Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.
Browse: Home » Statements of Case
"PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE SERVE QUITE DIFFERENT PURPOSES": THE NEED FOR CLAIMANTS TO PLEAD THEIR CASE WHEN APPLYING FOR AN INJUNCTION

“PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE SERVE QUITE DIFFERENT PURPOSES”: THE NEED FOR CLAIMANTS TO PLEAD THEIR CASE WHEN APPLYING FOR AN INJUNCTION

October 21, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Injunctions, Members Content, Statements of Case

We are looking at a case that deals with two issues: (i) the practice of seeking an injunction without having first issued proceedings; (ii) the desirability of a party seeking an injunction to put a fully pleaded case before the…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 32: CLOSING SUBMISSIONS ARE NO PLACE TO TAKE A POINT THAT HAS NEVER BEEN PLEADED AT ALL

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 32: CLOSING SUBMISSIONS ARE NO PLACE TO TAKE A POINT THAT HAS NEVER BEEN PLEADED AT ALL

October 16, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we are looking at a case where there were manifold issues (“100s of allegations) and where evidence was given over several weeks.  However the claimant attempted to raise a new, unpleaded, issue during closing submissions.  As we shall see…

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CORNER 4: THE DANGERS OF PLEADING ALLEGATIONS OF NEGLIGENCE WITHOUT APPROPRIATE EXPERT EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT (LESSONS HERE FOR ALL LITIGATORS)

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CORNER 4: THE DANGERS OF PLEADING ALLEGATIONS OF NEGLIGENCE WITHOUT APPROPRIATE EXPERT EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT (LESSONS HERE FOR ALL LITIGATORS)

October 13, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Statements of Case, Wasted Costs

There have been several cases dealing with inadequate pleading in clinical negligence cases this year. Here we look at one of them.  It is a case we have looked at already but I wanted to emphasise the point.  Further this…

MAZUR MATTERS 11: WHAT IS MEANT BY "THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION" 2 (A) : WHEN SOMEBODY BREACHED THE ACT AND WAS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT BY ARRANGING FOR THE SERVICE OF PLEADINGS

MAZUR MATTERS 11: WHAT IS MEANT BY “THE CONDUCT OF LITIGATION” 2 (A) : WHEN SOMEBODY BREACHED THE ACT AND WAS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT BY ARRANGING FOR THE SERVICE OF PLEADINGS

October 8, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Comment on the implications  of the Mazur decision goes on unabated.  Some of this is informed commentary, some it is definitely not.  On this site we are going to continue the examination of the primary sources of assistance to litigators…

THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)

October 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Costs, Members Content, Statements of Case, Wasted Costs

Here we are considering a case that covers issues relating to clinical negligence, the drafting of pleadings and wasted costs.  It gives much to think about, particularly for those bringing professional negligence actions. (Choose the right type of doctor before…

UPDATED VERSION OF THE CHANCERY GUIDE: A USEFUL LINK

UPDATED VERSION OF THE CHANCERY GUIDE: A USEFUL LINK

September 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

The Chancery Guide was updated earlier this month.  Here we look at the Practice Note and have a link to the updated Guide itself. FINDING THE LINK The Practice Note that accompanies it gives a link to the Guide itself…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANT OF PLEADINGS 32: "BOTH THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM AND DEFENCE ARE LENGTHY DOCUMENTS, UNJUSTIFIABLY SO"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANT OF PLEADINGS 32: “BOTH THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM AND DEFENCE ARE LENGTHY DOCUMENTS, UNJUSTIFIABLY SO”

September 11, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

We are here honing on in one aspect of a decision that was about allocation.  The judge commented on how poor the pleadings of both side were. The Particulars of Claim and Defence were too long, a Reply was unnecessary. …

MEMBER NEWS: "ON DEMAND" CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF WEBINARS AVAILABLE TO WATCH AT A TIME AND PLACE TO SUIT YOU: WITH DISCOUNTS FOR CLB MEMBERS

MEMBER NEWS: “ON DEMAND” CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF WEBINARS AVAILABLE TO WATCH AT A TIME AND PLACE TO SUIT YOU: WITH DISCOUNTS FOR CLB MEMBERS

September 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Limitation, Relief from sanctions, Risks of litigation, Webinar, Witness statements

Last week we looked at webinars coming up which may be of interest to CLB readers.  CLB members can obtain a discount on these webinars.  The same discount applies to webinars which are now available “on demand”.  These webinars are…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 31: THE DEFENDANT DID NOT WANT TO TAKE A "PLEADING POINT", HOWEVER THE JUDGE REFUSED TO ALLOW THE CLAIMANT TO PURSUE THE ISSUE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 31: THE DEFENDANT DID NOT WANT TO TAKE A “PLEADING POINT”, HOWEVER THE JUDGE REFUSED TO ALLOW THE CLAIMANT TO PURSUE THE ISSUE

August 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

We are looking at a case where a claimant, in closing submissions, attempted to take a point that had never been pleaded.  The defendants stance was that it did not want to take a “pleading point”, however the judge found…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 30: WHEN A LAWYER DEFENDANT TRIES TO ARGUE A POINT DIRECTLY CONTRADICTORY TO ITS PLEADED CASE: THIS "FLIES IN THE FACE OF THE PLEADED ADMISSION"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 30: WHEN A LAWYER DEFENDANT TRIES TO ARGUE A POINT DIRECTLY CONTRADICTORY TO ITS PLEADED CASE: THIS “FLIES IN THE FACE OF THE PLEADED ADMISSION”

August 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

We are continuing to look at the interesting inter-lawyer dispute considered in the previous post.  This time at the defendant’s pleaded case and its attempt to resile from a clear admission and put an alternative case in its place. (You…

ALLOCATION TO THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK OR FAST TRACK IN HOUSING CASES 3: WEBINAR 10th SEPTEMBER 2025

ALLOCATION TO THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK OR FAST TRACK IN HOUSING CASES 3: WEBINAR 10th SEPTEMBER 2025

August 19, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Webinar

Earlier today we have looked at two appeals in relation to allocation in housing disrepairs.  Each appeal was successful for different reasons. My involvement in one of the appeals has led me, along with Steve Cornforth, a webinar on Allocation…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 29: THE DUTIES INVOLVED WHEN PLEADING FRAUD: CLAIMANT'S ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE "MORE CONSISTENT WITH HONESTY" ON THE PART OF THE DEFENDANT

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 29: THE DUTIES INVOLVED WHEN PLEADING FRAUD: CLAIMANT’S ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE “MORE CONSISTENT WITH HONESTY” ON THE PART OF THE DEFENDANT

August 15, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

Here we are looking at a case where the claimant applied for permission to amend its Particulars so it could plead fraud. The application was refused.  It is a reminder of the onerous duties on a party when proposing to…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 28: WHY THE PROPOSED AMENDED PARTICULARS DID NOT SAVE THE CLAIMANT: "MERE ASSERTION IS NOT SUFFICIENT"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 28: WHY THE PROPOSED AMENDED PARTICULARS DID NOT SAVE THE CLAIMANT: “MERE ASSERTION IS NOT SUFFICIENT”

August 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Statements of Case

We are continuing to examine the case looked at in the previous post.  The claimant, faced with an application that the amended Particulars of Claim did not comply with the requirements of a court order, or the rules, made an…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 27: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM STRUCK OUT BECAUSE OF INADEQUATE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: (SOME POINTS OF IMPORTANCE FOR NON CLIN-NEG LAWYERS HERE AS WELL).

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 27: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM STRUCK OUT BECAUSE OF INADEQUATE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: (SOME POINTS OF IMPORTANCE FOR NON CLIN-NEG LAWYERS HERE AS WELL).

August 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Truth, Striking out

Anyone drafting, or contemplating drafting, a pleading in a clinical negligence claim (indeed any type of claim) would be best advised to read, in detail, the judgment we are considering today.  The judge went through an amended Particulars of Claim…

COST BITES 265: THE PERILS OF WORKING UNDER A CFA: THE COSTS JUDGE CORRECTLY ASSESSED COSTS AT NIL: THE DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO TAKE A POINT THAT WAS NOT TAKEN AT AN EARLIER HEARING: THEY WERE SIMPLY FOLLOWING THE COURT'S ORDERS

COST BITES 265: THE PERILS OF WORKING UNDER A CFA: THE COSTS JUDGE CORRECTLY ASSESSED COSTS AT NIL: THE DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO TAKE A POINT THAT WAS NOT TAKEN AT AN EARLIER HEARING: THEY WERE SIMPLY FOLLOWING THE COURT’S ORDERS

August 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Appeals, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we have a case that could well bring tears to the eyes of any litigator who works on a conditional fee basis.  For the second time, on appeal, the claimant solicitor’s costs have been unsuccessful.  The defendant former client…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 25: COURT REFUSES PERMISSION TO AMEND PARTICULARS: "THE PLEADED AVERMENT IS NOT PLAUSIBLE"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 25: COURT REFUSES PERMISSION TO AMEND PARTICULARS: “THE PLEADED AVERMENT IS NOT PLAUSIBLE”

July 15, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

We have looked recently at the principles relating to amendment when the application to amend is made late.  Here we look at a case where refusal to amend was refused because, among other things, the proposed amended case was not…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 24: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS WHEN A TRIAL JUDGE CAN GO OUTSIDE THE PLEADED CASE: THERE IS A SPECTRUM

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 24: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS WHEN A TRIAL JUDGE CAN GO OUTSIDE THE PLEADED CASE: THERE IS A SPECTRUM

July 11, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In this judgment today the Court of Appeal consider, in detail, whether it is appropriate for a judge to go outside the pleaded case. The judgment provides guidance for the practice to be adopted if the judge feels that they…

A QUICK POINT ABOUT  AMENDING PLEADINGS: MAKE A FORMAL APPLICATION TO AMEND AND HAVE THE PROPOSED AMENDED PLEADINGS TO HAND: THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION CONSIDERED

A QUICK POINT ABOUT AMENDING PLEADINGS: MAKE A FORMAL APPLICATION TO AMEND AND HAVE THE PROPOSED AMENDED PLEADINGS TO HAND: THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION CONSIDERED

July 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case

The  post earlier today on the striking out of pleadings contained observations about the need for a party, seeking relief from sanctions on the grounds that it should be able to amend its pleadings, having those amended pleadings to hand…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 22: WHOLE BATCHES OF CASES STRUCK OUT BECAUSE THE PARTICULARS WERE DEFICIENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 22: WHOLE BATCHES OF CASES STRUCK OUT BECAUSE THE PARTICULARS WERE DEFICIENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

July 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Relief from sanctions, Striking out

Here we are looking at a case where numerous actions brought by the claimant were struck out because the Particulars of Claim were wholly deficient.  They remained wholly deficient even after the court had made a peremptory order compelling the…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 21: SHOULD A PARTY BE GIVEN PERMISION TO AMEND AT A LATE STAGE? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 21: SHOULD A PARTY BE GIVEN PERMISION TO AMEND AT A LATE STAGE? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED AND APPLIED

June 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

There are so many judgments concerning late applications to amend pleadings that, often, I decide not to write about them. There are applications to amend that are late, very late,  very, very late or “door of the court” late. The…

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS (1): I'VE SUED THE WRONG DEFENDANT:  CAN THE COURT DO ANYTHING TO HELP?  FIRST OF (WHAT MAY WELL BE) A LONG RUNNING SERIES

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS (1): I’VE SUED THE WRONG DEFENDANT: CAN THE COURT DO ANYTHING TO HELP? FIRST OF (WHAT MAY WELL BE) A LONG RUNNING SERIES

June 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Professional negligence,

There is much to be said for starting a new (and what may well be a  long running) series looking at professional negligence cases, in particular the procedural and practical issues that arise.  Firstly, if (as here) it is a…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 20: CLAIMANT'S COSTS REDUCED BY 50% BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE PLEADED CASE (OR... HOW TO LOSE £3.3 MILLION IN COSTS...)

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 20: CLAIMANT’S COSTS REDUCED BY 50% BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE PLEADED CASE (OR… HOW TO LOSE £3.3 MILLION IN COSTS…)

June 24, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Statements of Case

Today we are looking at a case where a successful claimant’s cost were halved because of its “vague and expansive” pleadings, coupled with a failure to “specify with clarity and precision” what its case was.     (Half a sixpence…

DOES THE HEADING MATTER? IS A PART 18 REQUEST VALID IF IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES?

DOES THE HEADING MATTER? IS A PART 18 REQUEST VALID IF IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES?

June 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

What should the court’s approach be if a party serves a Part 18 request but, for various reasons,  it does not comply with the rules?  The respondent to the request in this case took the point.  The Master had to…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 17: WHAT DOES THE WORD "PORNOGRAPHY" MEAN WHEN INCLUDED IN A PLEADING? COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE ISSUE TODAY

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 17: WHAT DOES THE WORD “PORNOGRAPHY” MEAN WHEN INCLUDED IN A PLEADING? COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE ISSUE TODAY

June 17, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

This series has taken an unexpected turn.  I didn’t expert to be writing about a Court of Appeal decision that considered the precise pleaded meaning of the word “pornography”, but that is precisely what we are doing here.  A decision…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 16: THE CASE AGAINST ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS WAS STRUCK OUT: THE CLAIMANT CANNOT SIMPLY PLEAD "SOMEONE HERE" MUST BE TO BLAME

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 16: THE CASE AGAINST ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS WAS STRUCK OUT: THE CLAIMANT CANNOT SIMPLY PLEAD “SOMEONE HERE” MUST BE TO BLAME

June 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out, Summary judgment

We are looking at a case where the court struck out the claimant’s case against three defendants because of the inadequate way in which the case was pleaded.  General assertions that someone here must be to blame were not sufficient.  The…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS "NOT PURSUED"

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS “NOT PURSUED”

June 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

This series is giving rise to more cases than I initially thought.  Here we look at an example of a claimant wishing to pursue a specific line of argument but having to accept that it was not pleaded and that…

THE CLAIMANT DID NOT NEED TO ANSWER THE PART 18 REQUESTS MADE: THESE REQUESTS ARE AKIN TO THE "PRE CPR-PROCEDURE"

THE CLAIMANT DID NOT NEED TO ANSWER THE PART 18 REQUESTS MADE: THESE REQUESTS ARE AKIN TO THE “PRE CPR-PROCEDURE”

June 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Statements of Case

There have been a number of cases recently relating to Part 18 questions and questions to experts.   Here we are looking at a case where the defendant raised numerous requests to the claimant and sought a peremptory order when it…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 7: THE COUNCIL WAS LIABLE FOR THE STATE OF AN UNADOPTED HIGHWAY: A FINDING FOR THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT A BRIDGE TOO FAR

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 7: THE COUNCIL WAS LIABLE FOR THE STATE OF AN UNADOPTED HIGHWAY: A FINDING FOR THE CLAIMANT WAS NOT A BRIDGE TOO FAR

June 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Personal Injury

The issues of an occupier’s duty in relation to those walking along unadopted highways are always complex.  Here we look at a case where the claimant was successful in establishing a breach of duty following an injury she sustained when…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 14: THE DEFENDANT COULD GIVE EVIDENCE OF MATTERS THAT WERE NOT PLEADED

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 14: THE DEFENDANT COULD GIVE EVIDENCE OF MATTERS THAT WERE NOT PLEADED

June 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

Today we are looking at a case where the judge rejected an argument that evidence could not be given because the particular issue had not been pleaded.  The judge held that, on the facts of this case, the evidence was…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 13:  INAPPROPRIATE PLEADING OF FRAUD LEADS TO COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 13: INAPPROPRIATE PLEADING OF FRAUD LEADS TO COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS

May 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out

I am not sure whether there are more cases about pleadings recently, or whether I am noticing them more having started this series.  However issues relating to statements of case keep arising. Here we look at a case where the…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 12: A DEFENDANT IS NOT EXPECTED TO DIVINE THE NATURE OF THE CLAIMANT'S CASE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 12: A DEFENDANT IS NOT EXPECTED TO DIVINE THE NATURE OF THE CLAIMANT’S CASE

May 27, 2025 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

Today we are looking at a pleadings issue that arose in the course a lengthy contractual dispute.  The claimant made certain, specific allegations, and pleaded that these matters breached a large number of contractual obligations.  However, at trial, the claimant…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 11: THE COURT WON'T STRIKE OUT PARTS OF THE DEFENCE BECAUSE... ITS ACTUALLY THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM THAT DON'T MAKE MUCH SENSE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 11: THE COURT WON’T STRIKE OUT PARTS OF THE DEFENCE BECAUSE… ITS ACTUALLY THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM THAT DON’T MAKE MUCH SENSE

May 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out

Here we are looking at a judgment that is all about statements of case (or at least the part of the judgment we are looking at).  The claimants applied to strike out large parts of the defendant’s defence.  The judge…

CLAIM WAS (ARGUABLY) ISSUED IN TIME WHEN IT ARRIVED AT THE COURT: LATE SERVICE OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM DOES NOT DEPRIVE THE COURT OF JURISDICTION

CLAIM WAS (ARGUABLY) ISSUED IN TIME WHEN IT ARRIVED AT THE COURT: LATE SERVICE OF THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM DOES NOT DEPRIVE THE COURT OF JURISDICTION

May 19, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Jurisdiction,, Limitation, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

Today we are looking at a case that raises important issues.  The judge decided that calling someone gay is not defamatory. However here we are not concerned with the substantive issues but two procedural issues raised in the case. Firstly…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 10: THE DUTIES ON A PARTY PLEADING ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD OR DECEIT

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 10: THE DUTIES ON A PARTY PLEADING ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD OR DECEIT

May 16, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Statements of Case

Allegations of fraud have to be pleaded with  care.  Those pleading such assertions must have “reasonably credible material” to support them.  Here we look at a case where allegations of deceit were made.  The judge found that the allegations had…

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 2: CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE, CAUSATION, EVIDENCE  AND FAILURE TO WEAR A CYCLE HELMET (SOMETHING ABOUT PLEADINGS TOO)

PERSONAL INJURY POINTS 2: CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE, CAUSATION, EVIDENCE AND FAILURE TO WEAR A CYCLE HELMET (SOMETHING ABOUT PLEADINGS TOO)

May 14, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

In the previous post in this series I mentioned that there was a backlog. I didn’t anticipate that I would be looking at a case that was decided in 2009.  However the judgment has recently arrived on BAILLI and it…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 9: THE PRIMARY FACTS UNDERLYING ALLEGATIONS OF DISHONESTY MUST BE PLEADED

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 9: THE PRIMARY FACTS UNDERLYING ALLEGATIONS OF DISHONESTY MUST BE PLEADED

May 9, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

Parties alleging dishonesty and fraud have to be very careful in the way they plead their case.  These matters cannot be pleaded lightly, and there are professional obligations on the pleader to ensure that there is reasonably credible material that…

DOES AN  ELECTRONICALLY ISSUED AND SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED CLAIM FORM REQUIRED RE-SEALING AND FILING PRIOR TO SERVICE? AN IMPORTANT ISSUE CONSIDERED

DOES AN ELECTRONICALLY ISSUED AND SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED CLAIM FORM REQUIRED RE-SEALING AND FILING PRIOR TO SERVICE? AN IMPORTANT ISSUE CONSIDERED

May 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form

If a claimant serves a “amended” claim form that has not been resealed does that amount to good service? That issue was considered in the case we are considering today.  The result is of considerable practical significance. However it pays…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 8: "ASSERTED LOSS" DID NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND THE CLAIM WAS STRUCK OUT

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 8: “ASSERTED LOSS” DID NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND THE CLAIM WAS STRUCK OUT

May 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Statements of Case, Striking out, Summary judgment

We are looking at a case where the entire case was struck out on various grounds. The claimant did not attend the hearing to dispute the issues.  However I have isolated one ground of the judgment which relates to a…

JUDGE STRIKES OUT CLAIM FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: IT IS "INCOHERENT" AND OBSTRUCTS THE JUST DISPOSAL OF THE CLAIM

JUDGE STRIKES OUT CLAIM FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: IT IS “INCOHERENT” AND OBSTRUCTS THE JUST DISPOSAL OF THE CLAIM

April 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Members Content, Schedules, Summary judgment

It is an easy matter for a claimant to insert a claim for a substantial loss of earnings into a schedule of damages.  However a claimant then has to prove that loss. Further, even prior to trial, a defendant is…

DEFENDANT GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A DEFENCE : "I AM IN NO DOUBT THAT I SHOULD GRANT THE RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION OF OF ONE DAY..."

DEFENDANT GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A DEFENCE : “I AM IN NO DOUBT THAT I SHOULD GRANT THE RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION OF OF ONE DAY…”

April 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Ahmad v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2025] EWHC 936 (Pat) Mr Justice Mellor granted the defendant an extension of one day to file a defence, this had the effect of making the defendant’s applications to strike…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 7: "THE CLAIMANT AND WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO PLEAD SUCH A CLAIM IN BROAD AND VAGUE TERMS": A CLAIMANT HAS TO PLEAD HOW THE ALLEGED BREACHES HAVE CAUSED THE ALLEGED LOSS

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 7: “THE CLAIMANT AND WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO PLEAD SUCH A CLAIM IN BROAD AND VAGUE TERMS”: A CLAIMANT HAS TO PLEAD HOW THE ALLEGED BREACHES HAVE CAUSED THE ALLEGED LOSS

April 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Members Content, Statements of Case

Here we are looking at an application that was all about the claimant’s inadequate pleadings. After putting the defects right (at at third attempt)  the case was allowed to proceed – but it was a lengthy and expensive process for…

LITIGATION "WHACK-A-MOLE" - THE MOVING TARGET AND POOR PLEADINGS - IN A CASE ABOUT ALLEGEDLY POOR PLEADINGS

LITIGATION “WHACK-A-MOLE” – THE MOVING TARGET AND POOR PLEADINGS – IN A CASE ABOUT ALLEGEDLY POOR PLEADINGS

April 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Conduct, Members Content, Statements of Case

We are looking again at the judgment of Mr Justice Saini in Israel Russell v Barry Coulter [2025] EWHC 493 (KB).  This was a case alleging that the defendant barrister had pleaded a case badly.  The claim was rejected. However it is…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 5 : THE CLAIMANT CAN'T NOW ARGUE SOMETHING CONTRARY TO HIS OWN PLEADED CASE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 5 : THE CLAIMANT CAN’T NOW ARGUE SOMETHING CONTRARY TO HIS OWN PLEADED CASE

March 31, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

We are looking at another case in which the pleadings played a significant part. In Daniel Maurice Wagner v Bright Station Ventures Management Limited [2025] EWHC 669 (KB) Mr Justice Sweeting rejected an argument from the claimant that was contrary…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 4: A FAILURE BY A CLAIMANT TO ADEQUATELY PARTICULARISE ITS CASE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 4: A FAILURE BY A CLAIMANT TO ADEQUATELY PARTICULARISE ITS CASE

March 25, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Members Content, Statements of Case

When you start looking for cases about pleadings it is surprising how issues in relation to statements of case keep popping up.  We see it in the judgment of  Jeremy Hyam KC in  Kau Media Group Limited v Thomas Hart [2025] EWHC…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 1: FAILURE TO SERVE A REPLY ALLEGING FORGERY LEADS TO JUDGMENT AT TRIAL BEING SET ASIDE

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 1: FAILURE TO SERVE A REPLY ALLEGING FORGERY LEADS TO JUDGMENT AT TRIAL BEING SET ASIDE

March 5, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

For some time now I have been meaning to write a series on the numerous issues that arise when cases are not pleaded properly.  There are a catalogue of cases where the parties come to court, normally shortly before (sometimes…

THE COURT SETS ASIDE AN ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: ACTION AGAINST THAT DEFENDANT DISMISSED

THE COURT SETS ASIDE AN ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: ACTION AGAINST THAT DEFENDANT DISMISSED

February 13, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Extensions of time, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

One of the issues considered by Mrs Justice Bacon in Vauxhall Motors Ltd & Ors v Denso Automotive UK Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 213 (Ch) was whether an order extending time for service of the claim form should be…

AVOIDING THE PITFALLS IN SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WEBINAR 4th FEBRUARY 2025: CAN YOU AFFORD TO MISS IT?

AVOIDING THE PITFALLS IN SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: WEBINAR 4th FEBRUARY 2025: CAN YOU AFFORD TO MISS IT?

January 22, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Webinar

Every year this blog covers numerous  cases where claimants (and occasionally defendants)  come to grief in relation to service of the claim form. The frustrating issue in relation to service issues is that most (if not all) of the problems…

"STATEMENTS OF CASE PLAY AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN CIVIL LITIGATION": THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT ALLOWED TO RUN A CASE ON CAUSATION THAT IT HAD NOT PLEADED: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE CONSIDERED

“STATEMENTS OF CASE PLAY AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN CIVIL LITIGATION”: THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT ALLOWED TO RUN A CASE ON CAUSATION THAT IT HAD NOT PLEADED: CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE CONSIDERED

December 23, 2024 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Statements of Case

In MJF v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust [2024] EWHC 3156 (KB)  HHJ Emma Kelly (sitting as a High Court Judge) found that the defendant in a clinical negligence trial was trying to run a case on causation that…

CLAIM WAS ISSUED PROPERLY IN THE HIGH COURT, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS SENT TO THE WRONG OFFICE

CLAIM WAS ISSUED PROPERLY IN THE HIGH COURT, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS SENT TO THE WRONG OFFICE

December 17, 2024 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out

In Lawrence, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Croydon [2024] EWHC 3061 (Admin) Mr Justice Linden dismissed the defendant’s application to strike out a claim on the basis that it had not been brought in time.  The…

ITS NOT TOO LATE IN THE YEAR FOR "CLAIM FORM" CASES: JUDGE ALLOWS APPEAL AND GRANTS CLAIMANT EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: CPR 3.9 & DENTON DID NOT APPLY

ITS NOT TOO LATE IN THE YEAR FOR “CLAIM FORM” CASES: JUDGE ALLOWS APPEAL AND GRANTS CLAIMANT EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE THE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM: CPR 3.9 & DENTON DID NOT APPLY

December 6, 2024 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Uncategorized

I am grateful to solicitor Chris Topping of Broudie Jackson Canter for sending me a copy of the judgment of HHJ Bird in Brown -v- the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (5th December 2024). The judge allowed an appeal against the…

1 2 … 5 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 35.2K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • SENIOR COURT COSTS OFFICE GUIDE 2025: NEW EDITION PUBLISHED YESTERDAY
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE DUTY TO PUT YOUR CASE TO A WITNESS: THE PRINCIPLES SUMMARISED IN THE HIGH COURT
  • SHOULD COSTS BE DISAPPLIED IN A “MIXED” CASE WHERE PART OF A CLAIM HAS BEEN STRUCK OUT? A DECISION ON APPEAL
  • “PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE SERVE QUITE DIFFERENT PURPOSES”: THE NEED FOR CLAIMANTS TO PLEAD THEIR CASE WHEN APPLYING FOR AN INJUNCTION
  • MAZUR MATTERS 24: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE “CONDUCT OF LITIGATION” (5): THE MEANING OF “COURT” AND WHAT ACTIVITIES ARE NOT COVERED BY ACT

Top Posts

  • EXPERT WATCH 21: THE EXPERT WHO FAILED TO CONSIDER NEW EVIDENCE IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL AND "WHO WAS NOT PARTICULARLY OPEN TO RECONSIDERING HIS OPINION"
  • MAZUR MATTERS 24: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION" (5): THE MEANING OF "COURT" AND WHAT ACTIVITIES ARE NOT COVERED BY ACT
  • SHOULD COSTS BE DISAPPLIED IN A "MIXED" CASE WHERE PART OF A CLAIM HAS BEEN STRUCK OUT? A DECISION ON APPEAL
  • "PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE SERVE QUITE DIFFERENT PURPOSES": THE NEED FOR CLAIMANTS TO PLEAD THEIR CASE WHEN APPLYING FOR AN INJUNCTION
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE DUTY TO PUT YOUR CASE TO A WITNESS: THE PRINCIPLES SUMMARISED IN THE HIGH COURT

Archives

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.