Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Appeals » Page 21

EVIDENCE, PLEADINGS, RE-OPENING CASES AND THE HIGH DUTY OF CARE OWED AT ORAL APPLICATIONS TO APPLY FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL

April 20, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

This appears to be a day for cases relating to local authorities, disrepair and pleading points. In Uddin -v- London Borough of Southwark [2015] EWCA Civ 369 the Court of Appeal considered several issues relating to evidence, pleadings and the…

JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE MADE COSTS ORDER WHICH WIPED OUT CLAIMANT'S DAMAGES: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY

April 20, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content

In Begum -v- Birmingham City Council [2015] EWCA Civ 386 the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal by a claimant where the decision on costs at first instance effectively deprived her of damages. THE CASE The issue is succinctly summarised…

ASSESSING THE EVIDENCE ON A SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION: CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RAW MATERIAL IS NECESSARY

March 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Calland -v- Financial Conduct Authority [2015] EWCA Civ 192 the Court of Appeal set out important principles to be considered when the court is considering an application for summary judgment. THE CASE The claimant brought an action under the…

IF YOU WANT A STAY PENDING APPEAL MAKE FULL AND TOTAL DISCLOSURE

March 8, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

In Goldsmith -v- O’Brien [2015] EWHC 510 (Ch) Judge Purle QC refused an application for a stay pending appeal. The case is an important reminder of the burden on a party seeking a stay pending appeal. THE CASE The claimant…

WHEN BUNDLES & SANCTIONS COLLIDE: DAVIS -v- RAJA: FAILURE TO FILE APPEAL BUNDLE LEADS TO APPEAL BEING STRUCK OUT

March 6, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Davis Solicitors LLP -v- Raja [2015] EWHC 519 (QB) Mr Justice Supperstone refused the claimant relief from sanctions following a failure to comply with directions on appeal in relation to the filing of a bundle. There are important practical…

THE COURT OF APPEAL CAN RE-OPEN A DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION TO APPEAL WHEN IT IS ALLEGED THE JUDGMENT WAS OBTAINED BY FRAUD

February 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

In Bishop -v- Chhokar [2015] EWCA Civ 24 the Court of Appeal decided that it had jurisdiction to re-open an order refusing permission to appeal when it was alleged that a judgment was obtained by fraud. THE CASE The respondent…

APPEALING COSTS BUDGETS: THE RELEVANT CRITERIA CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

January 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

The decision of H H Judge Freedman in Havenga -v- Gateshead NHS Foundation Trust [2014] EWHC B25(QB) demonstrates how difficult it is for a party to appeal a costs budget. THE CASE The claimant was bringing a claim for hemiplegic…

THE NEW PART 36: PART 9: HOW IT REFLECTS AND CHANGES THE EXISTING CASE LAW

January 4, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

This is the 9th in the series on the new Part 36. Here we deal with the relevant case law which may be changed by the new rules. THE EXPLANATORY TEXT Rule changes are usually accompanied by helpful explanatory notes….

EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO APPEAL: MITCHELL AND DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLY

December 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In a combined decision in three cases heard today*  [2014] EWCA Civ 1633 the Court of Appeal set out important guidance in relation to applications to appeal out of time. Practitioners must be aware of the time limit for appeals,…

MORE ABOUT QOCS: CAN THEY APPLY ON APPEAL IF THE CLAIMANT HAD A PRE-APRIL 2013 CFA?

November 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

An earlier post on the risks posed by the transitional provisions of QOCS led to several comments. One of those comments was the question whether you can get QOCS protection on appeal if the original CFA did not cover appeals….

ROUTE OF APPEAL FOR AN UNALLOCATED CASE: LIE -v- MOHILE

November 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Lie -v- Mohile [2014] EWHC 3709 (Ch) Mr Justice David Richards considered an argument that an appeal in an action that had not been allocated should be appealed to the Court of Appeal. THE ACTION This was a partnership…

SHOULD THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS BE IN PUBLIC OR IN PRIVATE? WHEN IS LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE WAIVED?

October 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Disclosure, Members Content

In Eurasian Natural Resources Ltd -v- Dechert LLP [2014] EWHC 3389 Mr Justice Roth addressed the issue of whether an assessment of solicitor and own client costs should be in private or in public. The judgment also considers important issues…

APPEALS: STAY OF EXECUTION AND CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY APPELLATE COURT: THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES

August 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The fact that an appeal is made, or permission to appeal is granted, does not automatically grant a stay of execution.  The appellant has to apply for a stay and the court can grant conditions.  The law and principles governing…

← Previous 1 … 20 21

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • “NEW” EVIDENCE AND A SECOND APPLICATION DOES NOT GIVE RISE TO A SECOND CHANCE: ABUSE OF PROCESS LEADS TO STRIKE OUT
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 102: THE CLAIMANTS FAILURE TO PLEAD A COUNTERFACTUAL PROPERLY MEANS THE PARTICULARS NEED SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: INTERMEDIARIES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: DEFENDANT WITH ADHD ENTITLED TO ASSISTANCE WHEN GIVING EVIDENCE, BUT NOT THROUGHOUT THE TRIAL
  • WHAT IS TO BE DONE WITH LITIGANTS WHO CAN’T KEEP SECRETS (2): EMBARGOED JUDGMENTS: TEN KEY POINTS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR HOW A LETTER TO THE CLIENT SHOULD BE DRAFTED
  • ANOTHER CASE ON BREACH OF A JUDGMENT EMBARGO: WHAT IS TO BE DONE WITH LITIGANTS WHO CAN’T KEEP SECRETS (1)?

Top Posts

COST BITES 447: “THESE SUMS ARE ASTONISHING”: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS £2 MILLION BRIEF FEE AND COSTS OF A FOUR-DAY APPEAL (AND IS NOT TOO IMPRESSED)
DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU COULD BE MADE BANKRUPT (OSTENSIBLY ON YOUR OWN APPLICATION), NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT - AND THEN HAVE TO PAY THE TRUSTEE'S COSTS? THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING KEY EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT
COST BITES 448: PART 36 AND FIXED COSTS: "VERY LATE" ACCEPTANCE OF A DEFENDANT'S OFFER LEADS TO THE CLAIMANT RECOVERING NO COSTS AT ALL
SERVICE POINTS 57: PRESENCE IN THE JURISDICTION, A LAST KNOWN ADDRESS AND THE COST OF GETTING IT WRONG: UNSUCCESFUL CLAIMANT FACES A COSTS BILL OF £500,000...
"LITIGATION SHOULD BE CONDUCTED BY APPLICATIONS AND ORDERS": "THESE EPISTOLARY COMMUNICATIONS WERE LESS THAN SATISFACTORY..."

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.