Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Costs against non- parties
COST BITES 326: DEFENDANT SUCCESSFUL IN  OBTAINING A NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER: FARES FAIR IN THE BUS STATION CASE...

COST BITES 326: DEFENDANT SUCCESSFUL IN OBTAINING A NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER: FARES FAIR IN THE BUS STATION CASE…

January 13, 2026 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

This judgment today is an interesting illustration of the fact that those providing support to a party can find themselves the subject of a non-party costs order. In this case the claimant company was in liquidation. The respondents to the…

APPLICATION FOR NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER DISMISSED: THIS TIGER HAD NO TEETH...

APPLICATION FOR NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER DISMISSED: THIS TIGER HAD NO TEETH…

February 20, 2023 · by gexall · in Applications, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

There have been a number of cases relating to non-party costs orders. The claimant’s application for such an order failed in  Paper Mache Tiger Ltd v Lee Mathews Workroom PTY Ltd [2023] EWHC 338 (Comm). John Kimbell KC, sitting as…

INSURER NOT LIABLE TO PAY CLAIMANTS' COSTS: TRAVELERS INSURANCE DECISION OVERTURNED BY THE SUPREME COURT

INSURER NOT LIABLE TO PAY CLAIMANTS’ COSTS: TRAVELERS INSURANCE DECISION OVERTURNED BY THE SUPREME COURT

October 30, 2019 · by gexall · in Appeals, Conduct, Costs, Members Content

In the judgment today in Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ [2019] UKSC 48 the Supreme Court held that the insurer was not liable to pay the costs of those claimants who had proceeded (unknowingly) against uninsured defendants.  This is…

NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER AGAINST INSURER: UNTANGLING THE WEB

NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER AGAINST INSURER: UNTANGLING THE WEB

January 16, 2019 · by gexall · in Conduct, Costs, Members Content

In Various Claimants v Giambrone & Law (a firm) & Ors [2019] EWHC 34 (QB) a non-party costs order was made against the defendant insurers.  It provides a (fairly complex) example of a court determining a non-party order. This “summary procedure”…

COSTS AGAINST NON-PARTIES: COSTS ORDER NOT MADE AGAINST DIRECTOR

COSTS AGAINST NON-PARTIES: COSTS ORDER NOT MADE AGAINST DIRECTOR

April 30, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

When is it appropriate to make an order against a director personally? This issue was considered  in Housemaker Services Ltd -v- Cole [2017] EWHC 924 (Ch)  by HHJ Paul Mattews (sitting as a High Court Judge).  The judge declined to…

COSTS AGAINST NON-PARTIES: NOTHING LOST IN TRANSLATION: THE CAPITA CASE CONSIDERED

February 2, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

The decision today of Sir James Munby In the Matter of Capita Translation and Interpreting Limited [2015] EWFC 5 reiterates the principles of costs against third parties. The judgment contains a detailed review of the law relating to cost liability…

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • TUPE DOES NOT PASS ON LIABILITIES TO THIRD PARTIES: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY
  • COST BITES 448: THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY HAS TO PAY THE FULL COSTS OF LOSING AN ACTION: ARGUMENTS ABOUT “CHILLING EFFECT” WERE NOT ESTABLISHED AND NOT EVIDENCED IN ANY EVENT
  • COST BITES 447 : SHOULD A DEFENDANT’S DERAILMENT OF AN EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION LEAD TO INDEMNITY COSTS ORDERS BEING MADE AGAINST IT?
  • LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AVOIDING THE PITFALLS (2): HOW TO SPOT “FALSE” AUTHORITIES AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT (PLUS SOME USEFUL LINKS)
  • BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: LAWYERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (1): THREE IMPORTANT PRINCIPLES: YOU OWN THE WORK; AI IS NOT AN AUTHORITATIVE SOURCE OF LAW; IT IS NOT ENOUGH THAT THE CASE EXISTS…

Top Posts

EXPERT WATCH 70: EXPERTS' FAILURES TO REPORT ON THE RANGE OF OPINIONS LEADS TO THEIR VIEWS BEING REJECTED: ESSENTIAL READING FOR EVERY PERSONAL INJURY AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYER, ANYONE WHO INSTRUCTS AN EXPERT (AND ANY EXPERT...)
TUPE DOES NOT PASS ON LIABILITIES TO THIRD PARTIES: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION TODAY
SETTING ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT, DENTON AND DELAY: SHOULD THE COURT REFUSE THE DEFENDANT RELIEF BECAUSE THEY HAD CAUSED UNNECESSARY DELAY AND COSTS?
DEALING WITH FISH FILES, PROCRASTINATION AND DELAY: THE LITIGATOR'S FRIEND: A REMINDER OF USEFUL LINKS, POSTS AND GUIDANCE AND SOME USEFUL CHECKLISTS
WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: "BACKDATING LETTERS" TO DELIBERATELY MISLEAD COULD COST YOU: £4.58 MILLION IN THIS CASE: (METADATA COMES INTO PLAY NOW)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.