHO FAILED TO USE THE PORTAL WAS UNREASONABLE AND HAS TO FACE THE MUSIC: FIXED COSTS APPLY

CLAIMANT WHO FAILED TO USE THE PORTAL WAS UNREASONABLE AND HAS TO FACE THE MUSIC: FIXED COSTS APPLY

August 19, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Fork handles, Members Content, Personal Injury

I am grateful to Gemma Blackburn from DWF Law for bringing my attention to the judgment of Costs Judge Haworth in Harford v Music Store Professional UK/DV247 Ltd [2021] EWHC B17 (Costs).   “I am satisfied that in this case…

"... THE JUDGE COULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHY EITHER SIDE WAS PROPOSING TO SPEND LARGE SUMS ON LITIGATION THAT APPEARED BOTH FUTILE TO BRING AND SENSELESS TO DEFEND": COURT OF APPEAL DECISION ON SECURITY FOR COSTS

“… THE JUDGE COULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHY EITHER SIDE WAS PROPOSING TO SPEND LARGE SUMS ON LITIGATION THAT APPEARED BOTH FUTILE TO BRING AND SENSELESS TO DEFEND”: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION ON SECURITY FOR COSTS

August 18, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Security for Costs

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Heathfield International LLC v Axiom Stone (London) Ltd & Anor [2021] EWCA Civ 1242 is about security for costs.  The “mysteries” as to why the action was being brought and defended, played…

JUDGE ENTITLED TO FIND A CLAIMANT WAS NOT DISHONEST: IT MAY BE MORE BENEFICIAL TO DIRECT ATTENTION TO SOLICITOR RATHER THAN THE "HAPLESS CLIENT"

JUDGE ENTITLED TO FIND A CLAIMANT WAS NOT DISHONEST: IT MAY BE MORE BENEFICIAL TO DIRECT ATTENTION TO SOLICITOR RATHER THAN THE “HAPLESS CLIENT”

August 17, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Conduct, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Personal Injury

In  Michael v I E & D Hurford Ltd (t/a Rainbow) [2021] EWHC 2318 (QB) Mrs Justice Stacey refused the defendant’s appeal in a case where the trial judge had found the claimant not to be fundamentally dishonest.  The claimant…

"I EXPECTED THAT THE LAWYERS IN THE CASE WOULD WORK CONSCIENTOUSLY WORK WITHIN THE BUDGET WHICH I HAD SET. SADLY, I SENSE, THAT THEY HAVE NOT TRIED VERY HARD TO DO SO"

“I EXPECTED THAT THE LAWYERS IN THE CASE WOULD WORK CONSCIENTOUSLY WORK WITHIN THE BUDGET WHICH I HAD SET. SADLY, I SENSE, THAT THEY HAVE NOT TRIED VERY HARD TO DO SO”

August 16, 2021 · by gexall · in Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

In Z (No.2) (Schedule 1: Further Legal Costs Funding Order; Further Interim Financial Provision) [2021] EWFC 72 Mr Justice Cobb carried out what was, essentially, a cost budgeting exercise in a family case. There are important observations about the need…

PROVING THINGS 214: CORONAVIRUS, COMPANIES AND INSOLVENCY: PETITIONER FAILS TO PROVE ITS CASE

August 16, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content

The judgment of HHJ Kelly (sitting as a judge of the High Court) in A Company, Re [2021] EWHC 2289 (Ch) concerns some intricate provisions of the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020  Ultimately, however it was a matter of…

TRIBUTE TO LORNA COLE, BARRISTER AND HEAD OF CHAMBERS: “INVINCIBLE”

August 13, 2021 · by gexall · in Members Content, Uncategorized

Lorna Cole was called to the Bar in 1951 and was head of chambers at Hull for many years, she sadly died earlier this week.  Richard Wright QC, Leader of the North-Eastern Circuit, sent out a tribute to her today…

SOLICITORS AND FUNDERS ENTITLED TO TERMINATE THEIR AGREEMENT: FORMER CLIENTS LIABLE TO PAY COSTS: WHEN LITIGATION GOES AWRY

SOLICITORS AND FUNDERS ENTITLED TO TERMINATE THEIR AGREEMENT: FORMER CLIENTS LIABLE TO PAY COSTS: WHEN LITIGATION GOES AWRY

August 13, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Conditional Fee Agreements, Members Content, Professional negligence,

The judgment of HHJ Cadwallader in Escalate Law Ltd & Anor v Kennedy & Anor [2021] EWHC 2232 (Ch) is an example of legal funders and solicitors falling out with their clients.  The  judge upheld the decision to withdraw from…

QUESTIONS TO EXPERT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUT BEFORE THE TRIAL:  THE WRITING MAY BE ON THE WALL FOR LATE CHALLENGES

QUESTIONS TO EXPERT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUT BEFORE THE TRIAL: THE WRITING MAY BE ON THE WALL FOR LATE CHALLENGES

August 12, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

For the second time in two days I am reporting on cases where judges made the point that issues relating to evidence should have been raised before trial.  Yesterday Mr Justice Zacaroli held that issues in relation to disclosure should…

PROVING THINGS 214: SONGWRITING, COPYING AND DISCLOSURE: GIVE THEM A MINIM AND THEY'LL TAKE A MILE

PROVING THINGS 214: SONGWRITING, COPYING AND DISCLOSURE: GIVE THEM A MINIM AND THEY’LL TAKE A MILE

August 11, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Disclosure, Members Content

An interesting issue as to proof and evidence arose in the decision of Mr Justice Zacaroli in Smith v Dryden & Ors [2021] EWHC 2277 (IPEC).  The claimant failed to establish that a song had been “copied”.  There are also…

LIMITATION, THE DATE OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE SECTION 33 DISCRETION: THE SINS OF THE LAWYER CANNOT NECESSARILY BE PASSED ONTO THE CLIENT

LIMITATION, THE DATE OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE SECTION 33 DISCRETION: THE SINS OF THE LAWYER CANNOT NECESSARILY BE PASSED ONTO THE CLIENT

August 11, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Limitation, Members Content

The judgment of Richard Hermer QC, sitting as a High Court Judge, in Wilkins v University Hospital North Midlands NHS Trust [2021] EWHC 2164 (QB) deals with several important elements of limitation in the context of clinical negligence. Firstly the…

MASTER WAS RIGHT TO SET ASIDE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: ANOTHER CLAIMANT'S ACTION BITES THE DUST

MASTER WAS RIGHT TO SET ASIDE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: ANOTHER CLAIMANT’S ACTION BITES THE DUST

August 9, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Webinar

The judgment of Mr Justice William Davis  in  Qatar Investment And Projects Holding Co & Anor v Phoenix Ancient Art S.A. [2021] EWHC 2243 (QB) adds to the many, many, cases on this blog that deal with the dangers relating…

INCREASES IN HOURLY RATE AMOUNTS TO "SPECIAL REASONS" IN SOLICITORS ACT ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

INCREASES IN HOURLY RATE AMOUNTS TO “SPECIAL REASONS” IN SOLICITORS ACT ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

August 6, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

In Raydens Ltd v Cole [2021] EWHC B14 (Costs) Costs Judge Leonard found that an increase in hourly rates meant that “special circumstances” established in a Solicitors Act assessment. “I do not believe that anyone in her position could reasonably…

DEFENDANT NOT LIABLE TO PAY THE COSTS OF DISPUTES OVER WHO SHOULD BE CLAIMANT'S LITIGATION FRIEND

DEFENDANT NOT LIABLE TO PAY THE COSTS OF DISPUTES OVER WHO SHOULD BE CLAIMANT’S LITIGATION FRIEND

August 6, 2021 · by gexall · in Clinical Negligence, Costs, Members Content, Personal Injury

In  HR v Aneurin Bevan University Local Health Board [2021] EWHC 2195 (Admin) Mrs Justice Foster rejected an argument that the defendant should be liable to pay the costs incurred when there was a dispute in relation to the identity…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: KEY CASES AND ISSUES 2021:  A WEBINAR OF INTEREST TO ALL LITIGATORS

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: KEY CASES AND ISSUES 2021: A WEBINAR OF INTEREST TO ALL LITIGATORS

August 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Webinar

There appears to be no end of cases where claimants (and occasionally defendants) come to grief over issues relating to service of the claim form. A knowledge of the principles, and the reasons people often get it wrong, is essential…

WHEN A DEFENDANT DOES NOT TURN UP FOR TRIAL: THE RELEVANT CRITERIA CONSIDERED

WHEN A DEFENDANT DOES NOT TURN UP FOR TRIAL: THE RELEVANT CRITERIA CONSIDERED

August 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Adjournments, Applications, Members Content

In Van Zuylen v Whiston-Dew & Anor [2021] EWHC 2219 (Ch) Mr Nicholas Thompsell, sitting as a High Court Judge, considered the relevant criteria the court applies when a party fails to attend trial.  The judgment also considers the relevant…

FATAL ACCIDENTS: DAY LONG (ONLINE) COURSE ON LAW, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: 12th NOVEMBER 2021

FATAL ACCIDENTS: DAY LONG (ONLINE) COURSE ON LAW, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: 12th NOVEMBER 2021

August 4, 2021 · by gexall · in Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Webinar

Alongside solicitor Hilary Wetherell I am presenting a day long course: Fatal Accidents: Law, Practice, Procedure and Compassion 2021.  It is an online course on the 12th November 2021.  Booking details are available here. THE COURSE This one day virtual…

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DISPLACED PART 36 RULES: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU ARE OFFERING: TROUBLE AT SEA WHEN TWO RULES COLLIDE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DISPLACED PART 36 RULES: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU ARE OFFERING: TROUBLE AT SEA WHEN TWO RULES COLLIDE

August 4, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

The judgment of Clare Ambrose (sitting as a High Court judge)  in Falcon Trident Shipping Ltd v Levant Shipping Ltd [2021] EWHC 2204 (Comm) held that a settlement agreed drafted after acceptance of a Part 36 offer displaced the provisions…

PROVING THINGS 213: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE, WITNESS EVIDENCE AND MEDICAL NOTES

August 3, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Sheard -v- Cao Tri Do [2021] EWHC 2166 (QB) HHJ Robinson, sitting as a Judge of the High Court, had to consider competing witness evidence in the context of a medical negligence action.  It is an example of the…

"ONE PAGE OUT" (BUT SOMETIMES MORE): ELECTRONIC BUNDLES GENERATE DIFFICULTIES- FAILURES COULD LEAD TO SANCTIONS

“ONE PAGE OUT” (BUT SOMETIMES MORE): ELECTRONIC BUNDLES GENERATE DIFFICULTIES- FAILURES COULD LEAD TO SANCTIONS

August 3, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Members Content

In Hodgson v Creation Consumer Finance Ltd [2021] EWHC 2167 (Comm) (29 July 2021)  HHJ Pearce, sitting as a High Court Judge, made some observations about the problems caused by the pagination of electronic bundles.  We have the familar problem…

LAWYERS AND HOLIDAYS: AVOIDING STRESS  – ADVICE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD

LAWYERS AND HOLIDAYS: AVOIDING STRESS – ADVICE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD

August 2, 2021 · by gexall · in Members Content, Well being

This is the time of year when many of us go on, and return from, holiday.  Even if people are not globe trotting a few weeks (or even days) away can lead to stress.  This is an appropriate time to…

CLAIMANTS' APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME REFUSED: AN APPLICATION AT (SIX MINUTES) AFTER THE  DEADLINE

CLAIMANTS’ APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME REFUSED: AN APPLICATION AT (SIX MINUTES) AFTER THE DEADLINE

August 2, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The judgment of Mrs Justice O’Farrell in Jalla & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Ors [2021] EWHC 2118 (TCC) shows the dangers of assuming that an extension of time will be given. The judge found that an agreement…

ANOTHER SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASE: THE COURT WILL NOT "REWRITE HISTORY":  SERVICE HAS TO TAKE PLACE ACCORDING TO THE RULES: EVEN AGAINST "PERSONS UNKNOWN"

ANOTHER SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASE: THE COURT WILL NOT “REWRITE HISTORY”: SERVICE HAS TO TAKE PLACE ACCORDING TO THE RULES: EVEN AGAINST “PERSONS UNKNOWN”

August 2, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

The judgment of Mr Justice Nicklin in London Borough of Ealing v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 2132 (QB) serves as a stark reminder that there is a duty to comply with the rules relating to service of the claim form,…

YOU CANNOT PUT A CAVEAT WHEN ACCEPTING A PART 36 OFFER: CASE UNREASONABLY LEFT THE PORTAL: THE CLAIMANT "MISUNDERSTOOD THE RULES"

YOU CANNOT PUT A CAVEAT WHEN ACCEPTING A PART 36 OFFER: CASE UNREASONABLY LEFT THE PORTAL: THE CLAIMANT “MISUNDERSTOOD THE RULES”

August 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Members Content

I am grateful to barrister James Miller for sending me a copy of the decision of Deputy Master Friston in Jimenez -v- Esure Services Limited (30th July 2021) a copy of which is available here. Jimenz -v- Esure THE CASE…

THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL FINAL REPORT ON GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES

THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL FINAL REPORT ON GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES

August 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Costs, Members Content

The Civil Justice Council has produced its final report on guideline hourly rates.  This follows a consultation process following the interim report in January 2021. THE REPORT The report is available here.   THE RECOMMENDED RATES  … Enjoying this post?…

PROVING THINGS 212: MISTAKE, TRUSTS & TAXATION: "IT IS CLEAR THAT HIS WITNESS STATEMENT WAS CONSTRUCTED WITH ONLY PASSING REFERENCE TO WHAT HIS EVIDENCE IN CHIEF WOULD BE IF CALLED TO GIVE ORAL EVIDENCE"

PROVING THINGS 212: MISTAKE, TRUSTS & TAXATION: “IT IS CLEAR THAT HIS WITNESS STATEMENT WAS CONSTRUCTED WITH ONLY PASSING REFERENCE TO WHAT HIS EVIDENCE IN CHIEF WOULD BE IF CALLED TO GIVE ORAL EVIDENCE”

July 29, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The adequacy of witness evidence was considered in detail in the judgment of Deputy Master Marsh in Dukeries Healthcare Ltd v Bay Trust International Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 2086 (Ch). It shows the danger of setting out a case…

DRESSING FOR COURT: GUIDANCE AND TWO NEW USEFUL LINKS

July 28, 2021 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Members Content

Two  posts on the “Yetanotherbloggingbarrister” blog are worth reading on the, sometimes difficult, question of dress for pupil barristers.  I provide the links here. This provides a chance to look again at guidance given more widely. Not only for pupils…

“THIS CASE SHOULD ONCE AGAIN SERVE AS A REMINDER TO LITIGANTS THAT LEAVING THE ISSUE OF A CLAIM FORM TO THE ELEVENTH HOUR OF LIMITATION IS AN EXTREMELY RISK APPROACH TO TAKE AND SHOULD BE AVOIDED AT ALL COSTS”: ISSUE AND THE ELECTRONIC WORKING SYSTEM

July 27, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Limitation, Members Content

The decision of Deputy Master Grimshaw in ABC & Ors v The London Borough of Lambeth [2021] EWHC 2057 (QB) is, I think, the first to consider the question of the date of issue in the Electronic Working System. It…

YOU CANNOT CLAIM ADDITIONAL COSTS AFTER A SECOND CNF IS SENT IN THE PORTAL PROCESS: DISTRICT JUDGE DECISION

July 26, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Fixed Costs, Members Content, RTA Protocol

I am grateful to barrister James Miller for sending me a copy of the decision of District Judge Rouin in Thandi -v- Esure Services Ltd (9th June 2021).    Thandi v Esure – Approved Judgment – 09.06.21 V1 The claimant…

THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM DOES NOT COWER IN THE SHADOWS: IT IS DIFFICULT FOR LITIGANTS TO BE ANONYMOUS: NO "PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE" HERE

THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM DOES NOT COWER IN THE SHADOWS: IT IS DIFFICULT FOR LITIGANTS TO BE ANONYMOUS: NO “PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE” HERE

July 23, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content

If you are ever asked the question as to what the similarities are between dancers at Spearmint Rhino and employees of Members of Parliament then there is only one appropriate answer. They have both applied for, and been refused, permission…

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY IN £10 MILLION CASE: A PARTY "COURTING DISASTER" HAD BROUGHT THIS SITUATION ON THEMSELVES.

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY IN £10 MILLION CASE: A PARTY “COURTING DISASTER” HAD BROUGHT THIS SITUATION ON THEMSELVES.

July 22, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Electronic service,, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

We see a classic mistake as to service of the claim form in the judgment of Mr Justice Fraser in LSREF 3 Tiger Falkirk Ltd I S.a.r.l & Anor v Paragon Building Consultancy Ltd [2021] EWHC 2063 (TCC). The claimant…

EXTENSIONS OF TIME AND THE DENTON CRITERIA: WHEN IT IS UNSATISFACTORY FOR AN APPELLANT TO GO HUNTING

EXTENSIONS OF TIME AND THE DENTON CRITERIA: WHEN IT IS UNSATISFACTORY FOR AN APPELLANT TO GO HUNTING

July 21, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In  Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor v Hughes & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1093 the Court of Appeal were, shall we say, slightly unimpressed by an argument that a judge should have applied the Denton test…

DEFENDANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW FROM AN ADMISSION: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION OF HIGH COURT JUDGE

DEFENDANT REFUSED PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW FROM AN ADMISSION: COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION OF HIGH COURT JUDGE

July 20, 2021 · by gexall · in Admissions, Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In J v A South Wales Local Authority [2021] EWCA Civ 1102 the Court of Appeal upheld an earlier decision refusing a defendant permission to resile from an admission. “There is no doubt that the checklist at paragraph 7.2 is…

COURT SETS ASIDE CONTENTIOUS BUSINESS AGREEMENT: CONTENTS WERE UNFAIR AND UNREASONABLE

COURT SETS ASIDE CONTENTIOUS BUSINESS AGREEMENT: CONTENTS WERE UNFAIR AND UNREASONABLE

July 20, 2021 · by gexall · in Costs, Members Content

In Tripipatkul v WH Lawrence Ltd (t/a WH Lawrence Solicitors) [2021] EWHC B13 (Costs) Costs Judge Brown set aside a contentious business agreement between a solicitor and their former client. “The decision in ex parte Cathcart requires the court to…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND HILLSBOROUGH: AN ACADEMIC ANALYSIS OF HOW THE EVIDENCE WAS GATHERED

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND HILLSBOROUGH: AN ACADEMIC ANALYSIS OF HOW THE EVIDENCE WAS GATHERED

July 20, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

I have written several times about the major difficulties caused by the process of taking witness statements following the Hillsborough disaster.  The process of taking statements is analysed by an academic in Hillsborough disaster: a revealing analysis of the language…

DENTON, APPLICATIONS, THE COURT OF APPEAL AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: WHEN THE COURT TELLS YOU THAT SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS ARE NEEDED IT IS A GOOD IDEA TO MAKE THEM

DENTON, APPLICATIONS, THE COURT OF APPEAL AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: WHEN THE COURT TELLS YOU THAT SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS ARE NEEDED IT IS A GOOD IDEA TO MAKE THEM

July 19, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Mahmud, R (On the Application Of) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2021] EWCA Civ 1004 the Court of Appeal sent out a reminder that the need to comply with the Civil Procedure Rules extends to the Administrative…

WHEN TWO EXPERTS ARE BETTER THAN ONE: IT MAY BE MORE ART THAN SCIENCE...

WHEN TWO EXPERTS ARE BETTER THAN ONE: IT MAY BE MORE ART THAN SCIENCE…

July 15, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

Many of the reported cases in relation to the courts and witness experts are about the judge restricting the use of experts.  In Borro Ltd & Ors v Aitken [2021] EWHC 1902 (Ch) HHJ Johns QC (sitting as a High…

FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: 76 YEAR OLD CLAIMANT SENTENCED TO 6 MONTHS IMMEDIATE IMPRISONMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT

FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY: 76 YEAR OLD CLAIMANT SENTENCED TO 6 MONTHS IMMEDIATE IMPRISONMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT

July 14, 2021 · by gexall · in Committal proceedings, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content

In One Insurance -v- Beasley (a judgment available here) a 76 year old was sentenced to six months immediate imprisonment following his dishonest pursuit of a personal injury case. “A wheelchair was hired on two occasions in order to be…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND GATHERING WITNESS EVIDENCE: THE LESSONS THAT LAWYERS MUST LEARN FROM HILLSBOROUGH: WEBINAR 19th JULY 2021

July 14, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Webinar, Witness statements

On the 19th July 2021 I am presenting a webinar that looks at the implications of the Hillsborough case from the point of view of collecting witness evidence. Booking details are available here .  NB – the webinar will be broadcast…

"FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE THAT MOST CIVIL LITIGATION DOES NOT END UP BEING ABOUT THE COSTS... LOOK AWAY NOW": COURT OF APPEAL ON NON-PARTY COSTS ORDERS

“FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE THAT MOST CIVIL LITIGATION DOES NOT END UP BEING ABOUT THE COSTS… LOOK AWAY NOW”: COURT OF APPEAL ON NON-PARTY COSTS ORDERS

July 13, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Members Content

In  Goknur Gida Maddeleri Enerji Imalet Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS v Aytacli [2021] EWCA Civ 1037 the Court of Appeal upheld a judge’s decision not to make a non-party order against a director of a litigant company.  The…

APPLYING TO HAVE JUDGMENT SET ASIDE:  BE QUICK TO BE SAFE: DELAY IN MAKING APPLICATION MEANT IT WAS "RIGHT ON THE LINE"

APPLYING TO HAVE JUDGMENT SET ASIDE: BE QUICK TO BE SAFE: DELAY IN MAKING APPLICATION MEANT IT WAS “RIGHT ON THE LINE”

July 12, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Default judgment,, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Setting aside judgment

In Mountain Ash Portfolio Ltd v Vasilyev [2021] EWHC 1853 (Comm) Stephen Houseman QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, set aside a default judgment. However this was done by the narrowest of margins, the delay in making the…

WHEN CAN A LAY WITNESS GIVE THEIR "OPINION"? SOMETHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

WHEN CAN A LAY WITNESS GIVE THEIR “OPINION”? SOMETHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

July 11, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Sir Michael Burton in Mad Atelier International BV v Manes [2021] EWHC 1899 (Comm) shows that it is essential for civil litigators to have detailed knowledge of what is “opinion” evidence and when it is allowed in a…

PLEADING A CASE WHERE "DISCREDITABLE CONDUCT" IS ALLEGED: THE DEFENDANT MUST KNOW THE CASE THEY HAVE TO MEET

PLEADING A CASE WHERE “DISCREDITABLE CONDUCT” IS ALLEGED: THE DEFENDANT MUST KNOW THE CASE THEY HAVE TO MEET

July 9, 2021 · by gexall · in Members Content, Statements of Case

The judgment of Mr Justice Bryan in Lakatamia Shipping Co Ltd v Su & Ors [2021] EWHC 1907 (Comm) could be used as a textbook for several important issues of civil procedure and civil evidence.   Here we look at that…

DEFENDANT UNSUCCESSFUL IN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PART OF CLAIMANT'S WITNESS EVIDENCE: WHEN "HYPOTHETICAL" EVIDENCE MAY BE ADMISSIBLE

DEFENDANT UNSUCCESSFUL IN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT PART OF CLAIMANT’S WITNESS EVIDENCE: WHEN “HYPOTHETICAL” EVIDENCE MAY BE ADMISSIBLE

July 9, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Sir Michael Burton in Mad Atelier International BV v Manes [2021] EWHC 1899 (Comm) is possibly the first time that Practice Direction 57AC – Trial Witness Statements in the Business and Property Courts has been considered by the…

DEALING WITH THE COUNTER-SCHEDULE AND COUNTER-ARGUMENTS IN RELATION TO DAMAGES: WEBINAR 16th JULY 2021

DEALING WITH THE COUNTER-SCHEDULE AND COUNTER-ARGUMENTS IN RELATION TO DAMAGES: WEBINAR 16th JULY 2021

July 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Courses, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

This webinar looks at the legal principles and arguments that can be used to reduce claims for personal injury damages.  It is being held on the 16th July 2021 (and available as an on-demand recording to the 16th January 2022). …

ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS, FIXED COSTS, A DECEASED CLAIMANT AND THE COURT OF APPEAL

ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS, FIXED COSTS, A DECEASED CLAIMANT AND THE COURT OF APPEAL

July 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Fixed Costs, Members Content

In the judgment today in West v Burton [2021] EWCA Civ 1005 the Court of Appeal held that a case pursued by the estate of a deceased person was not subject to the fixed costs provisions of Section III of…

"CARE MUST BE TAKEN IN ASSESSING A WITNESS WHO IS REPLYING TO QUESTIONS ASKED THROUGH AN INTERPRETER":  SOME PROBLEMS EXEMPLIFIED

“CARE MUST BE TAKEN IN ASSESSING A WITNESS WHO IS REPLYING TO QUESTIONS ASKED THROUGH AN INTERPRETER”: SOME PROBLEMS EXEMPLIFIED

July 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Some of the difficulties a court has when considering witness evidence through a translator are set out in the judgment of Deputy Judge Agnello QC in Jackson v Song [2021] EWHC 1636 (Ch).   “I have considered the evidence of…

BREXIT, APPLICATIONS AND THE LEGAL LABYRINTH: A CASE TO POINT

BREXIT, APPLICATIONS AND THE LEGAL LABYRINTH: A CASE TO POINT

July 8, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Brexit, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The legal problems caused by Brexit raised their head in the judgment of Master Clark in Shanavazi, Re [2021] EWHC 1832 (Ch).   “It will be apparent from this judgment that a relatively simple practical problem has given rise to…

COURT REFUSES PERMISSION TO ADDUCE NEW EVIDENCE AFTER DRAFT JUDGMENT WAS CIRCULATED

COURT REFUSES PERMISSION TO ADDUCE NEW EVIDENCE AFTER DRAFT JUDGMENT WAS CIRCULATED

July 6, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Karunia Holdings Ltd v Creativityetc Ltd [2021] EWHC 1864 (Ch) HHJ Halliwell considered, and refused, a claimant’s application to adduce new evidence after a draft judgment had been handed down in an application for summary judgment.   ” The…

EXPERT EVIDENCE, NECESSARY EXPERTISE AND ADMISSIBILITY: BOP-ME, MASKS AND EXPERTISE

EXPERT EVIDENCE, NECESSARY EXPERTISE AND ADMISSIBILITY: BOP-ME, MASKS AND EXPERTISE

July 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content

There is an interesting discussion of the use of expert evidence in the context of specialist proceedings in the judgment of Mr Justice Fraser in Bop-Me Ltd v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Rev 1) [2021] EWHC…

← Previous 1 … 60 61 62 … 147 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • LATE WITNESS STATEMENTS, RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS (OR NOT…) AND THE COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS “WHAT IS A TRIAL?”: THE DEFINITION PROVES TO BE VERY IMPORTANT FOR THIS APPELLANT…
  • COST BITES 417: THE LIABILITY FOR COSTS OF EACH CLAIMANT WHEN A MULTI-CLAIMANT ACTION WAS DISCONTINUED: BEING PART OF SUCH AN ACTION MAY NOT BE CHEAP…
  • EXPERT WATCH 63: WHEN A DOCTOR WRITES TO THE COURT AND THE JUDGE FINDS THE INFORMATION “UNRELIABLE”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “UNNECESSARY MATERIAL, DUPLICATION AND INFORMATION OVERLOAD”: A POST FROM JULY 2016 WHICH STILL HAS ECHOES TODAY
  • EXPERT WATCH 62: ANOTHER CASE WHERE THE EXPERT DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE “BOLAM” TEST: PLUS THE DANGERS OF INSTRUCTING AN EXPERT BY A “PORTAL”

Top Posts

WHAT SHOULD A SOLICITOR DO IF A CLIENT IS PUTTING FORWARD AN ACCOUNT THAT MAY BE UNTRUE AND THEN THERE ARE "RED FLAGS"? WHEN IS THE LINE CROSSED: THE DUTIES CONSIDERED IN DETAIL
"STING OPERATIONS", SECRET AGENTS, NAIVE SOLICITORS DISCLOSING THEIR CLIENT'S PRIVILEGED INFORMATION, STRIKING OUT AND ABUSE OF PROCESS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION HIGHLIGHTS THE MAJOR RISKS OF "PRIVILEGE HUNTING"
THE RULES ARE CHANGING: ADVANCE NOTICE: GOODBYE TO THE CHANCERY DIVISION
CAN THE WAY IN WHICH A CLAIMANT HAS CONDUCTED A CASE MEAN THAT IT SHOULD NOT HAVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT: "CLEAN HANDS" AND OTHER EQUITABLE MAXIMS CONSIDERED
EXPERT WATCH 59: THE JUDGE IS CONCERNED THAT THE EXPERTS' SOURCES OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WERE NOT FULLY DISCLOSED: THIS HAS CONSEQUENCES...

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.