Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Compliance with peremptory order
ANOTHER ISSUE ABOUT UNLESS ORDERS:  CAN A COURT MAKE AN ORDER SPECIFYING A SUM FOR DAMAGES IF THE DEFENDANT DOES NOT COMPLY?

ANOTHER ISSUE ABOUT UNLESS ORDERS: CAN A COURT MAKE AN ORDER SPECIFYING A SUM FOR DAMAGES IF THE DEFENDANT DOES NOT COMPLY?

February 9, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There have been a number of cases about unless orders recently.  This one looks at the issue of whether the court can make an order and state that, if there is default, the claimant can enter judgment for a specific…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS DENIED AFTER A PATTERN  OF DEFAULT DELAY AND EXCUSES: TO BREACH ONE UNLESS ORDER MAY BE REGARDED AS MISFORTUNE, TO BREACH TWO LOOKS LIKE ...

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS DENIED AFTER A PATTERN OF DEFAULT DELAY AND EXCUSES: TO BREACH ONE UNLESS ORDER MAY BE REGARDED AS MISFORTUNE, TO BREACH TWO LOOKS LIKE …

February 5, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Staying with the theme this week of the making and breaching of peremptory orders  alongside applications for relief from sanctions, we are considering what, on any view, as an “ambitious” application for relief from sanctions.  The defendant here had breached…

COST BITES 319: WHATSAPP MESSAGES CAN FORM PART OF A SOLICITOR'S FILE: THE DEFENDANT FIRM WAS, THEREFORE, IN BREACH OF A PEREMPTORY ORDER

COST BITES 319: WHATSAPP MESSAGES CAN FORM PART OF A SOLICITOR’S FILE: THE DEFENDANT FIRM WAS, THEREFORE, IN BREACH OF A PEREMPTORY ORDER

December 16, 2025 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Peremptory orders

This case raises highly significant issues for all firms of solicitors. It relates specifically to whether messages sent by WhatsApp form from private phones form part of a solicitor’s file. However the case extends to any type of electronic communication,…

DEFENCES STRUCK OUT BECAUSE OF A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PEREMPTORY ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE:  SHOULD RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS BE GRANTED?

DEFENCES STRUCK OUT BECAUSE OF A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PEREMPTORY ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE: SHOULD RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS BE GRANTED?

November 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Relief from sanctions

Here we look at a case where the defendants failed to comply with a peremptory order for disclosure.  The defences stood struck out.  The issue the judge had to determine was whether relief from sanctions should be granted. This in…

ACTION STRUCK OUT BECAUSE CLAIMANT FAILED TO COMPLY PROPERLY WITH AN UNLESS ORDER FOR DETAILS OF FUNDING: DECISION UPHELD ON APPEAL

ACTION STRUCK OUT BECAUSE CLAIMANT FAILED TO COMPLY PROPERLY WITH AN UNLESS ORDER FOR DETAILS OF FUNDING: DECISION UPHELD ON APPEAL

July 8, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Relief from sanctions, Striking out

Here we look at a case where the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that the claimant had failed to comply with the terms of a peremptory order. The action was, therefore, struck out.  It is a salutary and important…

COST BITES 188: MAKING A PEREMPTORY ORDER FOLLOWING A FAILURE TO PAY INTERLOCUTORY COSTS: THE NEED FOR THE RESPONDENT TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE

COST BITES 188: MAKING A PEREMPTORY ORDER FOLLOWING A FAILURE TO PAY INTERLOCUTORY COSTS: THE NEED FOR THE RESPONDENT TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE

October 29, 2024 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content, Peremptory orders

In  Ahmad v Ouajjou & Anor [2024] EWHC 2213 (Comm) HHJ Pelling KC found it was appropriate to make a peremptory order following the defendants’ failure to pay interlocutory costs orders.  (This decision was considered in Ahmad v Ouajjou & Anor…

NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PEREMPTORY ORDERS: THE FULL JUDGMENT IN POWELL -v- WATFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL

NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PEREMPTORY ORDERS: THE FULL JUDGMENT IN POWELL -v- WATFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL

September 23, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Disclosure, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Sanctions

I have written before about the judgment of Mr Justice Jay in Powell -v- Watford Borough Council [2017] EWHC 2283 (QB). The full transcript has now become available. It deals with an important point about the need to follow the…

COMPLYING WITH DIRECTIONS IN THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL: IT CAN BE A TAXING MATTER: PUBLIC BODIES SHOULD LIVE UP TO THE STANDARDS EXPECTED IN THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION

COMPLYING WITH DIRECTIONS IN THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL: IT CAN BE A TAXING MATTER: PUBLIC BODIES SHOULD LIVE UP TO THE STANDARDS EXPECTED IN THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION

August 3, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The decision of the Supreme Court in  BPP Holdings Ltd & Ors v Revenue and Customs [2017] UKSC 55 is interesting for a number of reasons. It is about the provision of textbooks (on law and accountancy presumably) to students….

INADEQUATE DISCLOSURE LEADS TO DEFENCE BEING STRUCK OUT - EVENTUALLY: CASE THAT WAS NOT A WALK IN THE PARK

INADEQUATE DISCLOSURE LEADS TO DEFENCE BEING STRUCK OUT – EVENTUALLY: CASE THAT WAS NOT A WALK IN THE PARK

July 11, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out

There is a brief report on Lawtel today of the case of Powell -v- Watford Borough Council, a decision made yesterday by Mr Justice Jay (10th July 2017) in the Royal Courts of Justice . This post is based in…

PREVENTING DEFENDANT FROM DEFENDING DAMAGES IS AN APPROPRIATE MEANS OF ENFORCING PEREMPTORY ORDERS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

PREVENTING DEFENDANT FROM DEFENDING DAMAGES IS AN APPROPRIATE MEANS OF ENFORCING PEREMPTORY ORDERS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

February 27, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Damages, Members Content, Peremptory orders

 Workman -v- Forrester [2017] EWCA Civ 73 is an important example of the courts using peremptory orders in an attempt to secure compliance.  The Court of Appeal upheld a decision to make a peremptory order that allowed the claimants to…

CLAIMANTS HAD COMPLIED WITH PEREMPTORY ORDER: CASE NOT STRUCK OUT

November 20, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a brief report on Lawtel of the case of Sharma -v- Quality Redfern Solicitors (Ch D Judge Behrens 19/11/2014). The decision concerns the striking out of a claim for breach of an order and the judge finding, on…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • WEBINAR ON PD57AC WITNESS STATEMENTS: NOW AVAILABLE “ON DEMAND”: IF YOU MISSED IT YOU CAN STILL WATCH IT…
  • EXPERT WATCH 46: GUIDANCE AS TO THE INSTRUCTION OF EXPERTS IN THE COURT OF PROTECTION: (BUT SOMETHING FOR ALL OF US TO TAKE AWAY…)
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: “I WROTE LOTS OF UNEDIFYING, AGGRESSIVE AND UNCOOPERATIVE LETTERS: LOOK WHERE IT GOT ME” (MAY 2016)
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE PREPARATION OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: THERE IS NO SATISFACTORY EXPLANATION FOR THIS: HOW DOES THE JUDGE KNOW IT IS THE WITNESS’S OWN WORDS?
  • FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL OUT OF TIME: A TALE OF THREE CITIES: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED WHEN THE APPEAL WAS LATE BUT THE SOLICITORS “DID NOTHING WRONG AT ALL”

Top Posts

  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE PREPARATION OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: THERE IS NO SATISFACTORY EXPLANATION FOR THIS: HOW DOES THE JUDGE KNOW IT IS THE WITNESS'S OWN WORDS?
  • SERVICE POINTS 38: THE CLAIMANT SERVES AT THE WRONG ADDRESS BUT THE DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPLY IN TIME (A CLASSIC STORY)
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 68: COURT OF APPEAL HOLDS THAT THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE ALLOWED AMENDMENTS: THE PLEADINGS WERE "INCOHERENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INSUFFICIENTLY PARTICULARISED"
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: "I WROTE LOTS OF UNEDIFYING, AGGRESSIVE AND UNCOOPERATIVE LETTERS: LOOK WHERE IT GOT ME" (MAY 2016)
  • FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL OUT OF TIME: A TALE OF THREE CITIES: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED WHEN THE APPEAL WAS LATE BUT THE SOLICITORS "DID NOTHING WRONG AT ALL"

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.