Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » service of the claim form » Page 3
SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS: SECTION 1140 OF THE COMPANIES ACT CAN BE USED TO SERVE A DIRECTOR RESIDENT ABROAD

SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS: SECTION 1140 OF THE COMPANIES ACT CAN BE USED TO SERVE A DIRECTOR RESIDENT ABROAD

September 19, 2023 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC v Shetty & Ors [2020] EWHC 3423 (Comm) [a case newly arrived on BAILII) Mr Justice Bryan held that s.1140 of the Companies Act 2006 can be used to serve proceedings on a director,…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: AMBIGUITY IN DEFENDANT'S INSTRUCTIONS LED TO A (VERY RARE) CASE OF A CLAIMANT SUCCEEDING ON CPR 6.15

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: AMBIGUITY IN DEFENDANT’S INSTRUCTIONS LED TO A (VERY RARE) CASE OF A CLAIMANT SUCCEEDING ON CPR 6.15

September 4, 2023 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form

In London Fluid System Technologies Ltd & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2023] EWHC 2206 (Admin) Mrs Justice Foster made an order under CPR 6.15 when the claimants had mistakenly served the defendant at…

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY: DEFENDANT FAILS TO NOTICE AND APPLIES TO STRIKE OUT ACTION: APPLICATION WAS UNNECCESARY & DEFENDANT NOT AWARDED COSTS

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY: DEFENDANT FAILS TO NOTICE AND APPLIES TO STRIKE OUT ACTION: APPLICATION WAS UNNECCESARY & DEFENDANT NOT AWARDED COSTS

July 17, 2023 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Members Content, Service of the claim form

In Johnson v Devon And Cornwall Police & Ors [2023] EWHC 690 (Ch) HHJ Paul Matthews (sitting as a High Court Judge) held that a defendant should have known that the proceedings against it had not been served properly.  The…

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM ISSUE: NO SEAL NO CASE: "SERVICE MEANS HAVING A SEALED CLAIM FORM IN HAND WHICH CAN BE PROVIDED TO THE DEFENDANT"

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM ISSUE: NO SEAL NO CASE: “SERVICE MEANS HAVING A SEALED CLAIM FORM IN HAND WHICH CAN BE PROVIDED TO THE DEFENDANT”

June 28, 2023 · by gexall · in Appeals, Court fees, Members Content, Service of the claim form

In Clewer v Higgs & Sons (a firm) [2023] EWHC 1556 (Ch) Mr Justice Adam Johnson upheld a decision that the claimants had failed to serve a claim form properly.  The judge held that the requirement to serve a sealed…

COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION NOT TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: PROBLEMS WITH ISSUE, SERVICE AND NOTICE OF APPLICATIONS: ALL LITIGATION LIFE IS HERE...

COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION NOT TO GRANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: PROBLEMS WITH ISSUE, SERVICE AND NOTICE OF APPLICATIONS: ALL LITIGATION LIFE IS HERE…

June 27, 2023 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

In Elo Trustees Ltd v Bonhams 1793 Ltd & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 664 the Court of Appeal upheld  a decision not to give relief from sanctions. The case is illustrative of a large number of the dangers of litigation….

CLAIMANTS COME TO GRIEF OVER SERVICE OF UNSEALED CLAIM FORM: COURT OF APPEAL HOLD THAT CPR 3.10 APPLIES TO DEFENDANT'S MISCARACTERISED APPLICATION

CLAIMANTS COME TO GRIEF OVER SERVICE OF UNSEALED CLAIM FORM: COURT OF APPEAL HOLD THAT CPR 3.10 APPLIES TO DEFENDANT’S MISCARACTERISED APPLICATION

June 26, 2023 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form

It is rarely possible to get to the end of a month without some kind of discussion on this blog about service of the claim form. This month is no exception. In Pitalia & Anor v NHS England [2023] EWCA…

"IT WAS TWENTY YEARS AGO TODAY": A BATCH OF SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASES IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: A CHANCE TO REVIEW (OR REMINISCE..)

“IT WAS TWENTY YEARS AGO TODAY”: A BATCH OF SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASES IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: A CHANCE TO REVIEW (OR REMINISCE..)

May 14, 2023 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form

The  Court of Appeal judgment in Cranfield & Anor v Bridgegrove Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 656 was given 20 years ago today.   One of the aims of that judgment was to clarify issues relating to service of the claim form…

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM CASE TO BRIGHTEN UP YOUR DAY: SERVICE AT THE LAST KNOWN ADDRESS: CLAIMANT SUCCESSFUL IN HIS ARGUMENTS ABOUT KNOWLEDGE

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM CASE TO BRIGHTEN UP YOUR DAY: SERVICE AT THE LAST KNOWN ADDRESS: CLAIMANT SUCCESSFUL IN HIS ARGUMENTS ABOUT KNOWLEDGE

May 3, 2023 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form

There are a number of issues relating to service of the claim form in the judgment of Peter MacDonald Eggers KC (sitting as a High Court Judge) in Boettcher v (Xio (UK) LLP & Ors [2023] EWHC 801 (Comm). Here…

FAILURE TO SERVE A DEFENDANT PROPERLY AND ISSUING OUT OF TIME: HIGH COURT DECISION

FAILURE TO SERVE A DEFENDANT PROPERLY AND ISSUING OUT OF TIME: HIGH COURT DECISION

April 3, 2023 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Limitation, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Muhammad v Daily The News International & Ors (Rev1) [2023] EWHC 674 (KB) Master Cook determined a number of procedural issues.  Here we look at two: (1) the failure to serve on a defendant properly; (2) the question of…

ISSUING IN HASTE BEFORE APRIL 6th: DO NOT REPENT AT LEISURE WITH SERVICE ISSUES IN FOUR MONTHS' TIME

ISSUING IN HASTE BEFORE APRIL 6th: DO NOT REPENT AT LEISURE WITH SERVICE ISSUES IN FOUR MONTHS’ TIME

March 29, 2023 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Useful links

I have been told that there has been a flurry of activity this week with claimants anxious to issue proceedings before the change in the rules relating to QOCS. One problem with this is that there will now be numerous…

AGREEING EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR SERVICE: THE ESSENTIAL POINT THAT THEY MUST BE IN WRITING

AGREEING EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR SERVICE: THE ESSENTIAL POINT THAT THEY MUST BE IN WRITING

March 28, 2023 · by gexall · in Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

An interesting issue about “agreements” is referred to in the judgment of Mr Justice Kerr in  Clarion Housing Association Ltd v Crest Nicholson Operations Ltd [2023] EWHC 620 (TCC). I will be looking at the case in more detail later. …

SERVICE ON A SOLICITOR WAS NOT DEFECTIVE: WHAT IS MEANT BY A "PLACE OF BUSINESS"?

SERVICE ON A SOLICITOR WAS NOT DEFECTIVE: WHAT IS MEANT BY A “PLACE OF BUSINESS”?

March 6, 2023 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Ellison Road Ltd v Mian (t/a HKH Kenwright & Cox Solicitors) & Anor [2023] EWHC 375 (Ch) Master Brightwell rejected a defendant’s argument that he had not been properly served at his “place of business”.  The case shows the…

THE CLAIMANT HAD SIX WEEKS TO ISSUE AND SERVE THE CLAIM FORM AND WAS ONE DAY LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

THE CLAIMANT HAD SIX WEEKS TO ISSUE AND SERVE THE CLAIM FORM AND WAS ONE DAY LATE: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

February 13, 2023 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Halton Borough Council v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing And Communities [2023] EWHC 293 (Admin)  HHJ Stephen Davies (sitting as a High Court Judge) refused a claimant’s application for relief from sanctions. This was a case where…

COURT REFUSES CLAIMANT'S APPLICATION FOR RETROSPECTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM:CLAIMANT'S ARGUMENTS THAT CPR 3.9 APPLIED FAILED TO FLY

COURT REFUSES CLAIMANT’S APPLICATION FOR RETROSPECTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM:CLAIMANT’S ARGUMENTS THAT CPR 3.9 APPLIED FAILED TO FLY

February 8, 2023 · by gexall · in Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Regular readers may be concerned that we have got through to the second week of February of the year and we have not yet had a claims form case.  (There are several in the pipeline.)  I am grateful to  barrister…

IT IS THE CLAIMANTS' JOB TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM ON TIME: HIGH COURT REJECTS ARGUMENT THAT DEFENDANTS WERE ESTOPPED FROM TAKING THE POINT: CLAIMANTS' OTHER ARGUMENT COME TO GRIEF

IT IS THE CLAIMANTS’ JOB TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM ON TIME: HIGH COURT REJECTS ARGUMENT THAT DEFENDANTS WERE ESTOPPED FROM TAKING THE POINT: CLAIMANTS’ OTHER ARGUMENT COME TO GRIEF

August 30, 2022 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

We are always seeing new ways in which mistakes are made in relation to service of the claim form. In Lonsdale & Ors v Wedlake Bell Llp & Ors [2022] EWHC 2169 (QB)the claimants agreed an extension of time to…

PROVING THINGS 235: PROVING SERVICE: COUNCIL'S WHOLESALE FAILURE TO SERVE CLAIM FORMS PROPERLY: ATTEMPTS AT PERSONAL SERVICE WERE A PREREQUISITE TO SERVICE BY ALTERNATIVE MEANS

PROVING THINGS 235: PROVING SERVICE: COUNCIL’S WHOLESALE FAILURE TO SERVE CLAIM FORMS PROPERLY: ATTEMPTS AT PERSONAL SERVICE WERE A PREREQUISITE TO SERVICE BY ALTERNATIVE MEANS

August 8, 2022 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Service of the claim form

An important point as to service of the claim form arose in the judgment of Mr Justice Nicklin in Thurrock Council v Stokes & Ors [2022] EWHC 1998 (QB). The claimant had issued proceedings against multiple defendants. It obtained an…

THE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION TO SERVE A CLAIM FORM: "CLEAR WATER" BETWEEN THE TWO TESTS: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS ORDER SETTING ASIDE A PROSPECTIVE APPLICATION FOR SERVICE

THE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION TO SERVE A CLAIM FORM: “CLEAR WATER” BETWEEN THE TWO TESTS: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS ORDER SETTING ASIDE A PROSPECTIVE APPLICATION FOR SERVICE

July 27, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form

In ST v BAI (SA) Trading As Brittany Ferries [2022] EWCA Civ 1037  the Court of Appeal overturned a decision, itself made on appeal, where a prospective application to extend time for service of the claim form was set aside….

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM CASE: ANOTHER CLAIMANT COMES TO GRIEF OVER SERVICE OF AN UNSEALED CLAIM FORM: DEFENDANT,HOWEVER, SAVED BY CPR 3.10.

ANOTHER CLAIM FORM CASE: ANOTHER CLAIMANT COMES TO GRIEF OVER SERVICE OF AN UNSEALED CLAIM FORM: DEFENDANT,HOWEVER, SAVED BY CPR 3.10.

June 27, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Service of the claim form

In Pitalia & Anor v NHS Commissioning Board [2022] EWHC 1636_2 (QB) His Honour Judge Pearce dismissed a claimant’s appeal in a case where the claim form had not been validly served.  The defendant had made an error in that…

SERVICE BY EMAIL WAS NOT GOOD SERVICE: A CLAIMANT NEEDS A SPECIFIC STATEMENT THAT SERVICE WILL BE ACCEPTED: APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME REFUSED

SERVICE BY EMAIL WAS NOT GOOD SERVICE: A CLAIMANT NEEDS A SPECIFIC STATEMENT THAT SERVICE WILL BE ACCEPTED: APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME REFUSED

June 23, 2022 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In  Karanja, R (On the Application Of) v University of the West of Scotland [2022] EWHC 1520 (Admin) Michael Ford QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, found that a claim form had not been served when it was…

ANOTHER FAILED SERVICE CASE: AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT SERVICE BY EMAIL DID NOT EXTEND TO DOCUMENTS ALREADY SENT

ANOTHER FAILED SERVICE CASE: AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT SERVICE BY EMAIL DID NOT EXTEND TO DOCUMENTS ALREADY SENT

April 5, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Webinar

We have another case falling foul of the provisions in relation to service. In Allen v Mittal [2022] EWHC 762 (Ch) Deputy Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Agnello QC rejected an applicant’s arguments that an application had been served properly. …

COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION SETTING ASIDE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: CASE ON HEAD OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT GOES BUST

COURT OF APPEAL UPHOLDS DECISION SETTING ASIDE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: CASE ON HEAD OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT GOES BUST

March 30, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In  Qatar Investment and Project Development Holding Company & Anor v Phoenix Ancient Art SA (Rev1) [2022] EWCA Civ 422 the Court of Appeal upheld a decision setting aside an order granting an extension of time for service of the…

WHEN DEFENDANTS MAKE AN APPLICATION IN RELATION TO SERVICE: WHAT METHOD MUST THEY USE? IS PART 11 MANDATORY?

WHEN DEFENDANTS MAKE AN APPLICATION IN RELATION TO SERVICE: WHAT METHOD MUST THEY USE? IS PART 11 MANDATORY?

March 28, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form

We are taking a second look at the judgment of Lord Justice Nugee in Hand Held Products, Inc & Anor v Zebra Technologies Europe Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 640 (Ch). This time in relation to that part of the…

SERVING THE CLAIM  FORM PROPERLY - THE DIRE PROBLEMS IF YOU DON'T, AND THE LESSONS TO BE LEARNT FROM GOOD LAW: WEBINAR 11th APRIL 2022

SERVING THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY – THE DIRE PROBLEMS IF YOU DON’T, AND THE LESSONS TO BE LEARNT FROM GOOD LAW: WEBINAR 11th APRIL 2022

March 24, 2022 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Webinar

The decision of the Court of Appeal  today in The Good Law Project, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Health And Social Care [2022] EWCA Civ 35 emphasises the need for all litigators to know,…

COURT OF APPEAL DISMISSES APPEAL WHEN CLAIM FORM SERVED ONE DAY LATE: "RELIANCE ON NON-COMPLIANT SERVICE IS NOT ONE OF THE INSTANCES OF OPPORTUNISM DEPRECATED BY THE COURTS"

COURT OF APPEAL DISMISSES APPEAL WHEN CLAIM FORM SERVED ONE DAY LATE: “RELIANCE ON NON-COMPLIANT SERVICE IS NOT ONE OF THE INSTANCES OF OPPORTUNISM DEPRECATED BY THE COURTS”

March 24, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form

In The Good Law Project, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Health And Social Care [2022] EWCA Civ 35 the Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant’s appeal against a a decision not granting any relief…

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY: NOT A PLACE WHERE THIS DEFENDANT CARRIED OUT BUSINESS: SERVING THE RIGHT ZEBRA AND THE RIGHT ADDRESS

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY: NOT A PLACE WHERE THIS DEFENDANT CARRIED OUT BUSINESS: SERVING THE RIGHT ZEBRA AND THE RIGHT ADDRESS

March 24, 2022 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form

Master McCloud once wrote that it was the months of April and May that led to a seasonal crop of claim form issues in the Masters’ corridor. However, as regular readers this blog will know the season is a very…

COURT REFUSES TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT IN RELATION TO SOLICITOR'S COSTS: SERVICE AT AN ADDRESS IN THE REGISTER IS THE PRICE OF BEING A DIRECTOR

COURT REFUSES TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT IN RELATION TO SOLICITOR’S COSTS: SERVICE AT AN ADDRESS IN THE REGISTER IS THE PRICE OF BEING A DIRECTOR

February 21, 2022 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Setting aside judgment

In Farrer & Co LLP v Meyer [2022] EWHC 362 (QB) Mr Justice Kerr refused to set aside a long-standing judgment on a bill for solicitor’s costs.  The judgment also considered the importance of s.1140 of the Companies Act 2006….

CLAIM FAILS WHEN CLAIMANT SERVES A FIRM OF SOLICITORS AT THE WRONG ADDRESS: COURT REFUSES TO EXTEND CLAIM FORM

CLAIM FAILS WHEN CLAIMANT SERVES A FIRM OF SOLICITORS AT THE WRONG ADDRESS: COURT REFUSES TO EXTEND CLAIM FORM

February 10, 2022 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form

In  Kelly v Ralli Ltd [2022] EWHC B5 (Costs)  Cost Judge Rowley found that a claimant had failed to serve a claim form at the correct address.  The action therefore failed. “The rules governing service are clear that it is the…

SERVICE WITHOUT A SMILE: CLAIMANTS COME TO GRIEF IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: SENDING AN UNSEALED CLAIM FORM IS NOT GOOD SERVICE, THE CLAIMANTS COULD NOT RELY ON CPR 3.10

SERVICE WITHOUT A SMILE: CLAIMANTS COME TO GRIEF IN THE COURT OF APPEAL: SENDING AN UNSEALED CLAIM FORM IS NOT GOOD SERVICE, THE CLAIMANTS COULD NOT RELY ON CPR 3.10

January 13, 2022 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Service of the claim form

The first (but probably not the last) case on service of the claim form arrives in January, with the Court of Appeal decision in  Ideal Shopping Direct Ltd & Ors v Mastercard Incorporated & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 14.  It…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WHEN THE DEFENDANT NEEDS AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO TAKE POINTS AS TO SERVICE: PROBLEMS BORN IN THE US OF A.

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WHEN THE DEFENDANT NEEDS AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO TAKE POINTS AS TO SERVICE: PROBLEMS BORN IN THE US OF A.

November 29, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Joe Macari Servicing Ltd v Chequered Flag International Inc [2021] EWHC 3175 (QB) Master Dagnall considered a case where the defendant required an extension of time in order to take points in relation to service of proceedings. The Master…

ARE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM PROPERLY SERVED IF SENT  (AT THE 12th HOUR) IN THE POST WITH THE CLAIM FORM? CIRCUIT JUDGE DECISION ON APPEAL

ARE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM PROPERLY SERVED IF SENT (AT THE 12th HOUR) IN THE POST WITH THE CLAIM FORM? CIRCUIT JUDGE DECISION ON APPEAL

November 28, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

I am grateful to barrister  Christopher Johnson for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Ralton in the case of Ellis -v- The Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary (HHJ Ralton, 16th November 2021).  The judge was…

IF YOU ARE APPLYING FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS "OWN YOUR MISTAKES": YOU HAVE TO SERVE THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM WITHIN FOUR MONTHS: CLAIMANT IN ERROR, BUT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED

IF YOU ARE APPLYING FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS “OWN YOUR MISTAKES”: YOU HAVE TO SERVE THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM WITHIN FOUR MONTHS: CLAIMANT IN ERROR, BUT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED

November 23, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

The judgment in  Holterman v Electrium Sales Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3915 (TCC) shows a “classic” error in relation to service of proceedings. The claimant served the claim form at the end of the relevant period, and the particulars…

HOW ISSUING ELECTRONICALLY CAN REALLY CONFUSE CLAIMANTS: PROCEEDINGS SERVED INCORRECTLY AND LATE, SAVED BY SERVICE OF AN UNSEALED CLAIM FORM

HOW ISSUING ELECTRONICALLY CAN REALLY CONFUSE CLAIMANTS: PROCEEDINGS SERVED INCORRECTLY AND LATE, SAVED BY SERVICE OF AN UNSEALED CLAIM FORM

October 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Adding to the regular supply of cases on service of the claim form on this blog is the decision of Mr Justice Fraser in Citysprint UK Ltd v Barts Health NHS Trust [2021] EWHC 2618 (TCC). This case contains a…

SERVING PROCEEDINGS ON "PERSONS UNKNOWN": AN ONGOING ISSUE - WITH NO EASY ANSWER

SERVING PROCEEDINGS ON “PERSONS UNKNOWN”: AN ONGOING ISSUE – WITH NO EASY ANSWER

September 22, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In the course of his judgment in  The London Borough of Hackney v Grant& Ors [2021] EWHC 2548 (QB) Mr Justice Lavender considered the issue of service on persons unknown. WEBINAR ON SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM On the 24th…

WHEN IS PERSONAL SERVICE EFFECTED? A CASE THAT REVIEWED THE PRINCIPLES

WHEN IS PERSONAL SERVICE EFFECTED? A CASE THAT REVIEWED THE PRINCIPLES

September 11, 2021 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

Since issues relating to personal service of proceedings are in the news this may a good time to review the principles. In Tseitline -v- Mikhelson [2015] EWHC 3065 (Comm) Mr Justice Phillips reviewed the rules as to whether effective personal…

WHY NOT KNOWING THE RULES ABOUT SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM COULD COST YOU MORE THAN YOU WILL EVER EARN...

WHY NOT KNOWING THE RULES ABOUT SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM COULD COST YOU MORE THAN YOU WILL EVER EARN…

September 6, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Webinar

So far this year there have been over half a dozen cases relating to mis-service of the claim form reported on this blog.   In many of the cases the claimant’s difficulties appear to be virtually self-inflicted.   Several of the cases…

THAT CASE WHERE A CLAIMANT'S LAWYERS FAILED TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY (THE SECOND TIME AGAINST THE SOLICITORS WHO WERE NEGLIGENT ON THE FIRST OCCASION)

THAT CASE WHERE A CLAIMANT’S LAWYERS FAILED TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY (THE SECOND TIME AGAINST THE SOLICITORS WHO WERE NEGLIGENT ON THE FIRST OCCASION)

September 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Professional negligence,, Service of the claim form, Webinar

If ever a case illustrated the dangers of not appreciating the rules as to service of the claim form.  Dzekova -v- Thomas Eggar LLP [2015] EWHC 2600 (QB) which we have looked  briefly before.   It reveals a sorry tale of…

MASTER WAS RIGHT TO SET ASIDE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: ANOTHER CLAIMANT'S ACTION BITES THE DUST

MASTER WAS RIGHT TO SET ASIDE AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: ANOTHER CLAIMANT’S ACTION BITES THE DUST

August 9, 2021 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Webinar

The judgment of Mr Justice William Davis  in  Qatar Investment And Projects Holding Co & Anor v Phoenix Ancient Art S.A. [2021] EWHC 2243 (QB) adds to the many, many, cases on this blog that deal with the dangers relating…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: KEY CASES AND ISSUES 2021:  A WEBINAR OF INTEREST TO ALL LITIGATORS

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: KEY CASES AND ISSUES 2021: A WEBINAR OF INTEREST TO ALL LITIGATORS

August 5, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Webinar

There appears to be no end of cases where claimants (and occasionally defendants) come to grief over issues relating to service of the claim form. A knowledge of the principles, and the reasons people often get it wrong, is essential…

ANOTHER SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASE: THE COURT WILL NOT "REWRITE HISTORY":  SERVICE HAS TO TAKE PLACE ACCORDING TO THE RULES: EVEN AGAINST "PERSONS UNKNOWN"

ANOTHER SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM CASE: THE COURT WILL NOT “REWRITE HISTORY”: SERVICE HAS TO TAKE PLACE ACCORDING TO THE RULES: EVEN AGAINST “PERSONS UNKNOWN”

August 2, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

The judgment of Mr Justice Nicklin in London Borough of Ealing v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 2132 (QB) serves as a stark reminder that there is a duty to comply with the rules relating to service of the claim form,…

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY IN £10 MILLION CASE: A PARTY "COURTING DISASTER" HAD BROUGHT THIS SITUATION ON THEMSELVES.

CLAIMANT FAILS TO SERVE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY IN £10 MILLION CASE: A PARTY “COURTING DISASTER” HAD BROUGHT THIS SITUATION ON THEMSELVES.

July 22, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Electronic service,, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

We see a classic mistake as to service of the claim form in the judgment of Mr Justice Fraser in LSREF 3 Tiger Falkirk Ltd I S.a.r.l & Anor v Paragon Building Consultancy Ltd [2021] EWHC 2063 (TCC). The claimant…

FAILURE TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY WHEN YOU ONLY HAVE SEVEN DAYS TO DO SO: THIS MAY NOT BE GOOD LAW BUT IT IS THE LAW...

FAILURE TO SERVE THE CLAIM FORM PROPERLY WHEN YOU ONLY HAVE SEVEN DAYS TO DO SO: THIS MAY NOT BE GOOD LAW BUT IT IS THE LAW…

July 1, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

I have written many times about cases where claimants have come to grief in relation to service of the claim form.  Another example can be found in the judgment of Mrs Justice O’Farrell. In R (on the application of The…

RETROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF SERVICE, THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE AND THE SETTING ASIDE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

RETROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF SERVICE, THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE AND THE SETTING ASIDE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

May 26, 2021 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Setting aside judgment

In  YA II PN Ltd v Frontera Resources Corporation [2021] EWHC 1380 (Comm) Mr Justice Butcher considered the question of whether a default judgment was regular when the court had, retrospectively, validated service of the claim form.  He found that…

ANOTHER ACTIONS FAILS BECAUSE OF LATE SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: NEITHER CPR 3.9 OR 3.10 CAN DIG THE CLAIMANT OUT OF THIS HOLE

ANOTHER ACTIONS FAILS BECAUSE OF LATE SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: NEITHER CPR 3.9 OR 3.10 CAN DIG THE CLAIMANT OUT OF THIS HOLE

April 19, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

Small fortunes could be made by betting that there will be a regular supply of cases on late service of the claim form on this blog (although you would get poor odds). “Dicing with procedural death” appears to be regular…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: 12 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW TO AVOID "DICING WITH PROCEDURAL DEATH"

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: 12 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW TO AVOID “DICING WITH PROCEDURAL DEATH”

March 11, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Service of the claim form remains a continual source of problems for litigators.  Issues relating to service of the claim form are often described as “dicing with procedural death”.  I am here mainly repeating an earlier post on this issue…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM AND THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 11th FEBRUARY 2021

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM AND THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 11th FEBRUARY 2021

February 3, 2021 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Webinar

The problems that claimants face when serving the claim form are well documented on this blog.  I am presenting a webinar on the 11th February 2021 on identifying and avoiding the (many) pitfalls of service of the claim form and…

FIRST SERVICE CASE OF THE YEAR: SERVING PROCEEDINGS IS NOT ALWAYS  A WALK ON THE BEACH

FIRST SERVICE CASE OF THE YEAR: SERVING PROCEEDINGS IS NOT ALWAYS A WALK ON THE BEACH

January 22, 2021 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In Alli-Balogun & On The Beach Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 83 (QB) Mr Justice Bourne considered an issue relating to mis-service of proceedings.  He held that service on a foreign  company on another company, in the same group, with…

SERVICE OF UNSEALED AMENDED CLAIM FORMS DID NOT CONSTITUTE GOOD SERVICE: ALL OF THE CLAIMANTS' ATTEMPT TO REMEDY THE SITUATION COME TO GRIEF: THE CLAIMANTS' CARDS WERE MARKED

SERVICE OF UNSEALED AMENDED CLAIM FORMS DID NOT CONSTITUTE GOOD SERVICE: ALL OF THE CLAIMANTS’ ATTEMPT TO REMEDY THE SITUATION COME TO GRIEF: THE CLAIMANTS’ CARDS WERE MARKED

December 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form

In November I wrote that there had been a lull in reported cases relating to service of the claim form. As predicted that lull did not last long. In Ideal Shopping Direct Ltd & Ors v Visa Europe Ltd &…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WHERE, AND WHY DO THINGS GO WRONG?  THE LULL BEFORE THE STORM?

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WHERE, AND WHY DO THINGS GO WRONG? THE LULL BEFORE THE STORM?

November 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Members Content, Service of the claim form

It has been just over four weeks since the previous post on issues relating to service of the claim form.   I thought I would take advantage of this lull to remind people potential issues relating to service of the claim…

SERVING THE COURT FORM (AFTER) THE LAST MINUTE: COURTING DISASTER LEADING TO A  WASTED COSTS ORDER BEING MADE

SERVING THE COURT FORM (AFTER) THE LAST MINUTE: COURTING DISASTER LEADING TO A WASTED COSTS ORDER BEING MADE

August 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Costs, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Wasted Costs

The judgment of Master Cook in Jovicic & Ors v The Serbian Orthodox Church-Serbian Patriarchy [2020] EWHC 2229 (QB) provides an object lesson on the dangers of not serving the claim form well within the four month period.  The judgment…

ANOTHER SERVICE CASE: SERVICE NOT EFFECTIVE WHEN CLAIMANT NOT ABLE TO SHOW WHICH MAILBOX CLAIM FORM WAS POSTED TO

ANOTHER SERVICE CASE: SERVICE NOT EFFECTIVE WHEN CLAIMANT NOT ABLE TO SHOW WHICH MAILBOX CLAIM FORM WAS POSTED TO

July 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

In the judgment today in  Ivanchev v Velli [2020] EWHC 1917 (QB) HHJ Lewis (sitting as a High Court judge) held that service of the claim form was not effective. Placing it in the mailbox for an apartment where the…

← Previous 1 2 3 4 … 6 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 3: WHY PD57AC WAS INTRODUCED: “THE PROPER AND SENSIBLE SCOPE OF EVIDENCE-IN-CHIEF IS NO LONGER THE STOCK-IN-TRADE KNOWLEDGE OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROOFING WITNESSSES…”
  • PROVING THINGS 288: HOW SHOULD A COURT CONSIDER A CLAIM FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS WHEN THE CLAIMANT IS STILL IN EMPLOYED? SMITH -v- MANCHESTER APPROACH PREVAILS
  • CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 19th JUNE 2026 (TOGETHER WITH A USEFUL QUESTIONNAIRE AND SERIES OF CHECKLISTS)
  • THE “WEAPONISATION” OF APPLICATIONS TO COMMIT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: IT’S NOT CLEVER, IT’S NOT “TOUGH” AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT A MARKETING TOOL
  • COST BITES 378 : REFORM OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974, PART III: READ THE CONSULATION PAPER: A CHANCE TO COMMENT ON THE PROVISIONS THAT ARE “A GREAT MYSTERY” TO MANY SOLICITORS (NOT MY WORDS…)

Top Posts

  • COST (MEGA) BITES 378: WHO WOULD SPEND £15,751,483 PLUS VAT TO RECOVER DAMAGES OF £16.91? (WELCOME TO THE SURREAL WORLD OF "COLLECTIVE PROCEEDINGS": THE CAT ARE CONCERNED THAT LITIGATION IS BEING BROUGHT FOR THE LAWYERS & FUNDERS RATHER THAN CONSUMERS
  • THE "WEAPONISATION" OF APPLICATIONS TO COMMIT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: IT'S NOT CLEVER, IT'S NOT "TOUGH" AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT A MARKETING TOOL
  • WITNESS STATEMENTS SERVED LATE: THE COURT GRANTED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS - BUT... : BE WARY OF MISSING THINGS WHEN OTHER THINGS ARE GOING ON...
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: SCHEDULES AND COUNTER-SCHEDULES ARE NOT A "NUMBER CRUNCHING EXERCISE" (APRIL 2018)
  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 2: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PD57AC: "HE KNOWS NOT OF WHAT HE SPEAKS"

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.