DO FIXED COSTS APPLY TO PORTAL CASES ALLOCATED TO THE MULTI TRACK? A COUNTY COURT DECISION – THAT SAYS THAT THEY DO
In Quader -v- Esure Services Limited (Birmingham County Court 15th October 2015) His Honour Judge David Grant considered the issue of whether fixed costs applied to a portal case that was transferred to the Multi Track. THE CASE The judge…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: LATE SERVICE OF NOTICE OF FUNDING
Relief from sanctions following late service of the notice of funding was granted by Mr Justice Simon in Jackson -v- Thompson Solicitors (& others) [2015] EWHC 549 (QB). THE CASE The claimant had failed in an action against multiple defendants…
PERMISSION TO APPEAL CANNOT BE OPEN-ENDED: HIGH COURT DECISION
In Ghura -v- Dalal [2015] EWHC 2385 Mr Justice Norris rejected the idea that time for appealing could be open-ended or ambiguous in its scope. KEY POINTS The Court does not have power to extend time for appealing “generally”. In…
WITNESS CREDIBILITY: PROBLEM WITH DEFENDANTS' EVIDENCE
The recent posts on witness credibility have given rise to much attention. Matthew Stockwell, junior counsel for the claimant, has pointed out that the case of Pollock -v- Cahill [2015] EWHC 2260 (QB) also involves an assessment of witness evidence….
COSTS AND CONDUCT 3: THE COURT OF APPEAL AND ISSUE BASED COSTS ORDERS
This is the third case today about the issue of costs and the conduct of proceedings. It is the most complex, Smith & Nephew plc -v- ConvaTec Technologies Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 803. THE CASE The Court of Appeal allowed…
THIS "PROBLEM" WITH WITNESSES: IT IS NOT A ONE WAY STREET: DEFENDANT'S EVIDENCE NOT BELIEVED
Much attention is, rightly, paid to the actions of evidence of claimants who bring fraudulent claims or give untrue evidence. However it is important to remember that this issue with evidence is not a one way street. There are plenty…
OVERTURNING FINDING OF FACTS ON APPEAL: FINDINGS OF ABSENCE OF DISHONESTY OVERTURNED BY THE PRIVY COUNCIL
The judgment of the Privy Council in Central Bank of Ecuador and others v Conticorp SA and others [2015] UKPC 11; [2015] WLR (D) 150 is quite extraordinary. It involved the Privy Council overturning a finding of fact of the judge at first instance that…
A TRIAL WITHOUT WITNESSES: THE PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES: DUNNAGE -v- RANDALL
The Court of Appeal decision today in Dunnage -v- Randall [2015] EWCA Civ 673 is one of those seminal cases that every tort law student will have to read. Here we look at the case and the procedure. In particular…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND COSTS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: NO DOUBLE STANDARDS FOR THE GOVERNMENT
In The Queen (on the application of Bhatt) -v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 1724 (Admin) Helen Mountfield QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge) made some interesting observations in relation to the Denton principles, conduct…
TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY NOT LIABLE FOR COSTS INCURRED BEFORE ADOPTION OF PROCEEDINGS: SUPREME COURT DECISION TODAY
In a short judgment today in BPE Solicitors -v- Gabriel [2015] UKSC 39 the Supreme Court considered the question of whether a Trustee in Bankruptcy who adopts proceedings thereby becomes liable for the previous costs incurred in that action. THE…
DENTON IN THE CONTEXT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: PUBLIC INTEREST A HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT CONSIDERATION
In The Queen (on the application of Charith Missaka Wijesinghe) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 1558(Admin) HH Judge Deborah Taylor (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered the Denton principles in relation to an…
APPEALS AGAINST DECISION TO ALLOW EXPERT EVIDENCE: DEFENDANTS TOLD TO GET ON THEIR BIKE
Appeals against orders granting permission for parties to call expert witnesses are rare. It is worthwhile, therefore, reading the judgment of Mr Justice Green in Allen -v- Cornwall Council [2015] EWCA Civ 1461 (QB) with some care. THE CASE The…
ASHLEY -v- TESCO STORES: FULL TRANSCRIPT NOW AVAILABLE: CLAIMANT HAS SIX MONTHS TO SERVE ON A SCOTTISH COMPANY
The case of Ashley -v- Tesco Stores [2015] EWCA Civ 1423 has been looked at earlier in this blog. The full transcript is now available. THE JUDGMENT OF LADY JUSTICE ARDEN This appeal from the order of Patterson J dated…
PERMISSION TO APPEAL NOT NEEDED FROM JUDGE AT FIRST INSTANCE (BUT YOU SHOULD STILL ASK).
In P -v- P [2-15] EWCA Civ 447 the Court of Appeal held that it is not mandatory for a party who wishes to appeal to seek permission from the judge at first instance. THE CASE The Court of Appeal…
APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT MADE LATE IN THE DAY: APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL TO SET JUDGMENT ASIDE ALLOWED
In Priestley -v- Dunbar [2015] EWHC 987 (Ch) H.H.Judge Behrens (sitting as a judge of the High Court) overturned an earlier decision refusing to set judgment aside on the grounds of delay. THE CASE The claimant had obtained default judgment…
WITNESS CREDIBILITY AND APPEALS: A COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
In Curran -v- Collins [2015] EWCA Civ 404 the Court of Appeal considered how an appellate court should approach issues of witness credibility. It is an example of a court dealing with a witness who, the judge finds, has “convinced…
JUDGES MUST "CONTEND WITH THE CHANGING FASHIONS OF APPELLATE COURTS": ANOTHER LATE WITNESS STATEMENT; ANOTHER CASE WHERE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED
“This is yet another appeal concerning the proper application of CPR 3.9 as to relief from sanctions.” The opening words of the judgment of Mr Justice Cranston in Fouda -v- The Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark…
COURT CANNOT RE-OPEN "FINAL JUDGMENT": ISSUES RELATING TO DEFENDANT'S CAPACITY: EVESHAM –v- WERRETT CONSIDERED
In the judgment today in Eversham & Pershore Housing Association Ltd -v- Werrett [2015] EWHC 1060 (QB) Mr Justice Nicol held that the court could not re-open a decision because of later evidence in relation to the defendant’s capacity. THE…
ITS NOT WHAT THE JUDGE SAID BUT THE WAY THAT THEY SAID IT: DISCUSSIONS FROM DOWN UNDER
The Supreme Court of South Australia made some interesting observations about the interaction between the bench and the bar in Stone -v- Moore [2015] SASC 46 (24th March 2015). In particular what does the appellate court do when a complaint…
DOES THE COURT OF APPEAL NEED TO "SHOW ITS WORKINGS"? ALL KICKING OFF IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION
An interesting point of procedure arose in the decision of Mr Justice Mostyn in Rochdale Metropolitan Council -v- KW [2015] EWCOP 13. Is a Court of Appeal decision valid when it is allowed by consent and there is no reasoned…
LATE SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: EXTENSION REFUSED: REMINDER TO SERVE PROMPTLY AND PROPERLY
The case of Bellcrown Associates Ltd -v- Royal Bank of Scotland (QBC) 17/03/2015 is reported on Lawtel today*. It provides another example of the dangers of not serving a claim form properly. THE CASE The claimant was bringing an action…
EVANS -v- WOLVERHAMPTON: PART 36: SERVICE OF NOTICE TO APPEAL AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: IN THE REPORTS AGAIN
The case of Evans -v- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital Trust [2014] EWHC 3185 (QB) has been examined before in this blog. It was the case where the defendant made an ex parte application for permission to withdraw a Part 36…
THE COURT OF APPEAL CAN RE-OPEN A DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION TO APPEAL WHEN IT IS ALLEGED THE JUDGMENT WAS OBTAINED BY FRAUD
In Bishop -v- Chhokar [2015] EWCA Civ 24 the Court of Appeal decided that it had jurisdiction to re-open an order refusing permission to appeal when it was alleged that a judgment was obtained by fraud. THE CASE The respondent…
SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: E-MAILING A COPY IS NOT GOOD SERVICE (AND WON'T BE EXCUSED)
Service of the claim form raises its head for the second time in two days. In Dunbar Assets Plc -v- BCP Premier Limited [2014] EWHC 10 (Ch) Mr John Baldwin QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge) overturned an order that…
THE NEW PART 36: PART 10: PULLING IT ALL TOGETHER: 18 KEY POINTS
This post provides a summary of the changes to Part 36 and then considers the practical implications of the new rules, including the implications for on-going litigation. There are links to the relevant posts on the issue and a summary…
NOMINAL DAMAGES AWARD LEADS TO NO COSTS AT TRIAL & 25% OF COSTS ON APPEAL
In Walker -v- the Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2014] EWCA Civ 897 the Court of Appeal considered the appropriate costs award when a claimant succeeded on appeal but the appellate court held that he should only recover…
CASE NOT STRUCK OUT BECAUSE OF A FAILURE TO FILE TRIAL BUNDLE & PAY COURT FEES
One of the most read posts on this blog was, in the middle of the Mitchell Madness period, when a judge struck out an action because the trial bundle had been lodged late. This issue was considered by Hickinbottom J…
EXTENSIONS OF TIME: RESPONDENT'S NOTICES AND THE "MITCHELL" PRINCIPLES & THE "SERIOUSNESS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE BREACH"
The question of the general applicability, and the application, of “Mitchell” principles was considered today by the Court of Appeal in Altomart Ltd -v- Salford Estates (No 2) Limited [2014] EWHC 1408. The court considered the principles to be applied…
COSTS ASSESSED AT NIL WHEN SOLICITOR FAILED TO MAKE PROPER INVESTIGATIONS INTO CLIENT'S FUNDING
The case of McDaniel & Co -v- Clark (QBD Hickinbottom J 15/10/14) contains a clear warning that solicitors must make proper enquiries about funding at a very early stage. (This post is based on the Lawtel note of the judgment…
MORE ON CHILD CLAIMANTS AND THE RECOVERY OF SUCCESS FEES: AN EXTREMELY HELPFUL NOTE FROM THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS
The post yesterday on children and success fees got a lot of attention. I am grateful to Daniel Higgins head of costs at Gavin Edmonson Solicitors Ltd who was involved in that appeal. His note (reproduced with his permission below)…
COSTS IN THE SUPREME COURT: NEGLIGENT SOLICITORS ORDERED TO PAY COSTS OF BOTH SIDES
What costs order should the Supreme Court make when an appellant succeeds in establishing that wills are valid despite the fact that they have been improperly executed because of negligence on the part of a solicitor? A pragmatic view was…
CAN YOU GET AN ORDER FOR QOCS TO APPLY ON AN APPEAL? CPR 59.2A CONSIDERED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL
In JE -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 192 the Court of Appeal considered whether a QUOCs type order could be made in the Court of Appeal. The Court also emphasised the importance of prompt…
E-BUNDLES COMING TO THE SUPREME COURT AND PRIVY COUNCIL VERY, VERY SOON
The Supreme Court has issued guidance on the use of electronic bundles which will be mandatory for a trial period. Parties given permission to appeal in the Supreme Court and Privy Council after the 1st October 2014 will be expected…
FAILURE TO SERVE NOTICE OF AMENDED CFA DETAILS IS NOT A SERIOUS OR SIGNIFICANT BREACH: HIGH COURT DECISION CONSIDERED IN DETAIL
The High Court decision in Ultimate Products Ltd -v- Wooley [2014] EWHC 2706 (Ch) provides further guidance as to what the courts are likely to consider “serious or significant” breaches. The High Court judge upheld the decision of the Master…
DENTON PRINCIPLES AND EXTENDING TIME FOR APPEALING: COURT OF APPEAL OBSERVATIONS
The issue of whether the “Denton” principles applied to applications for permission to appeal out of time were considered briefly by the Court of Appeal in Hart -v- Burbridge [2014] EWCA Civ 992 THE ISSUES The appellants appealed out of…
DENTON APPLIED IN THE TAX TRIBUNAL: NO PERMISSION TO APPEAL THREE YEARS LATE
The Mitchell and Denton cases were reviewed by Judge John Brooks in Meah -v- The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 708 (TC). The proposed appellant was three years late. The refusal of permission to appeal out of…
WHAT CAN THE DEFENDANT ARGUE ABOUT DAMAGES AFTER A DEFAULT JUDGMENT 2: A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE
We have looked before at the question of what a defendant can argue in relation to damages after a judgment has been entered. A case reported today examines this issue in relation to judgment in a clinical negligence action. SYMES -V-…
POST DENTON RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED: "UNREASONABLE" DEFENDANT ORDERED TO PAY COSTS
I am grateful to Ashley Pratt of St James Chambers for his note of the decision of Mr Justice King in Johnson -v- Bourne Leisure on the 21st July 2014. King J granted relief from sanctions and allowed an appeal from the…
"HISTORIC" SANCTIONS DECISIONS: ARE YOU GOING TO APPLY TO APPEAL OUT OF TIME
In Denton -v- White [2014] EWCA Civ 906. the Court of Appeal stated that we think that the judgment in Mitchell has been misunderstood and is being misapplied by some courts. It is clear that it needs to be clarified and amplified in…
SANCTIONS HEARING 4: DOES DECADENT VAPOURS LEAVE A PLEASANT SMELL?
The second substantive decision was Decadent Vapours. Here the Court of Appeal overturned a refusal to grant relief from sanctions and the claimant’s case was allowed to proceed. THE FACTS The claimant failed to make payments of fees by the…
SANCTIONS JUDGMENT: THE KEY POINTS (1): STAGES 1 AND 2 OF CONSIDERATIONS IN RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPLICATIONS
The history and arguments in relation to the Court of Appeal hearings on sanctions have been fully recorded on this blog. In the judgment given today there are a number of Key points. MITCHELL HAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF CRITICISM…
DATE SET FOR JUDGMENTS ON COURT OF APPEAL SANCTIONS HEARINGS
Judgment in the three recent cases where the Court of Appeal reviewed the application of the Mitchell criteria is to be given in in Court 71 in the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday 4th July at 2pm. TO SEE THE ARGUMENTS…
ALLOCATION BETWEEN THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK AND THE FAST TRACK: WHAT IS MEANT BY "ANY AMOUNT NOT IN DISPUTE"?
In the case of Akhtar -v- Boland [2014] EWCA Civ 872 the Court of Appeal gave guidance on CPR 26 and the matters to be considered when a determination is made as to allocation between the Fast Track and the…
NO RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AFTER APPELLANT FAILED TO FILE TRANSCRIPTS ON TIME.
In Patterson -v- Spencer [2014] EWHC 1878 (Ch) Henry Carr QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) refused an appellant’s application for relief from sanctions after she failed to file transcripts of the initial hearing. THE FACTS One of the defendants,…
ANOTHER CASE WHERE PARTY REFUSED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENT
The case of Swinden -v- Grima (Nicol J) 18/06/2014 is briefly reported on Lawtel (20th June). It is another example of the court refusing permission to serve witness statements late. THE FACTS The defendant served a witness statement on the…
COURT OF APPEAL SANCTIONS HEARING: SUBMISSIONS IN UTILISE -V- DAVIES
The final tranche of the notes taking at the hearing of the sanctions cases yesterday. The case of Utilise -v- Davies. Discussion of the first instance decision can be found in this blog as can a link to the transcript….
SANCTIONS CASE TODAY: SUBMISSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS FROM THE LAW SOCIETY AND BAR COUNCIL
The Bar Council and the Law Society were invited to make submissions at the sanctions hearings in the Court of Appeal today. The discussions between the Bar and the Bench make fascinating reading. (Mr Holland QC for both the Bar…
SANCTIONS HEARING TODAY: NOTES OF THE HEARING IN DECADENT VAPOURS
DECADENT VAPOURS LIMITED V BEVAN Heard by the Court of Appeal on 16th June 2014 (Lord Justice Dyson MR) (Lord Justice Jackson) (Lord Justice Vos) APPELLANT/CLAIMANT’S SUBMISSION In the present case the appellant appeals a decision to refuse relief from…
COURT OF APPEAL HEARING TODAY: DETAILED NOTE OF SUBMISSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS AT THE COURT
The Court of Appeal hearing on sanctions after Mitchell goes on. Here I outline, in detail, the submissions and discussions in Denton. Other cases will follow. DENTON AND OTHERS V T H WHITE LIMITED Heard by the Court of…
You must be logged in to post a comment.