COST BITES 411: NON-PARTY COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST CLAIMANT’S DIRECTOR : HE WHO EXPECTS TO BENEFIT RUNS A RISK OF PAYING THE COSTS…

This case considers the issue of whether it was appropriate to make a non-party costs order. The Master reached a clear conclusion that it was.   The individual in question was effectively the driving force behind the litigation in addition to being the funder. "A funder of litigation who either con...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below