Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Avoiding negligence claims » Page 5
COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS "BROUGHT FOR COLLATERAL PURPOSES"  DISMISSED: NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE ISSUED AGAINST THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS: WHY THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS STRATEGY

COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS “BROUGHT FOR COLLATERAL PURPOSES” DISMISSED: NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE ISSUED AGAINST THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS: WHY THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS STRATEGY

July 8, 2025 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Conduct, Members Content, Wasted Costs

There are many ways in which a litigant, dissatisfied with a judgment of the court can respond. They can  apply to set the judgment aside; they can appeal; they can issue fresh proceedings attempting to argue that the action was…

A QUICK POINT ABOUT  AMENDING PLEADINGS: MAKE A FORMAL APPLICATION TO AMEND AND HAVE THE PROPOSED AMENDED PLEADINGS TO HAND: THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION CONSIDERED

A QUICK POINT ABOUT AMENDING PLEADINGS: MAKE A FORMAL APPLICATION TO AMEND AND HAVE THE PROPOSED AMENDED PLEADINGS TO HAND: THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION CONSIDERED

July 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case

The  post earlier today on the striking out of pleadings contained observations about the need for a party, seeking relief from sanctions on the grounds that it should be able to amend its pleadings, having those amended pleadings to hand…

AVOIDING PROBLEMS IN CIVIL LITIGATION 1: HOW DOES ANYBODY MISS A LIMITATION PERIOD?

AVOIDING PROBLEMS IN CIVIL LITIGATION 1: HOW DOES ANYBODY MISS A LIMITATION PERIOD?

July 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Limitation, Members Content

This is the first in the promised series about avoiding problems in civil litigation. The most obvious place to start is with limitation issues.   These sometimes prove particularly problematic for personal injury and clinical negligence lawyers. However there is no…

WHEN HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF AS TRAGEDY & FARCE: GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS, MAKING WITNESS STATEMENTS AND THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF

WHEN HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF AS TRAGEDY & FARCE: GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS, MAKING WITNESS STATEMENTS AND THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF

July 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

The post earlier today on the need for MI5 operatives to give the source of their information and belief has a ring of “intrigue” about it. James Bond, we now know, cannot simply declaim something to be true. However, as…

CLAIMANT COMES TO GRIEF BECAUSE OF A WHOLLY SELF-IMPOSED PROBLEM: SUBSTITUTING A DEFENDANT WHEN THE ACTION HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED - LEADS TO MAJOR PROBLEMS

CLAIMANT COMES TO GRIEF BECAUSE OF A WHOLLY SELF-IMPOSED PROBLEM: SUBSTITUTING A DEFENDANT WHEN THE ACTION HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED – LEADS TO MAJOR PROBLEMS

July 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There have been some interesting cases on this site recently relating to the substitution of parties. However none of them are as peculiar as the case we are looking at here – where the claimant’s problems were primarily self-inflicted. The…

WITNESS STATEMENTS DRAFTED WITH CARELESSNESS AND WITHOUT APPRECIATION OF THEIR SIGNIFICANCE: "A FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE AND STATUS OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE"

WITNESS STATEMENTS DRAFTED WITH CARELESSNESS AND WITHOUT APPRECIATION OF THEIR SIGNIFICANCE: “A FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE AND STATUS OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE”

July 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The preparation of witness statements is an essential part of the stock in trade for most litigators.  It is surprising how often statements are ill prepared, they are a regular feature of this site. We see examples here when the…

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS 2: HOW TO CALCULATE LOSSES TO A SOLICITOR WHEN OTHERS HAVE DONE THE WORK BADLY

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS 2: HOW TO CALCULATE LOSSES TO A SOLICITOR WHEN OTHERS HAVE DONE THE WORK BADLY

July 1, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Professional negligence,

Here we look at the assessment of damages in a professional negligence/breach of contract case.  The facts are unusual in that damages were assessed in a case where a solicitor had counterclaimed for losses due to inadequate work done by…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 21: SHOULD A PARTY BE GIVEN PERMISION TO AMEND AT A LATE STAGE? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 21: SHOULD A PARTY BE GIVEN PERMISION TO AMEND AT A LATE STAGE? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

June 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

There are so many judgments concerning late applications to amend pleadings that, often, I decide not to write about them. There are applications to amend that are late, very late,  very, very late or “door of the court” late. The…

FURTHER UPDATES TO HMCTS GUIDANCE ON USING THE DAMAGES CLAIM PORTAL: RAISING QUERIES WITHIN SYSTEM; INFORMING THE PORTAL OF SETTLEMENT AND PARTIAL DISCONTINUANCE (NOT EXCITING, BUT IMPORTANT...)

FURTHER UPDATES TO HMCTS GUIDANCE ON USING THE DAMAGES CLAIM PORTAL: RAISING QUERIES WITHIN SYSTEM; INFORMING THE PORTAL OF SETTLEMENT AND PARTIAL DISCONTINUANCE (NOT EXCITING, BUT IMPORTANT…)

June 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

A  few days (sometimes even a day)  can be a long time in civil procedure. I wrote about the updated Guidance to the Damages Claim Portal at the end of last week.  Today I am writing to tell you it…

URGENT MESSAGE FROM H M COURTS AND TRIBUNAL SERVICE THIS MORNING: HMCTS PLATFORM IS STOPPING USERS FROM UPLOADING DOCUMENTS: WHAT TO DO IF UPLOADING IS URGENT

URGENT MESSAGE FROM H M COURTS AND TRIBUNAL SERVICE THIS MORNING: HMCTS PLATFORM IS STOPPING USERS FROM UPLOADING DOCUMENTS: WHAT TO DO IF UPLOADING IS URGENT

June 25, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

For those who have missed the email from HMCTS it is important to note that the HMCTS platform is not working at the moment. The email from HMCTS below makes practical suggestions as to what should be done if uploading…

THE WRONGFUL SHARING OF EMBARGOED JUDGMENTS: "A WARNING TO ALL SOLICITORS":  ANOTHER LAYER OF RESPONSIBILITY AND ISSUES TO CONSIDER

THE WRONGFUL SHARING OF EMBARGOED JUDGMENTS: “A WARNING TO ALL SOLICITORS”: ANOTHER LAYER OF RESPONSIBILITY AND ISSUES TO CONSIDER

June 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Cases relating to the wrongful sharing or disclosure of embargoed judgment have become a surprisingly common feature of litigation in recent times.  Here we look at another High Court decision where this has happened. The judge states that there are…

FATAL CLAIMS: ENSURING EVERYTHING GOES RIGHT: WEBINAR 27th JUNE 2025

FATAL CLAIMS: ENSURING EVERYTHING GOES RIGHT: WEBINAR 27th JUNE 2025

June 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fatal Accidents, Webinar, Witness statements

We have had an example earlier this month of things going badly wrong in a fatal claim, that led to a wasted costs order against the solicitors. This webinar  looks at the potential problem areas of fatal accident litigation and…

NO RELIEF FOR CLAIMANTS WHO SERVED THE CLAIM FORM LATE:  TAKING A POINT AS TO SERVICE IS NOT "PLAYING TECHNICAL GAMES"

NO RELIEF FOR CLAIMANTS WHO SERVED THE CLAIM FORM LATE: TAKING A POINT AS TO SERVICE IS NOT “PLAYING TECHNICAL GAMES”

June 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

It may be possible for a month to go by without a mis-service of the claim form issue arising in the courts, but it is not this month.  We have here a case with the familiar litany of waiting to…

ANOTHER CASE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND "HALLUCINATED CASES": PLUS THERE MAY BE "MISCHIEF" IN THE BACKGROUND

ANOTHER CASE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND “HALLUCINATED CASES”: PLUS THERE MAY BE “MISCHIEF” IN THE BACKGROUND

June 19, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

A few weeks ago I was cagey in reporting a case about AI generated false authorities because I could not believe any lawyer could do this and was wary of the accuracy (indeed authenticity)  of the report. Today I am…

WHEN QOCS DOES NOT APPLY TO THE WHOLE OF A CLAIM: WHAT PERECENTAGE SHOULD THE CLAIMANTS PAY: THE MATTER CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

WHEN QOCS DOES NOT APPLY TO THE WHOLE OF A CLAIM: WHAT PERECENTAGE SHOULD THE CLAIMANTS PAY: THE MATTER CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

June 13, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Costs, Members Content, Personal Injury, QOCS

For the second time today we are looking at the rules relating to Qualified one way costs shifting (QOCS) and its exceptions.  Here the defendant had spent £2 million successfully defending a claim, only part of that action was a…

COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDER ISSUES OF KNOWLEDGE, SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM AND "LAST KNOWN ADDRESS": THINGS DO NOT GO WELL FOR THE CLAIMANT

COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDER ISSUES OF KNOWLEDGE, SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM AND “LAST KNOWN ADDRESS”: THINGS DO NOT GO WELL FOR THE CLAIMANT

June 11, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Setting aside judgment

Problems occur when a claimant fails to take appropriate steps to ensure that the defendant is in fact living at the address where a claim form has served.  This was the issue considered by the Court of Appeal today.  The…

"ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE" ON TRIAL: WHEN QUESTIONED CHAT GPT WILL TELL YOU ITS MADE THINGS UP: THIS IS "A HALLUCINATION RATHER THAN A REAL LEGAL AUTHORITY"

“ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE” ON TRIAL: WHEN QUESTIONED CHAT GPT WILL TELL YOU ITS MADE THINGS UP: THIS IS “A HALLUCINATION RATHER THAN A REAL LEGAL AUTHORITY”

June 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

Artificial Intelligence and legal “research” has been very much in the news of late.  I am grateful to my colleague Steven Turner for sending me an example where, upon being questioned, Chat GPT readily conceded that a case it had…

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 3: THE PROBLEMS, THE GUIDANCE AND THE PENALTIES: PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE HAS A MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT...

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 3: THE PROBLEMS, THE GUIDANCE AND THE PENALTIES: PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE HAS A MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT…

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

We are returning to (and not for the last time) to the Divisional Court judgment in relation to the citation of false authorities due to the use of Artificial Intelligence. The Court reviews the dangers, the guidance and the sanctions…

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 2: A LAWYER IS NOT ENTITLED TO RELY ON THEIR LAY CLIENT FOR THE ACCURACY OF CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY

CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 2: A LAWYER IS NOT ENTITLED TO RELY ON THEIR LAY CLIENT FOR THE ACCURACY OF CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Conduct, Members Content

We are continuing with the examination of the Court’s judgment in relation to cases where false authorities have been cited as a result of a reliance on false authorities, generated by artificial intelligence.   Here we have a case where the…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS "NOT PURSUED"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS “NOT PURSUED”

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

This series is giving rise to more cases than I initially thought.  Here we look at an example of a claimant wishing to pursue a specific line of argument but having to accept that it was not pleaded and that…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 103: THE STANDARD FORM FOR PART 36 OFFERS

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 103: THE STANDARD FORM FOR PART 36 OFFERS

June 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

Yesterday I gave a webinar about Part 36, this will shortly be available on YouTube.  The webinar reviews cases over the past 12 months. One of the points being considered was the arguments in Henderson & Jones Ltd v Salica Investments…

THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEMPORANEOUS ATTENDANCE NOTES EXAMINED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (BUT A DIFFERENT DIVISION TO THE ONE WE USUALLY LOOK AT)

THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEMPORANEOUS ATTENDANCE NOTES EXAMINED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (BUT A DIFFERENT DIVISION TO THE ONE WE USUALLY LOOK AT)

May 21, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content

Today we are taking a rare trip into the criminal courts, the Court of Appeal Criminal Division. However we are looking at an issue that affects most, if not all, lawyers.  A client can attempt to blame their lawyer for…

COST BITES 239: HOW MUCH NEEDS TO BE EXPLAINED TO A CLIENT ENTERING INTO A CFA?

COST BITES 239: HOW MUCH NEEDS TO BE EXPLAINED TO A CLIENT ENTERING INTO A CFA?

May 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Conditional Fee Agreements, Costs, Members Content

We will, for the next few posts in this series, be working our way through one case. We have already looked at the judge’s observations in relation to the claimants’ witness statements.  We now consider the issue of how much…

AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: PROTECTING THE CLIENT AND PROTECTING YOURSELF: WEBINAR 29th MAY 2025

AVOIDING UNDERSETTLEMENT: PROTECTING THE CLIENT AND PROTECTING YOURSELF: WEBINAR 29th MAY 2025

May 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Expert evidence, Members Content, Personal Injury, Professional negligence,

“We go back through your claim in fine detail and if we find that your previous solicitor wasn’t thorough enough and your claim was mishandled, we’ll squeeze out all the compensation that you’re entitled to, getting you more money, and…

THE JUDGE'S DECISION TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS TO A DEFENDANT WAS APPROPRIATE: SOME WORDS AS TO HOW PEREMPTORY ORDERS SHOULD BE DRAFTED.

THE JUDGE’S DECISION TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS TO A DEFENDANT WAS APPROPRIATE: SOME WORDS AS TO HOW PEREMPTORY ORDERS SHOULD BE DRAFTED.

May 14, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Today we are looking at a case where the Court of Appeal upheld a decision granting a defendant relief from sanctions.  However this is a case of “two halves” in that the claimant had a more favourable decision in relation…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 102: HOW NOT TO WRITE A LEGAL LETTER (2): SOME EXAMPLES - THREATENING TO SUBJECT YOUR OPPONENT TO THE "LEGAL EQUIVALENT OF A PROCTOLOGY EXAM"

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 102: HOW NOT TO WRITE A LEGAL LETTER (2): SOME EXAMPLES – THREATENING TO SUBJECT YOUR OPPONENT TO THE “LEGAL EQUIVALENT OF A PROCTOLOGY EXAM”

May 13, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

We are continuing with this back to basics series with some more examples of how not to write legal correspondence.   We are looking at an (extreme) example, some guidance from the SRA and then the principles considered in more recent cases….

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 101: HOW NOT TO WRITE A LEGAL LETTER : DIMISSING CRUCIAL POINTS AS "COSMETIC" ERRORS LEADS TO REFERRAL TO THE SRA

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 101: HOW NOT TO WRITE A LEGAL LETTER : DIMISSING CRUCIAL POINTS AS “COSMETIC” ERRORS LEADS TO REFERRAL TO THE SRA

May 12, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

There has not been a post in this series for some time.    There was one case last week that made me decide to restart the series. It is not difficult to guess which case caused me concern.     …

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM UNDER THE ELECTRONIC PILOT: SERVICE  BY EMAIL OF AN ELECTRONICALLY SEALED COPY OF THE CLAIM FORM IS GOOD SERVICE

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM UNDER THE ELECTRONIC PILOT: SERVICE BY EMAIL OF AN ELECTRONICALLY SEALED COPY OF THE CLAIM FORM IS GOOD SERVICE

May 12, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

CPR PD510 provides for the electronic issue of a claim form.   The claim form will be sealed electronically.  What are the consequences for service of the claim form when service takes place by email? This issue was considered (albeit on…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND FINDINGS OF DISHONESTY BY AN EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL:  EDMUND BURKE CITED "YOUR REPRESENTATIVE OWES YOU, NOT HIS INDUSTRY ONLY, BUT HIS JUDGEMENT: AND HE BETRAYS YOU INSTEAD OF SERVING YOU IF HE SACRIFIES IT TO YOUR OPINION"

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND FINDINGS OF DISHONESTY BY AN EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL: EDMUND BURKE CITED “YOUR REPRESENTATIVE OWES YOU, NOT HIS INDUSTRY ONLY, BUT HIS JUDGEMENT: AND HE BETRAYS YOU INSTEAD OF SERVING YOU IF HE SACRIFIES IT TO YOUR OPINION”

May 8, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

It is rare for this blog to look at Employment Tribunal decisions.  However examining the drafting of witness statements is part of its everyday fare.  Here we look at  a decision where the Tribunal was certain that witness statements had…

COST BITES 237: "THROUGHOUT HISTORY, LAWYERS HAVE HAD A BAD REPUTATION": COMMONSENSE AND PROPORTIONALITY CONSIDERED IN THE FAMILY COURTS

COST BITES 237: “THROUGHOUT HISTORY, LAWYERS HAVE HAD A BAD REPUTATION”: COMMONSENSE AND PROPORTIONALITY CONSIDERED IN THE FAMILY COURTS

May 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Proportionality

Why spend £13,000 to recover a remedy that will only be worth £1,500? That is the issue considered by Deputy District Judge Hodgson [Professor David Hodson OBE KC (Hons)].  An application was made late. The gain to the applicant was…

AVOIDING PROBLEMS WITH CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: A WEBINAR (& CHECKLIST): 14th MAY 2025

AVOIDING PROBLEMS WITH CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: A WEBINAR (& CHECKLIST): 14th MAY 2025

May 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Clinical Negligence, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

There are many ways in which a court can approach a claim for loss of earnings.  There are as many ways in which a claim for loss of earnings can go wrong. In recent weeks I have written about cases…

COURT REFUSES DEFENDANT SOLICITORS APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: THE ONGOING CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO SERVE A CLAIM FORM PROMPTLY

COURT REFUSES DEFENDANT SOLICITORS APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: THE ONGOING CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO SERVE A CLAIM FORM PROMPTLY

May 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Summary judgment

The case we are looking at today involves the consequences, for the solicitors, of failing to serve a claim form. In an earlier case extensions of time for service of a claim form were set aside.   The client instructed new…

DOES AN  ELECTRONICALLY ISSUED AND SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED CLAIM FORM REQUIRED RE-SEALING AND FILING PRIOR TO SERVICE? AN IMPORTANT ISSUE CONSIDERED

DOES AN ELECTRONICALLY ISSUED AND SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED CLAIM FORM REQUIRED RE-SEALING AND FILING PRIOR TO SERVICE? AN IMPORTANT ISSUE CONSIDERED

May 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form

If a claimant serves a “amended” claim form that has not been resealed does that amount to good service? That issue was considered in the case we are considering today.  The result is of considerable practical significance. However it pays…

ANOTHER CASE OF SOMEONE BREACHING THE EMBARGO ON A DRAFT JUDGMENT: THE DRAFT SHOULD NOT BE HANDED OVER THE THE LAWYER'S MARKETING DEPARTMENT

ANOTHER CASE OF SOMEONE BREACHING THE EMBARGO ON A DRAFT JUDGMENT: THE DRAFT SHOULD NOT BE HANDED OVER THE THE LAWYER’S MARKETING DEPARTMENT

April 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

It is difficult to believe that  cases about  lawyers accidently breaching a judgment embargo still happen.  However the reports keep coming.  Prominent firms of solicitors, and barristers’ chambers have, over the years fallen foul of the rules. In particular a…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AFTER BREACHING A PEREMPTORY ORDER AND FAILING TO PLEAD A CASE PROPERLY: CLAIMANT ALLOWED TO CONTINUE (IN PART)

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AFTER BREACHING A PEREMPTORY ORDER AND FAILING TO PLEAD A CASE PROPERLY: CLAIMANT ALLOWED TO CONTINUE (IN PART)

April 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case

We are looking again at the judgment in  Michele Carrington v American International Group UK Limited [2025] EWHC 1010 (TCC).  This time in relation to the issue of relief from sanctions.  The claimant had failed to comply with a peremptory order  to…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 7: "THE CLAIMANT AND WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO PLEAD SUCH A CLAIM IN BROAD AND VAGUE TERMS": A CLAIMANT HAS TO PLEAD HOW THE ALLEGED BREACHES HAVE CAUSED THE ALLEGED LOSS

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 7: “THE CLAIMANT AND WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO PLEAD SUCH A CLAIM IN BROAD AND VAGUE TERMS”: A CLAIMANT HAS TO PLEAD HOW THE ALLEGED BREACHES HAVE CAUSED THE ALLEGED LOSS

April 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we are looking at an application that was all about the claimant’s inadequate pleadings. After putting the defects right (at at third attempt)  the case was allowed to proceed – but it was a lengthy and expensive process for…

DRAFTING SCHEDULES OF DAMAGES: EFFECTIVE DRAFTING AND AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 29th APRIL 2025

DRAFTING SCHEDULES OF DAMAGES: EFFECTIVE DRAFTING AND AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 29th APRIL 2025

April 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

Over the past few months we have looked at cases where claimants have claimed damages for working 24.4 hours a day, where the contents of a  a schedule were found to amount to fundamental dishonesty and where a schedule was…

APPELLANT FILED APPEAL WITH TWO MINUTES TO SPARE: HOWEVER IT WAS FILED IMPROPERLY AND THE APPEAL DISMISSED: THE DANGERS OF HYPERLINKS...

APPELLANT FILED APPEAL WITH TWO MINUTES TO SPARE: HOWEVER IT WAS FILED IMPROPERLY AND THE APPEAL DISMISSED: THE DANGERS OF HYPERLINKS…

April 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Dexter Dias in  Kumar v The General Medical Council (Rev1) [2025] EWHC 820 (Admin) contains an important lesson for all litigants. An appellant left filing a notice of appeal until two minutes before the expiry…

£1 MILLION CASE AUTOMATICALLY STRUCK OUT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: THE FACT THAT THIS WAS A "ROGUE SOLICITOR" WAS NOT A STRONG ARGUMENT IN FAVOUR OF REINSTATEMENT

£1 MILLION CASE AUTOMATICALLY STRUCK OUT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: THE FACT THAT THIS WAS A “ROGUE SOLICITOR” WAS NOT A STRONG ARGUMENT IN FAVOUR OF REINSTATEMENT

April 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The judgment of HHJ Hassall in  Mr Martyn Ian Haynes v Total Plant Hire Limited is available as a link on an article in the Law Society Gazette, available here.  The case involves a detailed consideration of the Denton criteria. In particular some of the arguments on…

WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION: TEN KEY POINTS CONSIDERED: ACT PROMPLY, ACT PROPERLY AND DON'T TELL LIES

WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION: TEN KEY POINTS CONSIDERED: ACT PROMPLY, ACT PROPERLY AND DON’T TELL LIES

April 15, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

Legal Futures carries a report of a paralegal banned from the profession because she tried to cover up a mistake by lying to the court.  This gives me a reason to reiterate points made regularly on this blog about what…

"THE DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK": COURT REFUSES DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WHEN COSTS BUDGET WAS SERVED LATE: NOT DUE TO LATENESS BUT BECAUSE OF THE INADEQUATE BUDGET AND EXPLANATIONS GIVEN

“THE DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK”: COURT REFUSES DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WHEN COSTS BUDGET WAS SERVED LATE: NOT DUE TO LATENESS BUT BECAUSE OF THE INADEQUATE BUDGET AND EXPLANATIONS GIVEN

April 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content

In Stephen Herbert Hunt v Oceania Capital Reserves Limited & Ors [2025] EWHC 837 (Ch) Master Brightwell refused the second and third defendants application for relief from sanctions in a case where the costs budget was served late.  However it…

PART 36 OFFER WAS VALID DESPITE THE FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE "RELEVANT PERIOD": THE HISTORY OF OFFERS IS IMPORTANT

PART 36 OFFER WAS VALID DESPITE THE FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE “RELEVANT PERIOD”: THE HISTORY OF OFFERS IS IMPORTANT

April 8, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

Important issues relating to the construction of Part 36 were considered in detail by Mr Justice Calver in Henderson & Jones Ltd v Salica Investments Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 838 (Comm). The claimant’s failure to specify the “relevant period”…

"A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY": WHEN DOES TIME FOR APPEALING START TO RUN WHEN A JUDGMENT IS SENT OUT? CLARITY IS ESSENTIAL

“A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY”: WHEN DOES TIME FOR APPEALING START TO RUN WHEN A JUDGMENT IS SENT OUT? CLARITY IS ESSENTIAL

March 18, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Extensions of time, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Hayden in  F (A Minor) (Permission To Appeal) [2025] EWHC 638 (Fam) highlights a trap for those seeking permission to appeal.  The time for appealing runs from the date that the order was announced and…

"THIS IS AN UNUSUAL PROBATE CLAIM IN THAT THE DECEASED SAYS SHE IS VERY MUCH ALIVE": A CHAOTIC TRIAL WHERE NO-ONE SEEMS TO HAVE THE SAME PAGINATION IN THE BUNDLES: AND THATS NOT EVEN HALF OF THE PROBLEMS...

“THIS IS AN UNUSUAL PROBATE CLAIM IN THAT THE DECEASED SAYS SHE IS VERY MUCH ALIVE”: A CHAOTIC TRIAL WHERE NO-ONE SEEMS TO HAVE THE SAME PAGINATION IN THE BUNDLES: AND THATS NOT EVEN HALF OF THE PROBLEMS…

March 11, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Case Management, Members Content

 The past few weeks have led to a number of cases about bundles. My working theory about trial and application bundles is that problematic bundles often reflect a  much deeper malaise in the case itself.   Support for that theory can…

A WITNESS STATEMENT IS FOR EVIDENCE AND NOT SUBMISSIONS (SOMETHING THIS BLOG HAS OBSERVED MANY TIMES IN THE PAST...)

A WITNESS STATEMENT IS FOR EVIDENCE AND NOT SUBMISSIONS (SOMETHING THIS BLOG HAS OBSERVED MANY TIMES IN THE PAST…)

February 24, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Witness statements

We are returning to the judgment of Senior Master Cook in  Lexi-Rae Speirs v St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2025] EWHC 337 (KB).  The Master observed that the witness evidence served in support of the claimant’s application went…

EMAIL SERVICE ON SOLICITORS THAT HAD ACTED IN OTHER PROCEEDINGS WAS NOT GOOD SERVICE

EMAIL SERVICE ON SOLICITORS THAT HAD ACTED IN OTHER PROCEEDINGS WAS NOT GOOD SERVICE

February 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Kostakopoulou v University of Warwick & Ors [2025] EWHC 342 (KB) Mr Justice Bourne considered issues relating to service of the defendants by email.  He held that, in the absence of express consent to accept proceedings by email in…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THE MEANING OF "LAST KNOWN RESIDENCE" AND "REASONABLE STEPS" TO ASCERTAIN A CURRENT RESIDENCE

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: THE MEANING OF “LAST KNOWN RESIDENCE” AND “REASONABLE STEPS” TO ASCERTAIN A CURRENT RESIDENCE

February 18, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

The question of service of the claim form and  “last known residence”  has  featured already  on this blog this year.  There is another case on the issue in the judgment of Mr Justice Bryan in  Agrofirma Oniks LLC & Anor…

AVOIDING LIMITATION PROBLEMS AND MAKING AN EFFECTIVE SECTION 33 APPLICATION: WEBINAR 20th FEBRUARY 2025

AVOIDING LIMITATION PROBLEMS AND MAKING AN EFFECTIVE SECTION 33 APPLICATION: WEBINAR 20th FEBRUARY 2025

February 17, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Limitation, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

Limitation issues feature regularly on this blog and are a major reason for litigators being sued.  This webinar looks at the major problem areas in limitation for personal injury and clinical negligence litigators. It identifies, and helps litigators avoid, all…

THE NEED FOR THE UTMOST CARE WHEN SEEKING INJUNCTIONS WITH SPEED: AN ENQUIRY AS TO DAMAGES ORDERED BECAUSE OF ERRORS MADE IN THE INFORMATION GIVEN TO THE JUDGE

THE NEED FOR THE UTMOST CARE WHEN SEEKING INJUNCTIONS WITH SPEED: AN ENQUIRY AS TO DAMAGES ORDERED BECAUSE OF ERRORS MADE IN THE INFORMATION GIVEN TO THE JUDGE

February 17, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Injunctions, Members Content

The judgment of HHJ Halliwell, sitting as a High Court Judge, in  Bootle v GHL Property Management and Development Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 317 (Ch) provides an object lesson on the dangers of over-hasty applications for an injunction.   It…

SERVICE ON A SOLICITOR WAS NOT GOOD SERVICE: A PARTY DOES NOT NECESSARILY ACCEPT SOLICITOR SERVICE FOR ALL PURPOSES

SERVICE ON A SOLICITOR WAS NOT GOOD SERVICE: A PARTY DOES NOT NECESSARILY ACCEPT SOLICITOR SERVICE FOR ALL PURPOSES

February 14, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings Inc & Anor [2025] EWHC 283 (Comm)  Mrs Justice Cockerill found that an application had not been properly served. The applicant had served the respondent on solicitors who had acted for him in…

← Previous 1 … 4 5 6 … 11 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 16.8K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • CHILD CLAIMANTS AND LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIMS: WEBINAR 20th APRIL 2026: NOW WITH GREATLY EXPANDED QUESTIONNAIRE
  • AN APPEAL WAS LODGED IN TIME: SOMETIMES THE COURT DOES NOT HELP – BUT HINDER: “I HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THE COURT THWARTED THE LITIGANT’S PROPER AND REASONABLE ATTEMPT TO BRING THE APPEAL IN TIME”
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: THE DANGERS OF LETTING WITNESSES GIVE “OPINION” EVIDENCE: TWELVE YEARS ON AND THINGS MAY HAVE NOT CHANGED THAT MUCH: APRIL 2014
  • PROVING THINGS 287: CLAIMS FOR FUTURE LOSS OF EARNINGS OF A CHILD: A JUDGMENT FROM YESTERDAY (AND A WEBINAR NEXT MONDAY…)
  • “OVERHEATED LANGUAGE” A “CAVALIER APPROACH” AND “THIN ALLEGATIONS”: WHY IT PAYS TO BE CAREFUL AND DETAILED WHEN MAKING APPLICATIONS TO DISCHARGE INJUNCTIONS

Top Posts

  • AN APPEAL WAS LODGED IN TIME: SOMETIMES THE COURT DOES NOT HELP - BUT HINDER: "I HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THE COURT THWARTED THE LITIGANT'S PROPER AND REASONABLE ATTEMPT TO BRING THE APPEAL IN TIME"
  • CHILD CLAIMANTS AND LOSS OF EARNINGS CLAIMS: WEBINAR 20th APRIL 2026: NOW WITH GREATLY EXPANDED QUESTIONNAIRE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 61: A COMPARISON OF THE LAW SOCIETY GUIDANCE BEFORE AND AFTER THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
  • GRIFFITHS -v- TUI: SUPREME COURT FINDS FOR THE CLAIMANT: THE TRIAL WAS UNFAIR: POINTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUT TO THE EXPERT
  • MAZUR MATTERS 55: THINGS WE DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO (2): WHAT DEGREE OF SUPERVISION IS REQUIRED: THIS "WILL ALWAYS DEPEND ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES"

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.